Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Step back, Harry!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLej6SQBL20

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-will-repay-renovation-money-on-frogmore-cottage/

So now that they are also paying back the renovation what else is there to criticize?

Are they also paying for their security? No, so there's that.

There's also the Clinton foundation model they want to follow, but since I'm an American - that's for the British to get upset about.

For context - security costs nearly 8M pounds per year, so paying back Frogmore is a start but peanuts compared to the security bill.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7902651/Taxpayers-look-set-paying-7-6million-year-security-bill-Harry-Meghan.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie won’t have a British accent. Wonder where he will be educated?

In a private school in Vancouver like I thought all along.

Link?

He’s 8 months old so no one knows.

[Anonymous]

By being Duke and Duchess of Sussex, are there no duties to the people of Sussex?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Step back, Harry!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLej6SQBL20

Yep. Now he walks behind Meghan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:By being Duke and Duchess of Sussex, are there no duties to the people of Sussex?

The Sussex and Cambridge are non-landed titles. They don't have an actual duchy with income or land titles to their name. In the royal family - that's specifically the Duchy of Lancaster (the monarch's income) and the Duchy of Cornwall (the Prince of Wales income).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-will-repay-renovation-money-on-frogmore-cottage/

So now that they are also paying back the renovation what else is there to criticize?

They should fund their own security if they want to be that independent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had it on good authority that if they relinquished their titles all the MM haters would chill. That’s what happened right??

Who is this “good authority”?

PP is poking at all the Meghan critics that who claimed they only objected to the hypocrisy of H and M wanting to be independent and keep their titles at the same time. This calls that bluff.

We are all individuals with our own thoughts, like Harry and Meghan.

Exactly. I don’t understand the need for some to jump on every sentence they disagree with.

So basically you want to b*tch and whine about them no matter what. Just be upfront and clear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-will-repay-renovation-money-on-frogmore-cottage/

So now that they are also paying back the renovation what else is there to criticize?

They should fund their own security if they want to be that independent.

Agree.

By disallowing the use of HRH and removing the royal duties may have been the way to reduce security costs dramatically. Part of royal duties is having a schedule published well in advance of any official duty. No royal duties, no publication, may be less of a need for officially paid for security.

That said, as 6th and 7th in line, there may be some need for security. Depends on how quiet their lives are in Canada.

HM is providing H&M a year before revisiting the topic.

[Anonymous]

A good reason to provide them with security is so that they aren’t kidnapped and used as leverage against the BRF. Then there’s huge public fallout!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am just confused, what are they negotiating? You quit your job, very publicly throwing your employer under the bus at that, what do you negotiate?

As people up thread were quick to point out - this is a family and a business. And as far popularity goes - Harry not only had the most visibility but he probably knew all the secrets. Secrets William can't tell if he wants to be King. But Harry? Pshh, he's got nothing to lose and is at the perfect age to get out and capitalize on it all.

But these people probably knew of all Harry's secrets too, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HOLY CRAP - this is their PUBLIC pool. Yes, Meghan I want to move their too - are you looking for a gardener?

Well you know there is a reason why Vancouver is one of the most expensive cities in the world

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A good reason to provide them with security is so that they aren’t kidnapped and used as leverage against the BRF. Then there’s huge public fallout!

1. Harry and Meghan shouldn't then claim to be financially independent.
2. If the BRF want them to be safe, then they should pay for their security. Just like Andrew pays for his girls security. They can certainly afford it. They no longer have public roles, they should not longer have tax payer funded security. It's outrageous that they dropped the public duty part to make a private fortune, while at the same time expecting the public to pay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am just confused, what are they negotiating? You quit your job, very publicly throwing your employer under the bus at that, what do you negotiate?

As people up thread were quick to point out - this is a family and a business. And as far popularity goes - Harry not only had the most visibility but he probably knew all the secrets. Secrets William can't tell if he wants to be King. But Harry? Pshh, he's got nothing to lose and is at the perfect age to get out and capitalize on it all.

But these people probably knew of all Harry's secrets too, no?

Maybe he doesn’t care if his get out. Sometimes the things your family thinks you should be ashamed of are things you keep quiet for their sake, not your own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

They merely want the same terms as laid out to his grandmother and brother - 4-5 years part-time with their new family.

Failing that example, you can look at all of the other European royals for the same model.

His grandmother and brother were heirs to the throne, he isn't. Quod licet iovi, non licet bovi.