Barr and Durham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

For what? And please do not say something dumb like treason. Like, what federal crime under what federal statute do you believe John Brennan could be indicted for?

I really believe that this is either foreign trolling or someone that literally has zero idea what they are talking about.

My guess: lying.

And possibly other crimes. Leaking?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For what? And please do not say something dumb like treason. Like, what federal crime under what federal statute do you believe John Brennan could be indicted for?

I really believe that this is either foreign trolling or someone that literally has zero idea what they are talking about.

My guess: lying.

Oh, so a process crime?

No. He lied to Congress. Maybe to the FBI as well, but most certainly to Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am too.

Durham won't come up with anything, but Barr will try to spin it as such, and with help of the likes of Hannity and OAN, people like you will slurp it up.

Guessing that the report will harshly criticize several folks with no indictments. Huge loss for Trump.

[Anonymous]

The top aide resigning — WHAT DOES IT MEAN??

[Anonymous]

No. He lied to Congress. Maybe to the FBI as well, but most certainly to Congress.

And, ask yourself: why did he lie? What was he covering up? Was he involved in the dirty dossier? The dossier they all knew was false? Was he involved directly or indirectly in the spying on Trump campaign? Did he know that there was a FISA on Carter Page and that Page had worked with of for the CIA on several occasions? I'm guessing there are lots of things he might have covered up with lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For what? And please do not say something dumb like treason. Like, what federal crime under what federal statute do you believe John Brennan could be indicted for?

I really believe that this is either foreign trolling or someone that literally has zero idea what they are talking about.

My guess: lying.

Oh, so a process crime?

No. He lied to Congress. Maybe to the FBI as well, but most certainly to Congress.

Keep dreaming. Brennan will not be indicted for anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

No. He lied to Congress. Maybe to the FBI as well, but most certainly to Congress.

And, ask yourself: why did he lie? What was he covering up? Was he involved in the dirty dossier? The dossier they all knew was false? Was he involved directly or indirectly in the spying on Trump campaign? Did he know that there was a FISA on Carter Page and that Page had worked with of for the CIA on several occasions? I'm guessing there are lots of things he might have covered up with lies.

Again, a foreign troll or someone that does not understand how anything works.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/19/us/politics/durham-john-brennan-cia.html

I realize it's the NY Times, so some will immediately discount it, but folks, you are stone cold idiots if you think that the CIA wanted to put any stock in the Steele dossier. There are lots of reasons, not the least of which is ego.

The rest of the above are typical right-wing conspiracy theory talking points.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There may not even be a report. But, there will be indictments.

Just curious... who exactly do you think is getting indicted?

DP.
Brennan, for one.

Sorry, when one is not a target of an investigation, one will not be indicted. It doesn't work like that, no matter how frothy the right wing echo chamber tries to get you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For what? And please do not say something dumb like treason. Like, what federal crime under what federal statute do you believe John Brennan could be indicted for?

I really believe that this is either foreign trolling or someone that literally has zero idea what they are talking about.

My guess: lying.

Oh, so a process crime?

No. He lied to Congress. Maybe to the FBI as well, but most certainly to Congress.

So if Brennan lies to Congress, it is a crime, but if Eric Prince and Junior and DeJoy and... lie to Congress or the FBI, it is no biggie, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

No. He lied to Congress. Maybe to the FBI as well, but most certainly to Congress.

And, ask yourself: why did he lie? What was he covering up? Was he involved in the dirty dossier? The dossier they all knew was false? Was he involved directly or indirectly in the spying on Trump campaign? Did he know that there was a FISA on Carter Page and that Page had worked with of for the CIA on several occasions? I'm guessing there are lots of things he might have covered up with lies.

The dossier wasn't false. Please stop repeating that lie.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/was-the-pee-tape-a-lie-all-along-/amp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

No. He lied to Congress. Maybe to the FBI as well, but most certainly to Congress.

And, ask yourself: why did he lie? What was he covering up? Was he involved in the dirty dossier? The dossier they all knew was false? Was he involved directly or indirectly in the spying on Trump campaign? Did he know that there was a FISA on Carter Page and that Page had worked with of for the CIA on several occasions? I'm guessing there are lots of things he might have covered up with lies.

The dossier wasn't false. Please stop repeating that lie.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/was-the-pee-tape-a-lie-all-along-/amp

Dear Lord. You are hopeless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

No. He lied to Congress. Maybe to the FBI as well, but most certainly to Congress.

And, ask yourself: why did he lie? What was he covering up? Was he involved in the dirty dossier? The dossier they all knew was false? Was he involved directly or indirectly in the spying on Trump campaign? Did he know that there was a FISA on Carter Page and that Page had worked with of for the CIA on several occasions? I'm guessing there are lots of things he might have covered up with lies.

The dossier wasn't false. Please stop repeating that lie.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/was-the-pee-tape-a-lie-all-along-/amp

Dear Lord. You are hopeless.

DP. That is not a substantive response. While some of the dossier has been discredited, much of it had been corroborated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

No. He lied to Congress. Maybe to the FBI as well, but most certainly to Congress.

And, ask yourself: why did he lie? What was he covering up? Was he involved in the dirty dossier? The dossier they all knew was false? Was he involved directly or indirectly in the spying on Trump campaign? Did he know that there was a FISA on Carter Page and that Page had worked with of for the CIA on several occasions? I'm guessing there are lots of things he might have covered up with lies.

The dossier wasn't false. Please stop repeating that lie.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/was-the-pee-tape-a-lie-all-along-/amp

Dear Lord. You are hopeless.

DP. That is not a substantive response. While some of the dossier has been discredited, much of it had been corroborated.

That is because it was assembled using largely open source information - much of it, mere rumors.

The Steele report reads like a pile of rumors surrounded by public information pulled off the Internet, and the Horowitz report does nothing to dispel this notion.
At the time the FBI submitted its first FISA application, Horowitz writes, it had “corroborated limited information in Steele’s election reporting, and most of that was publicly available information.” Horowitz says of Steele’s reports: “The CIA viewed it as ‘internet rumor.’”
Worse (and this part of the story should be tattooed on the heads of Russia truthers), the FBI’s interviews of Steele’s sources revealed Steele embellished the most explosive parts of his report.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/horowitz-report-steele-dossier-collusion-news-media-924944/

[Anonymous]

Popcorn time???!!!

[Anonymous]

Gird your loins... eminent actions