+1 McLean’s leadership doesn’t deserve credit for this decision, nor can they be trusted. The timing couldn’t be worse. If they intended to leave ECNL, the logical move would have been to do so last year when they could transition into MLS and GA with an established coaching staff and player base. Many staff and families were calling for the club to take a stand back then, yet leadership failed to act. Now, they’re essentially starting from scratch, forced to compete with FVU and other clubs for both coaches and players—without any leverage. Does anyone truly believe they can pull this off? I certainly don’t. |
lol. Of course you think any pick for GA is terrible. What about the move that ECNL boys just made. I bet you thought that was awesome!!! |
|
How so? |
|
DYOR. go read some books or back to community college to brush up on your English reading. Go to McLean website for GA ID Sessions info. It is clear. "MYS is excited to announce that we are joining the Girls Academy (GA) for the 2025-2026 season! We will be forming two teams in each U13-U19 age group to compete in this league - a top-tier GA team and a second-tier GA Aspire team. ID Sessions have been scheduled and start the week of February 24. Players who would like to be evaluated for a roster spot should REGISTER NOW. Our continued commitment is to provide the best opportunities for player development and the transition to the Girls Academy is the next step in ensuring our female players have access to high levels of competition, coaching, and development. " |
McLean will be fine yall. This conversation should be more about what the next domino is because McLean made this bold move |
+1 And McLean only matter because of their 15 year prescence as the preimminent girls clubs in NoVa. Will there teams be middling for the next year or two probably but that not the formula they are working from. |
It is awful. No one can dispute that. Boys side sucks. ECNL not competitive. But you just threw out your girls program. Maybe there is good reason to do so (for the future) but don't go around saying good for girls now playing. |
Agree McLean will be fine. What they have done though is toss away the top level girls team for the hope of rebuilding one and rebuilding on the boys side. |
By continuing to argue the point you are making it clear that your reading comprehension is poor. The new clarifying language from the website, which I already posted above, highlights the ambiguity in their initial message. Glad it was just poor drafting and not sneakiness on their part. Sorry you can’t read. |
But why are they dead long term? That makes no sense. GA is a long build to even be close. It is the players but are they getting better? -- but is also ECNL. College coaches prefer ECNL. That does not mean they will not scout GA. They will. And GA can make it much more friendly by copying ECNL in terms of number of showcases and matching the right teams. GA has not done that yet but they could. ECNL has no trademark on what they do. |
Why do you care so much if it’s one team or two unless your daughter’s trying out? For those that have daughters trying out they’ve reached out to McLean and have been told there will be both GA and aspire…so get over yourself already! |
Arlington is not leaving ECNL. No one in their right mind is. That is the issue. The boy's side is a problem but you don't trade away the top on the girl's side for the boy's side top and a hope that maybe someday GA makes it. I do not think there are many hard choices to make. I agree that the answer is a combination of ECNL and MLS Next. That will not involve GA though. |
You must be a girl dad and think that clubs care about girls more than boys. ECNL and MLSN have a business to run. If Arlington boys are underperforming or leaving to MLSN aka losing money, guess what , they will most likely be forced to switch over. |