SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

If a business decides to shun half the people in this country, that is on them. It won't end well.
Look at what happened to Bud Light when they essentially mocked their customer base.

Yeh. The Bud Light reference is misplaced. It was about an effort to expand its customer base. Instead, its historical customer base got all upset that their favorite beer was trying to expand their overall customer base.

Yeah... that is what their goal was, reportedly.
But, when the VP of marketing comes out and essentially insults its customer base, then hires a divisive figure like Dylan Mulvaney to promote the product, there is naturally going to be an uproar. It is hard to believe they did not see that coming.

The VP of marketing said she wanted to make the brand appeal to men and women. In the end, she succeeded in making certain it appeals to neither.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

Yes. Also, love thy neighbor. The people protesting helping others are not real Christians, they just think they are.

Ah ha. So we have religious people whose views fall all along the spectrum from far left to far right, but you're saying there is an orthodoxy of viewpoint - that those "protesting helping others" are heretics.? I think all you have to do to be a "real" Christian is believe in Jesus, at least that's what Paul said. Or is this more appropropriate for the religion forum?

The fact that it’s not clear if a post belongs in the religion or politics forum is a microcosm of exactly the problem we are facing in this country. A really, really big problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

Most men don’t relate to tranny juice. It’s like a ridiculous political statement now.

If a business decides to shun half the people in this country, that is on them. It won't end well.
Look at what happened to Bud Light when they essentially mocked their customer base.

Yeh. The Bud Light reference is misplaced. It was about an effort to expand its customer base. Instead, its historical customer base got all upset that their favorite beer was trying to expand their overall customer base.

Yeah... that is what their goal was, reportedly.
But, when the VP of marketing comes out and essentially insults its customer base, then hires a divisive figure like Dylan Mulvaney to promote the product, there is naturally going to be an uproar. It is hard to believe they did not see that coming.

The VP of marketing said she wanted to make the brand appeal to men and women. In the end, she succeeded in making certain it appeals to neither.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

pretty familiar with most of the Biblical verses, but I didn't see that one in there anywhere

DP... no you aren't familiar with most of the Biblical verses because the feed your enemy quote used by the PP above in reference to the penis cake comes from multiple places in the Bible:

Proverbs 12:21-22 and again in Romans 12:20.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

If a business decides to shun half the people in this country, that is on them. It won't end well.
Look at what happened to Bud Light when they essentially mocked their customer base.

Yeh. The Bud Light reference is misplaced. It was about an effort to expand its customer base. Instead, its historical customer base got all upset that their favorite beer was trying to expand their overall customer base.

Yeah... that is what their goal was, reportedly.
But, when the VP of marketing comes out and essentially insults its customer base, then hires a divisive figure like Dylan Mulvaney to promote the product, there is naturally going to be an uproar. It is hard to believe they did not see that coming.

The VP of marketing said she wanted to make the brand appeal to men and women. In the end, she succeeded in making certain it appeals to neither.

So, it's fine to sell beer to Joe and Bob but if you sell beer to Dylan, then Joe and Bob are "insulted" by that. Ummm what? What in the sam hell does Dylan buying beer have to do with Joe and Bob? If that isn't some deranged snowflake behavior by Joe and Bob then I don't know what is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

If a business decides to shun half the people in this country, that is on them. It won't end well.
Look at what happened to Bud Light when they essentially mocked their customer base.

Yeh. The Bud Light reference is misplaced. It was about an effort to expand its customer base. Instead, its historical customer base got all upset that their favorite beer was trying to expand their overall customer base.

Yeah... that is what their goal was, reportedly.
But, when the VP of marketing comes out and essentially insults its customer base, then hires a divisive figure like Dylan Mulvaney to promote the product, there is naturally going to be an uproar. It is hard to believe they did not see that coming.

The VP of marketing said she wanted to make the brand appeal to men and women. In the end, she succeeded in making certain it appeals to neither.

So, it's fine to sell beer to Joe and Bob but if you sell beer to Dylan, then Joe and Bob are "insulted" by that. Ummm what? What in the sam hell does Dylan buying beer have to do with Joe and Bob? If that isn't some deranged snowflake behavior by Joe and Bob then I don't know what is.

Dylan can buy all the beer she wants. But, they made a beer can with her face and had her promote it. If Joe and Bob don't want to buy the beer that Dylan is pushing, that's on them. Usually commercials are designed for the target audience. I guess Dylan's supporters don't like beer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

Didn't that already happen when the Little Red Hen diner turned away Sarah Huckabee for no better reason that she was a Trump appointee?
I don't even think the employees invoked "religious principle" as a reason. They just didn't like her politics.

As a Christian who was raised as a Catholic, the conservative policies of turning their backs on refugees, the sick, the poor and the elderly is a CLEAR violation of my religious principles and goes against EVERYTHING that Christ taught in the four Gospels, as it also goes against all of the teachings of St. Francis and many other major figures of the Church. It is my religious conviction that unless and until Republicans change their ways and embrace Christ, we as Christians cannot serve them.

Fellow Catholic here. They hate us. They write here on this forum over and over that they hate us. I'm not saying that you should hate them, but recognize that you're voting for people who literally hate everything you stand for, and are seeking to undermine a Catholic way of life in nearly all aspects.

No one is undermining the MAGA Catholic way of life. You are free to attend Mass, free not to marry someone of your own sex, free not to have an abortion, free to hold your religious views. No one is suggesting that those activities should be illegal, etc. But you are not free to demand that others must follow your views on these issues. You are not free to demand that others refrain from criticizing the MAGA Bishops.

here is the thing....no one asked this lady to make a gay wedding website. and if they had, she could have simply refused to take on the job. Making up a hypothetical and running it up and through the supreme court was fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

If a business decides to shun half the people in this country, that is on them. It won't end well.
Look at what happened to Bud Light when they essentially mocked their customer base.

Yeh. The Bud Light reference is misplaced. It was about an effort to expand its customer base. Instead, its historical customer base got all upset that their favorite beer was trying to expand their overall customer base.

Yeah... that is what their goal was, reportedly.
But, when the VP of marketing comes out and essentially insults its customer base, then hires a divisive figure like Dylan Mulvaney to promote the product, there is naturally going to be an uproar. It is hard to believe they did not see that coming.

The VP of marketing said she wanted to make the brand appeal to men and women. In the end, she succeeded in making certain it appeals to neither.

So, it's fine to sell beer to Joe and Bob but if you sell beer to Dylan, then Joe and Bob are "insulted" by that. Ummm what? What in the sam hell does Dylan buying beer have to do with Joe and Bob? If that isn't some deranged snowflake behavior by Joe and Bob then I don't know what is.

Dylan can buy all the beer she wants. But, they made a beer can with her face and had her promote it. If Joe and Bob don't want to buy the beer that Dylan is pushing, that's on them. Usually commercials are designed for the target audience. I guess Dylan's supporters don't like beer.

Wow Joe and Bob are a$$holes, aren’t they? And Dylan is not herself divisive. It’s people like Joe and Bob who are so full of hate that they can’t stand someone’s mere existence for no good reason (she’s never even met Joe and Bob so why the hateful reaction?) who are the divisive ones. Reminds me of how racist white southerners used to get enraged if a black actor was shown as too human or familiar with white actors in a film.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, you think it is appropriate for people to be FORCED to make statements in which they don't believe?

Nobody is asking anyone to believe in anything. They are simply asking for the website to say "Steve and Tom" instead of "Steve and Dawn." She has nothing to do with the content other than loading it into a template.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

pretty familiar with most of the Biblical verses, but I didn't see that one in there anywhere

DP... no you aren't familiar with most of the Biblical verses because the feed your enemy quote used by the PP above in reference to the penis cake comes from multiple places in the Bible:

Proverbs 12:21-22 and again in Romans 12:20.

WTF are you talking about?. I was quoting the post that said "So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell." So where is that in the Bible?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

If a business decides to shun half the people in this country, that is on them. It won't end well.
Look at what happened to Bud Light when they essentially mocked their customer base.

Yeh. The Bud Light reference is misplaced. It was about an effort to expand its customer base. Instead, its historical customer base got all upset that their favorite beer was trying to expand their overall customer base.

Yeah... that is what their goal was, reportedly.
But, when the VP of marketing comes out and essentially insults its customer base, then hires a divisive figure like Dylan Mulvaney to promote the product, there is naturally going to be an uproar. It is hard to believe they did not see that coming.

The VP of marketing said she wanted to make the brand appeal to men and women. In the end, she succeeded in making certain it appeals to neither.

So, it's fine to sell beer to Joe and Bob but if you sell beer to Dylan, then Joe and Bob are "insulted" by that. Ummm what? What in the sam hell does Dylan buying beer have to do with Joe and Bob? If that isn't some deranged snowflake behavior by Joe and Bob then I don't know what is.

Dylan can buy all the beer she wants. But, they made a beer can with her face and had her promote it. If Joe and Bob don't want to buy the beer that Dylan is pushing, that's on them. Usually commercials are designed for the target audience. I guess Dylan's supporters don't like beer.

They only put Dylan's face on a few customized cans for Dylan. Nobody ever made Joe and Bob buy Bud Lite cans with Dylan on them. And, it's the same damn beer Joe and Bob have been drinking all along. it's just plain stupid of Joe and Bob to feel somehow insulted by it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

pretty familiar with most of the Biblical verses, but I didn't see that one in there anywhere

DP... no you aren't familiar with most of the Biblical verses because the feed your enemy quote used by the PP above in reference to the penis cake comes from multiple places in the Bible:

Proverbs 12:21-22 and again in Romans 12:20.

WTF are you talking about?. I was quoting the post that said "So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell." So where is that in the Bible?

Wow, are you slow or what? Romans 12:20 clearly says to GO AHEAD AND SERVE them even if they are your enemies. Serve them, whether that's a website, a cake, or whatever else, and that it doesn't matter if you disagree with their beliefs, because if their beliefs are sinful that's on them and not you.

You really fail at being a Christian.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

If a business decides to shun half the people in this country, that is on them. It won't end well.
Look at what happened to Bud Light when they essentially mocked their customer base.

Yeh. The Bud Light reference is misplaced. It was about an effort to expand its customer base. Instead, its historical customer base got all upset that their favorite beer was trying to expand their overall customer base.

Yeah... that is what their goal was, reportedly.
But, when the VP of marketing comes out and essentially insults its customer base, then hires a divisive figure like Dylan Mulvaney to promote the product, there is naturally going to be an uproar. It is hard to believe they did not see that coming.

The VP of marketing said she wanted to make the brand appeal to men and women. In the end, she succeeded in making certain it appeals to neither.

So, it's fine to sell beer to Joe and Bob but if you sell beer to Dylan, then Joe and Bob are "insulted" by that. Ummm what? What in the sam hell does Dylan buying beer have to do with Joe and Bob? If that isn't some deranged snowflake behavior by Joe and Bob then I don't know what is.

Dylan can buy all the beer she wants. But, they made a beer can with her face and had her promote it. If Joe and Bob don't want to buy the beer that Dylan is pushing, that's on them. Usually commercials are designed for the target audience. I guess Dylan's supporters don't like beer.

Wow Joe and Bob are a$$holes, aren’t they? And Dylan is not herself divisive. It’s people like Joe and Bob who are so full of hate that they can’t stand someone’s mere existence for no good reason (she’s never even met Joe and Bob so why the hateful reaction?) who are the divisive ones. Reminds me of how racist white southerners used to get enraged if a black actor was shown as too human or familiar with white actors in a film.

DP. I'm sure a beer with a giant picture of Trump on it would go over well with people like you as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

Yes. Also, love thy neighbor. The people protesting helping others are not real Christians, they just think they are.

Ah ha. So we have religious people whose views fall all along the spectrum from far left to far right, but you're saying there is an orthodoxy of viewpoint - that those "protesting helping others" are heretics.? I think all you have to do to be a "real" Christian is believe in Jesus, at least that's what Paul said. Or is this more appropropriate for the religion forum?

Really now? So all I have to do is say I believe in Jesus, but I believe he's a purple alien space monkey and I'm still good, according to your perception of Pauline doctrine? 😆😆😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

Yes. Also, love thy neighbor. The people protesting helping others are not real Christians, they just think they are.

+1000