SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Shocked! Guess we will be divided forever. |
Anonymous
|
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/30/303-creative-elenis-supreme-court-decision-lgbtq-rights/
Sorry forgot to include. |
Anonymous
| Eff that. This is insanity. These christian fundamentalists want to turn us into Afghanistan. |
Anonymous
How’s that? |
Anonymous
| So, you think it is appropriate for people to be FORCED to make statements in which they don't believe? |
Anonymous
No I’m just going to reject business from MAGA. |
Anonymous
Good for you... now you see how the 1st amendment works. |
Anonymous
| She didn't even have clients asking for a website. Wow. |
Anonymous
| The 'wise latina' continues to dissent longer than normal. Surprised? |
Anonymous
Do you know what a wedding website is? It has info about hotel blocks and registries. It's not a statement of beliefs. |
Anonymous
| These cases are so dumb. We know how the Court will rule, why waste all the time and money litigating it? Gays aren’t exactly going to have a hard time finding a website designer who doesn’t oppose their cause. |
Anonymous
Wedding websites are all different. This is a custom request. You don't know what she may be asked to do. And, that is what this case is about. You cannot compel a person to create something against their beliefs. Just like I would never create something for a follower of Satan. And, I would be within my rights to refuse that. |
Anonymous
| Another decision that should have been 9-0 for those who believe in free speech. The protected class comment is beyond belief. |
Anonymous
But that didn’t happen. This was just a ruse to turn the screws on gay people. |
Anonymous
She is the definition of an activist judge. Look at her record, she is the most extreme of all the Supremes, but never gets called out because she is the "good kind" of activist judge. |