Navy Elementary New Principal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Well um yeah so that's what I was saying. You value Asian diversity but not other kinds. You just validated my point and I never said they were the same, you just made that assumption. Just like all people from Europe, South America, and Africa are not the same, obviously Asia has a wide range of cultures and people. However, there is also diversity in economic status, genders, and neurotypical people. I'm not arguing in favor or against anything, I'm just calling you out because your bragging of diversity at navy is disingenuous and it hardly means navy is superior to crossfield.

Obviously I’m referring to race or ethnic background for diversity. That is primarily what one thinks of when talking about “diversity.” Socioeconomic status does not count. Nobody can tell how much money someone has simply by looking at them. No one can visually see whether a school is “socioeconomically” diverse. I can see with my own eyes that Crossfield is less diverse than Navy.

Highlighting this earlier post that you are ignoring:

Crossfield isn't all white, as much as you'd like to pretend it is. It has over 40% non-white population. Just because it's not Asian enough for you, does not mean it's not diverse. Anyone can look up school demographics here: .

The lower grades have more asian kids. Many asian kids transfer to Navy for AAP which skews the statistics making Navy more asian and Crossfield less asian.

This is a valid point. Would also like the point out that if anyone is being biased, it is the PP who seems to think that a school having a greater Asian population is superior to ones with smaller populations for that reason alone.

[Anonymous]

Omg this thread. I am so embarrassed to be a Navy parent right now. What a disgrace. To the kids. The teachers. The community. Everyone. Crossfield is a lovely school with lovely kids. Full stop. To the poster(s) who keep trying to stir things up: You’re an embarrassment. Please stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Omg this thread. I am so embarrassed to be a Navy parent right now. What a disgrace. To the kids. The teachers. The community. Everyone. Crossfield is a lovely school with lovely kids. Full stop. To the poster(s) who keep trying to stir things up: You’re an embarrassment. Please stop.

Oh shut up, Karen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg this thread. I am so embarrassed to be a Navy parent right now. What a disgrace. To the kids. The teachers. The community. Everyone. Crossfield is a lovely school with lovely kids. Full stop. To the poster(s) who keep trying to stir things up: You’re an embarrassment. Please stop.

Oh shut up, Karen.

Yeah, I don’t think that insult means what you think it does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

Maybe Harvard admissions was on to something after all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

Maybe Harvard admissions was on to something after all.

Haha! Cue the racist claiming woman...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

Good God, so thankful I’m not part of the Navy community. You guys are complete and utter nut jobs! Lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

Everyone knows Oakton is similar to Crossfield in terms of white kids. It wouldn’t be a rude awakening whatsoever. Less diverse, sure. But not a rude awakening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

Everyone knows Oakton is similar to Crossfield in terms of white kids. It wouldn’t be a rude awakening whatsoever. Less diverse, sure. But not a rude awakening.

What I've learned from this conversation is that it must be Navy mommies are completely clueless and don't know how to read critically, LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

Everyone knows Oakton is similar to Crossfield in terms of white kids. It wouldn’t be a rude awakening whatsoever. Less diverse, sure. But not a rude awakening.

What I've learned from this conversation is that it must be Navy mommies are completely clueless and don't know how to read critically, LOL

No one knows what you are talking about. This thread has gone off the rails.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

Everyone knows Oakton is similar to Crossfield in terms of white kids. It wouldn’t be a rude awakening whatsoever. Less diverse, sure. But not a rude awakening.

What I've learned from this conversation is that it must be Navy mommies are completely clueless and don't know how to read critically, LOL

No one knows what you are talking about. This thread has gone off the rails.

+1 Perhaps a Crossfield parent scorned?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

You seriously sound unhinged. A preference doesn’t mean there will be a “rude awakening” whatsoever. Do you realize that Navy is considered a split feeder? Some Navy kids will actually be going to Chantilly HS, which is very diverse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

You seriously sound unhinged. A preference doesn’t mean there will be a “rude awakening” whatsoever. Do you realize that Navy is considered a split feeder? Some Navy kids will actually be going to Chantilly HS, which is very diverse.

.

About time the "unhinged" lady re-emerged. Haha rude awakening! Since we are on the topic of diversity, Chantilly is actually pretty diverse in many ways including ses. They even have a program for kids that want to pursue vocational career paths.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We're a Crossfield family and said no to Navy AAP because of some of the crazy things we've heard.

Crossfield sucks. Very little diversity. Enjoy your bubble!

I love how Navy claims diversity just because it has wealthy Asian families. Neither school has any socioeconomic diversity whatsoever. Crossfield is about 30% Asian to Navy’s 60%.

Different people means diversity.

Unless you somehow think white people and Asian people are same.

+1 Crossfield has mostly white kids.

As do many other FCPS schools. Shall we begin bashing them, too. Oh, Oak Hill, you suck! Poplar Heights, you are the worst. F*ck you, Oakton and Waples Mill!!

This isn’t about other schools. Someone said they chose Crossfield AAP over Navy AAP. That’s fine if they want to stay with all the white kids. We love the diversity of Navy.

Of course only *high ses Asian* diversity. Not actual diversity. Give it a rest with the "diversity", tiger mom. You're not fooling anyone.

You're not fooling anyone that there is no diversity in Asians.

Indians, Koreans, and Chinese aren't the same.

That is actual diversity.

+1 and Navy has that, unlike Crossfield. I’d rather my kids go to a diverse school.

Your little snowflakes are in for a rude awakening when they get to Oakton. And they WILL go to Oakton. There's very little chance your baby is going to TJ like you hope and wish for.

Lol. Oakton is known for rich kids. It’s not the “rude” awakening you think it is.

You know we're talking about race here, right? Oakton is not majority Asian like Navy. Read.

Oakton is majority white. There is no rude awakening. Now if it were Herndon High, there would be one. Idiot.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? PP talks about how they prefer Navy because it is diverse (e.g. majority Asian) and Crossfield is bad because it's "not diverse" (e.g. only 40% non-white). Oakton is more similar to Crossfield than Navy. They'll hate it, it's not majority Asian.

Now do you understand you complete fool???

You seriously sound unhinged. A preference doesn’t mean there will be a “rude awakening” whatsoever. Do you realize that Navy is considered a split feeder? Some Navy kids will actually be going to Chantilly HS, which is very diverse.

.

About time the "unhinged" lady re-emerged. Haha rude awakening! Since we are on the topic of diversity, Chantilly is actually pretty diverse in many ways including ses. They even have a program for kids that want to pursue vocational career paths.

LOL, I actually did laugh out loud as soon as I read the word “unhinged.” there’s always one accusation in every thread.