Hunter - the right got what they wanted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember when Joe said he never talked to his son about his business?

Which time? He has said it multiple times.
He also said he didn't know his son was on the board of Burisma in a PBS interview in Nov., 2019.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching the Biden apologists squirming in this thread is entertaining to say that least. Watching the last 7 plus years of them chastising Trump and his family of the same things that was being done under Biden is quite humorous. The permanent beaurcracy protects their own... until they don't and why the swamp needs to be drained.

No this thread is some loser staffer on the Hill spamming unknown RWNJ Twitter posts. It is pathetic.

What a crock.
We know you are concerned about the allegations and what they may mean for Joe. We know your image of Joe as "middle class Joe" is being shattered with the allegations. We know it may hard for you to believe that the DOJ has put their finger on the scales of justice once again. And, we know that you are seeing that evidence is mounting that Garland may not have been honest in his testimony with Congress - either that or he is running an agency that is corrupt and he has no knowledge of what his employees are doing.
Just because there are people who are seeing and hearing the damning evidence and posting about it doesn't make them staffers on the hill.

I also think your accusation is nothing more than a projection..... LWNJ hill staff consistently post here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching the Biden apologists squirming in this thread is entertaining to say that least. Watching the last 7 plus years of them chastising Trump and his family of the same things that was being done under Biden is quite humorous. The permanent beaurcracy protects their own... until they don't and why the swamp needs to be drained.

No this thread is some loser staffer on the Hill spamming unknown RWNJ Twitter posts. It is pathetic.

What a crock.
We know you are concerned about the allegations and what they may mean for Joe. We know your image of Joe as "middle class Joe" is being shattered with the allegations. We know it may hard for you to believe that the DOJ has put their finger on the scales of justice once again. And, we know that you are seeing that evidence is mounting that Garland may not have been honest in his testimony with Congress - either that or he is running an agency that is corrupt and he has no knowledge of what his employees are doing.
Just because there are people who are seeing and hearing the damning evidence and posting about it doesn't make them staffers on the hill.

I also think your accusation is nothing more than a projection..... LWNJ hill staff consistently post here.

Lol “we”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching the Biden apologists squirming in this thread is entertaining to say that least. Watching the last 7 plus years of them chastising Trump and his family of the same things that was being done under Biden is quite humorous. The permanent beaurcracy protects their own... until they don't and why the swamp needs to be drained.

No this thread is some loser staffer on the Hill spamming unknown RWNJ Twitter posts. It is pathetic.

What a crock.
We know you are concerned about the allegations and what they may mean for Joe. We know your image of Joe as "middle class Joe" is being shattered with the allegations. We know it may hard for you to believe that the DOJ has put their finger on the scales of justice once again. And, we know that you are seeing that evidence is mounting that Garland may not have been honest in his testimony with Congress - either that or he is running an agency that is corrupt and he has no knowledge of what his employees are doing.
Just because there are people who are seeing and hearing the damning evidence and posting about it doesn't make them staffers on the hill.

I also think your accusation is nothing more than a projection..... LWNJ hill staff consistently post here.

Lol “we”?

Yes. "We." Those of us living in the land of reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching the Biden apologists squirming in this thread is entertaining to say that least. Watching the last 7 plus years of them chastising Trump and his family of the same things that was being done under Biden is quite humorous. The permanent beaurcracy protects their own... until they don't and why the swamp needs to be drained.

No this thread is some loser staffer on the Hill spamming unknown RWNJ Twitter posts. It is pathetic.

What a crock.
We know you are concerned about the allegations and what they may mean for Joe. We know your image of Joe as "middle class Joe" is being shattered with the allegations. We know it may hard for you to believe that the DOJ has put their finger on the scales of justice once again. And, we know that you are seeing that evidence is mounting that Garland may not have been honest in his testimony with Congress - either that or he is running an agency that is corrupt and he has no knowledge of what his employees are doing.
Just because there are people who are seeing and hearing the damning evidence and posting about it doesn't make them staffers on the hill.

I also think your accusation is nothing more than a projection..... LWNJ hill staff consistently post here.

Lol “we”?

Yes. "We." Those of us living in the land of reality.

Curious how "we" (not sure if you mean the royal "we" or are speaking for a specific group of people) feel when representatives of government entities "put their finger on the scales of justice" when it comes to Dems that Republicans hate. Is it okay to do in those circumstances? I hope that you will agree with me that it is not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching the Biden apologists squirming in this thread is entertaining to say that least. Watching the last 7 plus years of them chastising Trump and his family of the same things that was being done under Biden is quite humorous. The permanent beaurcracy protects their own... until they don't and why the swamp needs to be drained.

No this thread is some loser staffer on the Hill spamming unknown RWNJ Twitter posts. It is pathetic.

What a crock.
We know you are concerned about the allegations and what they may mean for Joe. We know your image of Joe as "middle class Joe" is being shattered with the allegations. We know it may hard for you to believe that the DOJ has put their finger on the scales of justice once again. And, we know that you are seeing that evidence is mounting that Garland may not have been honest in his testimony with Congress - either that or he is running an agency that is corrupt and he has no knowledge of what his employees are doing.
Just because there are people who are seeing and hearing the damning evidence and posting about it doesn't make them staffers on the hill.

I also think your accusation is nothing more than a projection..... LWNJ hill staff consistently post here.

Lol “we”?

Yes. "We." Those of us living in the land of reality.

Curious how "we" (not sure if you mean the royal "we" or are speaking for a specific group of people) feel when representatives of government entities "put their finger on the scales of justice" when it comes to Dems that Republicans hate. Is it okay to do in those circumstances? I hope that you will agree with me that it is not.

Of course it's not. But, it rarely goes that way.
And, the "we" I am speaking of are those who are posting information about the case that a pp accused of being staffers on the hill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Watching the Biden apologists squirming in this thread is entertaining to say that least. Watching the last 7 plus years of them chastising Trump and his family of the same things that was being done under Biden is quite humorous. The permanent beaurcracy protects their own... until they don't and why the swamp needs to be drained.

You must mistake laughter for squirming. It is hard to take you RWNJs seriously. Trump and his relatives are the real swamp but you won't cop to that. Typical GOP accusing the other side of what THEY are doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Watching the Biden apologists squirming in this thread is entertaining to say that least. Watching the last 7 plus years of them chastising Trump and his family of the same things that was being done under Biden is quite humorous. The permanent beaurcracy protects their own... until they don't and why the swamp needs to be drained.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching the Biden apologists squirming in this thread is entertaining to say that least. Watching the last 7 plus years of them chastising Trump and his family of the same things that was being done under Biden is quite humorous. The permanent beaurcracy protects their own... until they don't and why the swamp needs to be drained.

+1

In the light of the one more case that was dismissed today against Ivanka Trump in NYC, so true

[Anonymous]

Get the Trumps and the Biden’s. All crooks and sociopaths. ALL of them.

[Anonymous]

Facts kind of matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching the Biden apologists squirming in this thread is entertaining to say that least. Watching the last 7 plus years of them chastising Trump and his family of the same things that was being done under Biden is quite humorous. The permanent beaurcracy protects their own... until they don't and why the swamp needs to be drained.

No this thread is some loser staffer on the Hill spamming unknown RWNJ Twitter posts. It is pathetic.

What a crock.
We know you are concerned about the allegations and what they may mean for Joe. We know your image of Joe as "middle class Joe" is being shattered with the allegations. We know it may hard for you to believe that the DOJ has put their finger on the scales of justice once again. And, we know that you are seeing that evidence is mounting that Garland may not have been honest in his testimony with Congress - either that or he is running an agency that is corrupt and he has no knowledge of what his employees are doing.
Just because there are people who are seeing and hearing the damning evidence and posting about it doesn't make them staffers on the hill.

I also think your accusation is nothing more than a projection..... LWNJ hill staff consistently post here.

Lol “we”?

Yes. "We." Those of us living in the land of reality.

Curious how "we" (not sure if you mean the royal "we" or are speaking for a specific group of people) feel when representatives of government entities "put their finger on the scales of justice" when it comes to Dems that Republicans hate. Is it okay to do in those circumstances? I hope that you will agree with me that it is not.

Of course it's not. But, it rarely goes that way.
And, the "we" I am speaking of are those who are posting information about the case that a pp accused of being staffers on the hill.

Keep telling yourself that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

They were locked because the owner is a paid DNC shill, and there are political staffers on this site that censor. But now it’s too big to ignore. Even the WH press corps tried to get a straight answer of Pierre and couldn’t, they ganged up on her.

After years of fake allegations the media wheb apeshit reporting on everything. But here we have actual crimes and they’re silent.

The FBI whistleblowers, IRS whistleblowers, WH stenographers, Tony Bobawhatshisname…..all came out with evidence and the media and government suppressed it. These whistleblowers are real hero’s

Like indicted actual crimes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.