Honest to God, the CTCL hater has mental health issues. I was gonna say: St Olaf and Lawrence are a bit ‘reachy’ for safeties these days (knowing nothing about DS’s Stats). I think SMCM or similar makes some sense on that level. |
W&M OOS is tough. Even for guys. It’s definitely not a safety. |
Yes. Based on his stats, W&M is a target, though looking at Naviance everyone with his stats from his school has been accepted. Still we don’t see it as a safety, especially given how uncertain admissions has become overall. |
He has some of those on his list but they aren’t safeties. |
Pitt is a safety for many kids. Ithaca might be. |
I was actually going to suggest William and Mary even though it’s mid-sized. Great school! |
Ha! So what. - former Hoo |
I get that but to say he definitely won’t get in without knowing anything about him seems a bit absurd. |
So? The best he gets is thrown in with the uber competitive in state pool. Hardly a guarantee. |
In what world does Grinnell, with a 10 percent acceptance rate, qualify as a safety? Where do you people come from? |
Exactly what my DC is looking for but in the south! |
Would you please say something more about this. My DS at a DC private would love to go to W&M but not sure that he has the stats. What does it take of OOS and why is the reference to it being easier for a guy to get in? |
Many more women apply to W&M than men. Last year 8500+ women applied but only 5500 men, The acceptance rate was 46 percent for men but only 39 percent for women. |
| These gender-disparate application specifics are not unique to W&M. My older child applied to an Ivy a couple of years ago and the admissions and acceptance rates were wildly different by gender. Pretty much true everywhere. |
I don't believe for a minute that this is true. It's easy enough to verify, though. Identify the Ivy and provide a link to the numbers. Yes, many colleges have more women applying than men. But few have W&M's disparity, and most respond simply by accepting more women. |