Lindsay Graham being called out on Twitter for hiring male sex workers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be liberal about this. If he paid them what they asked for and tipped nicely on top of that what he does on his own time is kind of stormy danielsy. Give Lindsey a pass here.

I'm sure the Evangelicals will give him a mulligan. Oh wait, no.. that's only reserved for Trump.

Not anymore.

Man! I love that! That is so, so funny!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be liberal about this. If he paid them what they asked for and tipped nicely on top of that what he does on his own time is kind of stormy danielsy. Give Lindsey a pass here.

I'm sure the Evangelicals will give him a mulligan. Oh wait, no.. that's only reserved for Trump.

Not anymore.

Man! I love that! That is so, so funny!

Lovin it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Russians have been holding this over his head for a few years now. He must have crossed the Russians or Trump in some way.

Where did you find this information? Or are you just making it up on the fly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So conservative voters, who are into religion and family values, are fine with electing sexual predators left and right? Worse hypocrites who themselves are into what these conservatives call "perversions?"To represent their values in the government? Sure all are rumors that anonymous posted, but what pictures that #anonymous has!

Where are these pictures? Or are these "pictures," just like there was a "pee pee tape"?

[Anonymous]

OMG! Freedom of speech! They just removed the Jimmy Kimmel video!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So conservative voters, who are into religion and family values, are fine with electing sexual predators left and right? Worse hypocrites who themselves are into what these conservatives call "perversions?"To represent their values in the government? Sure all are rumors that anonymous posted, but what pictures that #anonymous has!

Where are these pictures? Or are these "pictures," just like there was a "pee pee tape"?

They are everywhere, you just don't follow the right twitter. Plus, how do you explain that that Jimmy Kimmel video just got taken down. One second played, the next not. Hm? How? Second amendment? Where is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Russians have been holding this over his head for a few years now. He must have crossed the Russians or Trump in some way.

Where did you find this information? Or are you just making it up on the fly?

Bingo. This is so fun. I could make up a really great story about any given topic. Just say the word!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be liberal about this. If he paid them what they asked for and tipped nicely on top of that what he does on his own time is kind of stormy danielsy. Give Lindsey a pass here.

I'm sure the Evangelicals will give him a mulligan. Oh wait, no.. that's only reserved for Trump.

Not anymore.

Man! I love that! That is so, so funny!

Lovin it.

This.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So conservative voters, who are into religion and family values, are fine with electing sexual predators left and right? Worse hypocrites who themselves are into what these conservatives call "perversions?"To represent their values in the government? Sure all are rumors that anonymous posted, but what pictures that #anonymous has!

Where are these pictures? Or are these "pictures," just like there was a "pee pee tape"?

They are everywhere, you just don't follow the right twitter. Plus, how do you explain that that Jimmy Kimmel video just got taken down. One second played, the next not. Hm? How? Second amendment? Where is it?

If there are pictures, and you actually expect us to believe it, then post them. As for the JK video, why are you asking me about it? I didn't remove it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So conservative voters, who are into religion and family values, are fine with electing sexual predators left and right? Worse hypocrites who themselves are into what these conservatives call "perversions?"To represent their values in the government? Sure all are rumors that anonymous posted, but what pictures that #anonymous has!

Where are these pictures? Or are these "pictures," just like there was a "pee pee tape"?

They are everywhere, you just don't follow the right twitter. Plus, how do you explain that that Jimmy Kimmel video just got taken down. One second played, the next not. Hm? How? Second amendment? Where is it?

2A?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outing people who are gay is wrong.

Outing hypocrites is always right.

No one gives a crap whether or not Lindsay Graham is gay. He's being outed for being a total scumbag hypocrite, and he deserves all the outing and shaming for that.

Then he shouldn't be "outed".

He is clearly being blackmailed. Maybe outing him would allow him to be true to himself and his conscious, rather than kowtowing to Trump.

And avoid a national threat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so ugly. Yes, the guy should be defeated at the ballot box. No, he won’t be in S Carolina. No, he has no spine after turning on his friend, McCain, and sucking up to Trump. Yes, he is the world’s biggest hypocrite.

But outing him like this is just ugly. I hope this story slinks back to the sewers where it belongs.

No. Honestly, it’s he and his ardent supporters who think this anything about his sexual orientation is ugly. He should not take advantage of these sex workers while supporting completely discriminatory policies in his office. The hypocrisy has to end. He and his supporters are the ones who have a problem with the truth. That’s on them.

DP. Could you list the "discriminatory policies" please. Be specific. Thanks.

Another DP.

The boldest is the most critical takeaway. You’re focusing on the wrong thing. As usual. Most people don’t GAF if he is gay. They do care if he is hypocritical. Because he had the power to oppress the very same choices that he exercises.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so ugly. Yes, the guy should be defeated at the ballot box. No, he won’t be in S Carolina. No, he has no spine after turning on his friend, McCain, and sucking up to Trump. Yes, he is the world’s biggest hypocrite.

But outing him like this is just ugly. I hope this story slinks back to the sewers where it belongs.

No. Honestly, it’s he and his ardent supporters who think this anything about his sexual orientation is ugly. He should not take advantage of these sex workers while supporting completely discriminatory policies in his office. The hypocrisy has to end. He and his supporters are the ones who have a problem with the truth. That’s on them.

DP. Could you list the "discriminatory policies" please. Be specific. Thanks.

Another DP.

The boldest is the most critical takeaway. You’re focusing on the wrong thing. As usual. Most people don’t GAF if he is gay. They do care if he is hypocritical. Because he had the power to oppress the very same choices that he exercises.

Mmkay, as expected, you didn't even answer the question. I have no idea what you're blabbering about, but it in no way answers the bolded question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So conservative voters, who are into religion and family values, are fine with electing sexual predators left and right? Worse hypocrites who themselves are into what these conservatives call "perversions?"To represent their values in the government? Sure all are rumors that anonymous posted, but what pictures that #anonymous has!

Where are these pictures? Or are these "pictures," just like there was a "pee pee tape"?

They are everywhere, you just don't follow the right twitter. Plus, how do you explain that that Jimmy Kimmel video just got taken down. One second played, the next not. Hm? How? Second amendment? Where is it?

2A?

Liberals can't even get their amendments straight. So much outrage!

[Anonymous]

What homophobic policies has LG supported? Everyone in the GOP knows he's gay. Everyone. But his sexual preferences aren't your business. Does he has to announce his orientation to you in order to be "really" gay? Is this like how Biden gets to decide who's black? If he slept with escorts and broke the law, fine, get him on that if you must. But he doesn't *owe* you an explanation of his sexual preferences. You don't expect straight politicians to do that and the only reason you'd expect this from a gay one is that you want to enforce a heteronormative, homophobic approach to sexual identity.