Yes, if he considers what he has now “nothing” then he won’t mind getting his ass dumped. Also we know nothing about frequency of their sex life. It is actually possible to have sex times and places other than at night in the marital bed. Also, the man doesn’t have to be on top. Crazy! But you go on with your weird obsession with how often other couples have sex. |
If you ever said this to my face after I explained my experience(s) to another individual, I would think you are an evil, haughty person who has reading and listening comprehension issues. Nothing about my post above is an excuse. It is an example of a family that has made co sleeping not be into 10/12 years old and that my DH gets his alone time while I put our son to sleep. We TRANSITIONED our son to his own bed at a year and half after FT co sleeping and he still wakes some nights- that's what I was detailing above I was also asking him to really consider what not co sleeping would really change about their marriage and evenings. Bc if it doesn't change those then it isn't worth asking for it to stop just because some people on the internet think its weird or he misses snuggling at night. He can still do that and it seems like he still does. |
This is just not true. You can have an active sex life and not sleep in the same bed. |
+1. We would be getting a divorce IMMEDIATELY. Men need to grow up. Babies need their mothers. Men don't need to be babied. They are adults. Men--if you don't want babies, don't get women pregnant!. Grow up. |
|
OP, you have two HOURS together after your child goes to bed, before your wife does. That’s not enough time to be intimate? Sorry, but “missing evenings together” is part of what you signed up for, being a parent to a young child.
Your children are your family now too, and your wife is more than a sex toy there to please you. Stop competing for attention Like your child is the enemy, and join in the family that you created. |
Thank you! I'm the PP. I find it frustrating that this thread has turned into a debate on the merits of co-sleeping (I'm a BabyWise mom, so you know where I stand!) when that's not relevant - the issue is that this man and his wife are on completely different pages, and he needs to become a partner in choosing their parenting path, whatever it may be. If they were both on board with cosleeping and attachment parenting, then great for them! The disconnect is the problem. |
Yes. Crunchy upper middle class liberal mom culture. |
Grenade thrown! Well played, troll, well played. |
I'm the PP (and the one who wrote that post with the four points) and I assure you, I am not a troll. My point stands - the merits of any particular parenting philosophy aren't relevant here. The issues is the disconnect. I wouldn't be doing BabyWise if my husband wasn't on board. Whether or not the people on this forum are on board (I know they're not!) is not relevant! But if this dad wants to get involved in these decisions (and he should!) he needs to do some research and think through what he wants. The other poster is right - if he's just thinking with his d*ck, that's not good enough. |
|
This is SO temporary. Why don’t you let DW cosleep with DS in YOUR room together. This is what DH and I did. And it is soooo boring to think you can only have baby #2 (and lots of fun!) in the bedroom at night. We coslept for 24 months for each kid and had 3 kids. Now our youngest is 10 and our oldest is 14. It’s over. That was 6 cherished years of our lives but it’s a blink and gone. It’s so stereotypical to think that DH can’t be nurturing to the son with what your child needs. Children are supposed to be nursed for 24 months. It’s fine if that’s not what DW wanted with her body but if it is what she wants, why are we fighting her? Feminism means letting women be full moms, too, not just be baby making machines that go back to work and the bedroom.
I did it all - cloth diapers, growing and making (and freezing) by own baby food. I fully experienced motherhood and it was AWESOME. And so when I went back to work (big law with on-ramp), I could guiltlessly succeed there (no, you cannot be a hands on mommy and a lawyer) because my husband supported me at home and I knew my kids got those 10 years (my youngest got 6) of me being at home. Do not push your wife away. Embrace her or you’ll lose her. She is right here - this is what real feminism looks like. |
This is the most hilarious attempt at a mommy war troll I've ever read. OP said nothing about feminism, breastfeeding, or baby food, his wife works outside the home already, and this clown comes in to take up DW's side by ... calling her a terrible mom and saying that OP's wife would agree because it's the feminist POV.
|
|
OP, if you want another baby I have news for you. The co-sleeping might get worse.
We put DS1 in his own room at about 1yr. He was a terrible sleeper and would wake up super early. We were all exhausted. With DS2, it was purely divide and conquer, survival mode from the get go. My H dealt with DS1's wake ups, while I co-slept with DS2 in a separate room. It was the best way for us to maximize sleep and we are not alone in this practice. DS2 ended up co-sleeping with me for 3 years. In the meantime, we find ways to be intimate, but at the end of the night, sleep, however we get it, is the top priority. And it does not mean your marriage is doomed. I view the first 2-3 years of our children's lives as do anything to survive. You'll get through it. |
Nope. The range of women in my groups that are pro-co sleeping is astounding. older moms, young moms, mid 30s moms, rich, poor, white, black, Asian, Hispanic, extended breastfeeding, not extended breastfeeding, in the US, international, etc. Maybe they all are liberal but we don't discuss politics. That could be the thread that binds us.
|
|
Wait, what are you doing in the hour or two you have between putting the kid down and your wife goes to bed?
Your post makes no sense. It sounds like you do have time together. |
These are the only two criteria you list that PP identified. You list a whole bunch of other criteria that PP didn't mention. In other words, you agree with PP because you've failed to refute his/her statement. |