new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

They should be believed if their account is believable. If a woman says your house is on fire and you can see it's not, it doesn't mean you have to call 911.

You are full of it. Own it.

Say the one who voted for the pu$$y-grabber.

Hypocrite you are.

As Democrats, we either support women or not. Obviously not.

Supporting mean believe them but verify the report. In this case, the story has shifted, witnesses have not backed the story and the Putin love/BernieBros support undermine the whole thing. Biden has not maligned Ms. Reade in any way.

The truth? When there is a credible allegation, let us know.

And no, Bernie will not be our nominee. The voters rejected him soundly.

[Anonymous]

Biden could not have been more clear. He gave himself no wiggle room. And while making his case, he didn't degrade Reade and said Reade deserved to be heard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on twitter brought up a valid point. She claims to have also been a senate staffer at the time and recalled that the dress code required women to wear pantyhose with skirts. Those of us who are old enough to remember pantyhose can verify that they were constricting enough to practically cut off circulation. It is hard to imagine that he was able to reach up her skirt and inside pantyhose far enough to penetrate. Especially while standing up in a hallway where someone could have walked by at anytime.

And apparently her allegations mention her *bare* legs...

This is lame point, PP. It’s perfectly reasonable to think she would have *gasp* not be wearing pantyhose or taken them off. Come on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

They should be believed if their account is believable. If a woman says your house is on fire and you can see it's not, it doesn't mean you have to call 911.

You are full of it. Own it.

Say the one who voted for the pu$$y-grabber.

Hypocrite you are.

As Democrats, we either support women or not. Obviously not.

This. It’s not too late to let Bernie be nominee, is it? If media and Dems don’t sweep this under the rug and really go after Biden. Force Vuden to withdraw? Bernie has never had any sexual misconduct accusation thrown at him. What, exactly, do we stand for if we sweep this under the rug?

Neither has Biden until now. Don't be so sure your boy wouldn't face the same had he been the nominee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

They should be believed if their account is believable. If a woman says your house is on fire and you can see it's not, it doesn't mean you have to call 911.

You are full of it. Own it.

Say the one who voted for the pu$$y-grabber.

Hypocrite you are.

As Democrats, we either support women or not. Obviously not.

Who says Democrats are supposed to support all women? What a ridiculous statement. I don’t support women who lie, women trump supporters, etc.

Women who have been sexually assaulted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

They should be believed if their account is believable. If a woman says your house is on fire and you can see it's not, it doesn't mean you have to call 911.

You are full of it. Own it.

Say the one who voted for the pu$$y-grabber.

Hypocrite you are.

As Democrats, we either support women or not. Obviously not.

This. It’s not too late to let Bernie be nominee, is it? If media and Dems don’t sweep this under the rug and really go after Biden. Force Vuden to withdraw? Bernie has never had any sexual misconduct accusation thrown at him. What, exactly, do we stand for if we sweep this under the rug?

Neither has Biden until now. Don't be so sure your boy wouldn't face the same had he been the nominee.

Biden has been known to inappropriately touch/be too touchy with women. Until now, everyone swept it under rug and brushed it aside “for the greater good” of defeating Trump.

Sad to think Biden was the best we could do in terms of nominee. Damn apologists for bad behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on twitter brought up a valid point. She claims to have also been a senate staffer at the time and recalled that the dress code required women to wear pantyhose with skirts. Those of us who are old enough to remember pantyhose can verify that they were constricting enough to practically cut off circulation. It is hard to imagine that he was able to reach up her skirt and inside pantyhose far enough to penetrate. Especially while standing up in a hallway where someone could have walked by at anytime.

And apparently her allegations mention her *bare* legs...

She actually addressed this in the original complaint saying it was a hot day and she was not wearing any. She specifically mentions it.

Hot enough in DC in early spring to break dress code rules? Around the time that DC experienced a huge snow storm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on twitter brought up a valid point. She claims to have also been a senate staffer at the time and recalled that the dress code required women to wear pantyhose with skirts. Those of us who are old enough to remember pantyhose can verify that they were constricting enough to practically cut off circulation. It is hard to imagine that he was able to reach up her skirt and inside pantyhose far enough to penetrate. Especially while standing up in a hallway where someone could have walked by at anytime.

And apparently her allegations mention her *bare* legs...

This is lame point, PP. It’s perfectly reasonable to think she would have *gasp* not be wearing pantyhose or taken them off. Come on.

100% did NOT happen in 1993. Pantyhose were worn ALL THE TIME. NO ONE walked around the Capitol with bare legs. Just wasn't done. I know, I spent time there in 1993.

The only way this could've happened was if she was wearing stockings with a garter belt or thigh high hose. I didn't know she said she had bare legs - that tells me she's not being truthful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on twitter brought up a valid point. She claims to have also been a senate staffer at the time and recalled that the dress code required women to wear pantyhose with skirts. Those of us who are old enough to remember pantyhose can verify that they were constricting enough to practically cut off circulation. It is hard to imagine that he was able to reach up her skirt and inside pantyhose far enough to penetrate. Especially while standing up in a hallway where someone could have walked by at anytime.

And apparently her allegations mention her *bare* legs...

This is lame point, PP. It’s perfectly reasonable to think she would have *gasp* not be wearing pantyhose or taken them off. Come on.

Not if it was *gasp* against dress code. According to another pp, she claimed that it was too hot (in early spring) to follow dress code.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

They should be believed if their account is believable. If a woman says your house is on fire and you can see it's not, it doesn't mean you have to call 911.

You are full of it. Own it.

Say the one who voted for the pu$$y-grabber.

Hypocrite you are.

As Democrats, we either support women or not. Obviously not.

This. It’s not too late to let Bernie be nominee, is it? If media and Dems don’t sweep this under the rug and really go after Biden. Force Vuden to withdraw? Bernie has never had any sexual misconduct accusation thrown at him. What, exactly, do we stand for if we sweep this under the rug?

Neither has Biden until now. Don't be so sure your boy wouldn't face the same had he been the nominee.

Biden has been known to inappropriately touch/be too touchy with women. Until now, everyone swept it under rug and brushed it aside “for the greater good” of defeating Trump.

Sad to think Biden was the best we could do in terms of nominee. Damn apologists for bad behavior.

Trump didn't come on the scene until 2016. So everyone swept it under the rug for 35+ years of Biden's career to defeat Trump? That doesn't even make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on twitter brought up a valid point. She claims to have also been a senate staffer at the time and recalled that the dress code required women to wear pantyhose with skirts. Those of us who are old enough to remember pantyhose can verify that they were constricting enough to practically cut off circulation. It is hard to imagine that he was able to reach up her skirt and inside pantyhose far enough to penetrate. Especially while standing up in a hallway where someone could have walked by at anytime.

And apparently her allegations mention her *bare* legs...

This is lame point, PP. It’s perfectly reasonable to think she would have *gasp* not be wearing pantyhose or taken them off. Come on.

Not if it was *gasp* against dress code. According to another pp, she claimed that it was too hot (in early spring) to follow dress code.

I don’t understand your rebuttal. She said she wasn’t wearing stockings. She could have taken off her stockings for any reason — a run, too hot, whatever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

They should be believed if their account is believable. If a woman says your house is on fire and you can see it's not, it doesn't mean you have to call 911.

You are full of it. Own it.

Say the one who voted for the pu$$y-grabber.

Hypocrite you are.

As Democrats, we either support women or not. Obviously not.

This. It’s not too late to let Bernie be nominee, is it? If media and Dems don’t sweep this under the rug and really go after Biden. Force Vuden to withdraw? Bernie has never had any sexual misconduct accusation thrown at him. What, exactly, do we stand for if we sweep this under the rug?

Neither has Biden until now. Don't be so sure your boy wouldn't face the same had he been the nominee.

Yeah, you're dreaming if you think somehow Bernie would ascend and the Republican smear machine would just be like, "oh, well, obviously we're not playing dirty with THIS guy!"

[Anonymous]

His reaction to the questions about the records at U of Delaware was not a good look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

They should be believed if their account is believable. If a woman says your house is on fire and you can see it's not, it doesn't mean you have to call 911.

You are full of it. Own it.

Say the one who voted for the pu$$y-grabber.

Hypocrite you are.

As Democrats, we either support women or not. Obviously not.

This. It’s not too late to let Bernie be nominee, is it? If media and Dems don’t sweep this under the rug and really go after Biden. Force Vuden to withdraw? Bernie has never had any sexual misconduct accusation thrown at him. What, exactly, do we stand for if we sweep this under the rug?

Neither has Biden until now. Don't be so sure your boy wouldn't face the same had he been the nominee.

Biden has been known to inappropriately touch/be too touchy with women. Until now, everyone swept it under rug and brushed it aside “for the greater good” of defeating Trump.

Sad to think Biden was the best we could do in terms of nominee. Damn apologists for bad behavior.

Trump didn't come on the scene until 2016. So everyone swept it under the rug for 35+ years of Biden's career to defeat Trump? That doesn't even make sense.

I’m talking about how Biden has basically gotten a free pass during this election cycle for being “handsy” with women because he is the most viable candidate against Trump. Finally some mainstream media are seriously looking at Reade accusations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

They should be believed if their account is believable. If a woman says your house is on fire and you can see it's not, it doesn't mean you have to call 911.

You are full of it. Own it.

Say the one who voted for the pu$$y-grabber.

Hypocrite you are.

As Democrats, we either support women or not. Obviously not.

This. It’s not too late to let Bernie be nominee, is it? If media and Dems don’t sweep this under the rug and really go after Biden. Force Vuden to withdraw? Bernie has never had any sexual misconduct accusation thrown at him. What, exactly, do we stand for if we sweep this under the rug?

Neither has Biden until now. Don't be so sure your boy wouldn't face the same had he been the nominee.

Yeah, you're dreaming if you think somehow Bernie would ascend and the Republican smear machine would just be like, "oh, well, obviously we're not playing dirty with THIS guy!"

Biden has always been known as handsy/creepy with women. Bernie definitely does not have this reputation m.