Shook by friends new baby at 44

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Odd is the handful of 70-80 yr olds that you're all voting in to run the country.

they seem to enough energy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shaken, not shook. Jeez.

Unnecessary useless response. Jeez.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oop, here comes all the old mommies to talk about SES, and energy levels.

Here come the young moms to justify the fact that they spent the best years of their lives chasing kids and changing diapers while the rest of us traveled and lived it up. Awww.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They had THREE kids before age 24????

That’s the weirdest thing about this story by far.

Nobody does that in this day and age.

People thought I was young having my first at 27! You’d have thought I was a teenager by their reactions.

Oh pipe down. I had two at 24. I was happily married, educated and a home owner. Some of us mature faster I guess.

Facts are most highly educated people of a certain socioeconomic level are not having their kids by age 24 anymore. It's very regional too. But surely you must know that. So yes, in DC proper and inner ring more expensive suburbs, a woman is young to have a baby at 27. It's not about you. It's called data.

This was 20+ years ago...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shaken, not shook. Jeez.

It’s slang, Grandma. Not OP, btw.

It's stupid slang. You guys sound like idiots with your slang use of past tense.

[Anonymous]

OP, you realize that there are things you can do to (a) avoid getting pregnant and (b) stop being pregnant, right?

[Anonymous]

Totally off topic, but please never use the word "shook" with "baby" in the same sentence. I read this as "Shook my friends new baby at 44" lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They had THREE kids before age 24????

That’s the weirdest thing about this story by far.

Nobody does that in this day and age.

People thought I was young having my first at 27! You’d have thought I was a teenager by their reactions.

Oh pipe down. I had two at 24. I was happily married, educated and a home owner. Some of us mature faster I guess.

Facts are most highly educated people of a certain socioeconomic level are not having their kids by age 24 anymore. It's very regional too. But surely you must know that. So yes, in DC proper and inner ring more expensive suburbs, a woman is young to have a baby at 27. It's not about you. It's called data.

This was 20+ years ago...

My kids are 17-23 (4 of them) and the same was true 20 years ago. I had my first at 27 and was by far the youngest of my peers. With my oldest in particular, I am really always the youngest parent by a good margin.

[Anonymous]

Why would someone else choosing to have a baby at that age scare you? You don’t have to follow suit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Totally off topic, but please never use the word "shook" with "baby" in the same sentence. I read this as "Shook my friends new baby at 44" lol.

+1.
It took me a minute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would someone else choosing to have a baby at that age scare you? You don’t have to follow suit.

exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oop, here comes all the old mommies to talk about SES, and energy levels.

Here come the young moms to justify the fact that they spent the best years of their lives chasing kids and changing diapers while the rest of us traveled and lived it up. Awww.

Sing it sister! I would not give up my advanced degrees, my time overseas or my old boyfriends for anything. When I did settle down I did it right. And I do have plenty of energy to keep up with my kids.

[Anonymous]

If you have sex, you sometimes get babies whether you use protection or not.

I was hoping for a midlife baby, but it was not to be.

[Anonymous]

I am surprised by people's experience having babies at 27. I was 30 when I had my first in D.C. and no one thought it was young. And it wasn't. Does 3 years really make a difference?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Totally off topic, but please never use the word "shook" with "baby" in the same sentence. I read this as "Shook my friends new baby at 44" lol.

+1.
It took me a minute.

+2. Same.