Sussex Christmas card 2019
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
also, the baby is whatever - a baby. not particularly cute but that's not his fault poor thing. |
Anonymous
|
This is really, really weird —- seems like Getty Images ordered at “media kill” on using the Sussex Christmas photo. It cannot be used anymore—
https://www.gettyimages.no/detail/news-photo/please-kill-this-photograph-royal-sussex-23423421-news-photo/1190441169 |
Anonymous
So I’m wondering if that was their actual Christmas card? It was promoted/announced by their good friend, royal reporter Omid Scobie. So bizarre. |
Anonymous
The Sussexes are so lame. Sheesh. |
Anonymous
My guess is that they got so much criticism for the alleged photoshop fail that they are trying to stop it from further publication. Good luck with that. |
Anonymous
| These two are drama central. Who cares if it’s photoshopped or not. They need to stop reacting to every stupid thing. |
Anonymous
You are deliberately obtuse and just want to dump on them. The PA explanation is right there: the image that is canceled is the altered one, not sourced from the Sussexes. |
Anonymous
So you wouldn’t care if a photo you sent out was photoshopped then criticized as though you did the photoshopping? Umm ok. |
Anonymous
Agree with PP. These two are so hypersensitive and victimized. They are royalling wrong. |
Anonymous
| Does anyone think the baby looks Asian? |
Anonymous
Neither image is present on the Queen's desk for her Christmas address. Sorry, Meghan... |
Anonymous
I'm an NP, btw. |
Anonymous
| Not a great picture at all. |
Anonymous
Yes. |
Anonymous
He just looks cross-eyed to me. Hope they fix that, for his sake. |