Sussex Christmas card 2019

[Anonymous]

Why would she photoshop herself? This constant picking apart of every little thing having to do with Meghan just proves her point about the unfair treatment. Basic courtesy is never extended. I said this in the other thread but the tabloids are just upset because they sent the picture to staff and friends via email and family via hard copy without releasing it to the press first.

[Anonymous]

It's a nice picture. I am pretty indifferent to all royals (as in, don't like or dislike any) but Archie is a cute little guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html

Daily Mail altered Meghan’s face on the card to make it look photoshopped. Here’s the real one, where her face is just as blurry as Harry’s:

https://mobile.twitter.com/queenscomtrust/status/1209241848411303941

Wow. That's downright evil.

Well, it is a racist rag that hates Meghan for being black and hates Harry for marrying someone black.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m a big fan of them but I don’t like this picture. The giant baby face is weird to me.

Agree. Like them. Weird card.

[Anonymous]

Creepy

[Anonymous]

That is not a flattering picture of their child. Not a fan.

[Anonymous]

Everyone uses photoshop these days NBD

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That is not a flattering picture of their child. Not a fan.

This. If you’re a Seinfeld fan, you’ll agree that this baby is...breathtaking.

[Anonymous]

Everyone has been commenting saying the kid has a lazy eye or something. They say it’s apparent in person and that this photo shows it (I don’t see it). They say they’re embarrassed about it and that’s why they don’t show off their baby or let anyone take pics. If that’s true it’s a bit sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone has been commenting saying the kid has a lazy eye or something. They say it’s apparent in person and that this photo shows it (I don’t see it). They say they’re embarrassed about it and that’s why they don’t show off their baby or let anyone take pics. If that’s true it’s a bit sad.

their cousin Lady Louise had crossed eyes too that they fixed with surgery: https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1201911/sophie-wessex-daughter-queen-granddaughter-lady-louise-windsor-birthday

[Anonymous]

“Lazy eyes” are actually not uncommon in infants. I doubt they are embarrassed about that. I think they don’t show him off because they obviously have some beef with the press.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html

Daily Mail altered Meghan’s face on the card to make it look photoshopped. Here’s the real one, where her face is just as blurry as Harry’s:

https://mobile.twitter.com/queenscomtrust/status/1209241848411303941

And Daily Fail is in Kate's pocket.

Wow. That's downright evil.

Well, it is a racist rag that hates Meghan for being black and hates Harry for marrying someone black.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html

Daily Mail altered Meghan’s face on the card to make it look photoshopped. Here’s the real one, where her face is just as blurry as Harry’s:

https://mobile.twitter.com/queenscomtrust/status/1209241848411303941

Wow. That's downright evil.

Well, it is a racist rag that hates Meghan for being black and hates Harry for marrying someone black.

But like...they aren’t concerned with being sued again?

[Anonymous]

Cute baby.

[Anonymous]

They emailed it/posted it rather than printing it because they want to control the commerce: they didn’t want anyone reselling the hardcopy.