Sussex Christmas card 2019

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is not a flattering picture of their child. Not a fan.

This. If you’re a Seinfeld fan, you’ll agree that this baby is...breathtaking.

Here is the thing, this comment can refer to 99% of babies. Most aren’t anything to look at.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html

Daily Mail altered Meghan’s face on the card to make it look photoshopped. Here’s the real one, where her face is just as blurry as Harry’s:

https://mobile.twitter.com/queenscomtrust/status/1209241848411303941

Wow. That's downright evil.

Well, it is a racist rag that hates Meghan for being black and hates Harry for marrying someone black.

But like...they aren’t concerned with being sued again?

Whatever fee they have to pay will be a wash with an increase in leadership and therefore advertisers.

[Anonymous]

Archie is a cutie - wtf saying he's "breathtaking"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m a big fan of them but I don’t like this picture. The giant baby face is weird to me.

Agree. I like them but this isn’t cute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Archie is a cutie - wtf saying he's "breathtaking"?

If you don’t get the reference, you don’t get the reference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Archie is a cutie - wtf saying he's "breathtaking"?

If you don’t get the reference, you don’t get the reference.

No, we get the reference and disagree with you calling him an ugly baby. I see you.

[Anonymous]

Yuck

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html

Yes, it clearly was.

I’m not a big fan of jumping in her for some things, but in this case her face was clearly photoshopped. Look at the fuzziness of her sweater compared to her face. It is clearly two different pictures. It is unfortunate because they get so much unnecessary heat, but this is just so vain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html

Yes, it clearly was.

I’m not a big fan of jumping in her for some things, but in this case her face was clearly photoshopped. Look at the fuzziness of her sweater compared to her face. It is clearly two different pictures. It is unfortunate because they get so much unnecessary heat, but this is just so vain.

The Daily Mail version was altered from the original issued by Meghan and Harry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html

Yes, it clearly was.

I’m not a big fan of jumping in her for some things, but in this case her face was clearly photoshopped. Look at the fuzziness of her sweater compared to her face. It is clearly two different pictures. It is unfortunate because they get so much unnecessary heat, but this is just so vain.

The Daily Mail version was altered from the original issued by Meghan and Harry.

Shades of Diana (who I really liked but...) encouraging the press to do something and then playing the innocent victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html

Yes, it clearly was.

I’m not a big fan of jumping in her for some things, but in this case her face was clearly photoshopped. Look at the fuzziness of her sweater compared to her face. It is clearly two different pictures. It is unfortunate because they get so much unnecessary heat, but this is just so vain.

The Daily Mail version was altered from the original issued by Meghan and Harry.

Shades of Diana (who I really liked but...) encouraging the press to do something and then playing the innocent victim.

Huh? Are you saying Harry and Meghan asked Daily Mail to photoshop the card they released and then fabricate a story about then photoshopping their own card in order to look like victims when people finally figured out that the Daily Mail version was different from the official version?

[Anonymous]

Some of you are extremely hateful individuals. Period. Whatever you have to say to justify your nastiness, go right ahead. But deep down, you are truly terrible people. Meghan Markle will NEVER be able to do anything to please most of the previous posters on this thread. You can blame whatever sham reason you have but the truth is very obvious. What is her heinous crime this time? What has she done to deserve the vitriol being thrown her family’s way? Shameful.

That baby is cute. He’s not the best looking child to ever be born but he’s perfectly fine. The picture they released wasn’t photoshopped, Daily Mail altered it in order to make it seem as if Meghan was focused and Harry was blurry. In reality both adults are a little blurry so that the baby can be the primary focus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are extremely hateful individuals. Period. Whatever you have to say to justify your nastiness, go right ahead. But deep down, you are truly terrible people. Meghan Markle will NEVER be able to do anything to please most of the previous posters on this thread. You can blame whatever sham reason you have but the truth is very obvious. What is her heinous crime this time? What has she done to deserve the vitriol being thrown her family’s way? Shameful.

That baby is cute. He’s not the best looking child to ever be born but he’s perfectly fine. The picture they released wasn’t photoshopped, Daily Mail altered it in order to make it seem as if Meghan was focused and Harry was blurry. In reality both adults are a little blurry so that the baby can be the primary focus.

Yeah I’m not a MM fan but this isn’t on her and Harry. Card is fine, Archie is cute and DM acted poorly with the photoshop. I hope they are taking this period to rest and recharge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html

Yes, it clearly was.

I’m not a big fan of jumping in her for some things, but in this case her face was clearly photoshopped. Look at the fuzziness of her sweater compared to her face. It is clearly two different pictures. It is unfortunate because they get so much unnecessary heat, but this is just so vain.

The Daily Mail version was altered from the original issued by Meghan and Harry.

Shades of Diana (who I really liked but...) encouraging the press to do something and then playing the innocent victim.

Huh? Are you saying Harry and Meghan asked Daily Mail to photoshop the card they released and then fabricate a story about then photoshopping their own card in order to look like victims when people finally figured out that the Daily Mail version was different from the official version?

The PP won't let go of blaming Meghan for anything, whether based in fact or not.

Here is the twitter exchange where a fan says she tweaked the image and that was what the Fail used, not the actual unaltered photo. They are truly sick. I think the person who did it has no deleted her account but her tweet was captured here.

https://twitter.com/Aqarius_girl/status/1209574284659691520

[Anonymous]

Meh- I am not a fan of hers or her card but whatever - this card is fairly innocuous and doesn't seem to have some ulterior motive. Its a Christmas card people - move on