Montgomery County quietly ends it’s sanctuary policies and will now notify ICE

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?


My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.


If you kid is > 16 I’m sure he has done something illegal. 40 in a 35


It cracks me up when someone equates going 5 MPH over the speed limit to entering the country illegally.
It proves you have no argument.


It cracks me up when people think coming to the country illegally is criminal... it’s not, it’s civil. Yet your progeny will drinking underage and smoke pot which is actually criminal.... but you think it’s a lesser offense.


Criminal vs. civil is irrelevant. If they are here illegally, they have to go back.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?


Uh, the probable cause is that they are not here legally


Except no one checks ICE detainers for probable cause that the person is actually here illegally, and ICE gets it wrong all the time meaning American citizens get detained illegally. The county should absolutely ignore a "detainer" that amounts to one ICE officer saying "I think he's deportable, trust me" because it's constitutionally meaningless.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?


My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.


If you kid is > 16 I’m sure he has done something illegal. 40 in a 35


It cracks me up when someone equates going 5 MPH over the speed limit to entering the country illegally.
It proves you have no argument.


It cracks me up when people think coming to the country illegally is criminal... it’s not, it’s civil. Yet your progeny will drinking underage and smoke pot which is actually criminal.... but you think it’s a lesser offense.


Criminal vs. civil is irrelevant. If they are here illegally, they have to go back.


Nobody is arguing against that. Just stating you can’t violate their constitutional rights by holding them without probable cause.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?


My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.


If you kid is > 16 I’m sure he has done something illegal. 40 in a 35


It cracks me up when someone equates going 5 MPH over the speed limit to entering the country illegally.
It proves you have no argument.


It cracks me up when people think coming to the country illegally is criminal... it’s not, it’s civil. Yet your progeny will drinking underage and smoke pot which is actually criminal.... but you think it’s a lesser offense.


Criminal vs. civil is irrelevant. If they are here illegally, they have to go back.


Yes it is relevant. No they do not have to go back. If they commit a criminal act they must go back, a civil act they don't have to go back... that is the law.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?


Uh, the probable cause is that they are not here legally


The only probable cause you have is that they are Hispanic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?


Uh, the probable cause is that they are not here legally


The only probable cause you have is that they are Hispanic.
another democrat who thinks hispanic and illegal alien are synonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I thought liberals could learn something. Apparently not even when little girls are the victims.

Libs will care only when their own little white girls are raped.


When will republicans care?

They’re indifferent when their little white children are murdered in their suburban schools.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?


Uh, the probable cause is that they are not here legally


The only probable cause you have is that they are Hispanic.
another democrat who thinks hispanic and illegal alien are synonymous

some Trumpsters seem to think so, while shouting "why are you invading my country".. a line Trump likes to quote.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/milwaukee-acid-attack-hispanic-man-attacked-with-acid-questioned-about-citizenship-suspect-in-custody/

And of course, they are using the mental illness defense for a white man. His only mental deficiency is that he's a Trumpster.

https://www.nbc15.com/content/news/Man-accused-of-tossing-acid-on-Latino-due-in-Milwaukee-court-564974422.html
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: