Montgomery County quietly ends it’s sanctuary policies and will now notify ICE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?

My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.

If you kid is > 16 I’m sure he has done something illegal. 40 in a 35

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?

My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.

If you kid is > 16 I’m sure he has done something illegal. 40 in a 35

It cracks me up when someone equates going 5 MPH over the speed limit to entering the country illegally.
It proves you have no argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?

My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.

If you kid is > 16 I’m sure he has done something illegal. 40 in a 35

It cracks me up when someone equates going 5 MPH over the speed limit to entering the country illegally.
It proves you have no argument.

It cracks me up when people think coming to the country illegally is criminal... it’s not, it’s civil. Yet your progeny will drinking underage and smoke pot which is actually criminal.... but you think it’s a lesser offense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I thought liberals could learn something. Apparently not even when little girls are the victims.

Libs will care only when their own little white girls are raped.

YAWN.

People commit crimes. Some of them are from other countries. Wow. And water is wet.

People in the White House commit crimes, too. Where's your outrage for the "little girls" Trump's friend raped on an island?

Oops, your racism is showing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?

so you oppose holding them for extradition to other states for crimes committed in other states ?

Those detainers are for crimes and babe probable cause. Signed off by a judge. ICE detainers are almost always civil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?

My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.

Rights for all or rights for none. That’s the whole reason we have the 14th amendment.

[Anonymous]

I'm liberal, but I'm over the whole everyone can come here whenever or why ever they want. I support deporting rapists or at least holding people who are flight risks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm liberal, but I'm over the whole everyone can come here whenever or why ever they want. I support deporting rapists or at least holding people who are flight risks.

Literally nobody is for open borders. But most people are for constitutional rights.

But you all win. He was on home electronic monitoring for the county charge. Might have gone to prison. But now he’s in ICE custody and may get bailed out on their charges. They release people on bail ALL THE TIME. Only to disappear. Or get deported and simply come back. Such a win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?

My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.

Rights for all or rights for none. That’s the whole reason we have the 14th amendment.

Wrong, the 14th amendment was meant for American slaves who were brought here unjustly and were apart of the cornerstones of this country. This country was built off of their blood, sweat and tears which is why they were granted the 14th amendment because it was recognized that the American slaves contributed heavily to our society. It was not meant for people who illegally come here and undercut citizen wages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?

My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.

Rights for all or rights for none. That’s the whole reason we have the 14th amendment.

Wrong, the 14th amendment was meant for American slaves who were brought here unjustly and were apart of the cornerstones of this country. This country was built off of their blood, sweat and tears which is why they were granted the 14th amendment because it was recognized that the American slaves contributed heavily to our society. It was not meant for people who illegally come here and undercut citizen wages.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?

My kid is LEGAL. And NOT A CHILD RAPIST.

Rights for all or rights for none. That’s the whole reason we have the 14th amendment.

Wrong, the 14th amendment was meant for American slaves who were brought here unjustly and were apart of the cornerstones of this country. This country was built off of their blood, sweat and tears which is why they were granted the 14th amendment because it was recognized that the American slaves contributed heavily to our society. It was not meant for people who illegally come here and undercut citizen wages.

The courts disagree with you. Repeatedly.

[Anonymous]

https://time.com/5727804/grand-rapids-latino-citizen-ice/

Another jurisdiction has to settle because it honored a ICE detainer. Thank God our tax dollars aren't paying to support ICE's mistakes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Took what, 11 sex crimes, including of children, for them to perhaps consider it might not be a good idea?

https://wjla.com/news/local/montgomery-county-reverses-policy-banning-ice-jail

Oh please.

Let's talk about who has more sex crimes. Catholic Church ring a bell? Or how about those Or how about those Southern Baptists https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/investigations/article/Southern-Baptist-sexual-abuse-spreads-as-leaders-13588038.php

I don't condone someone coming to the US illegally, but fear mongering not ok..

Not to worry. Anyone who wants to elude the law will come to Arlington with the new Commonwealth Attorney who will not charge them with a crime. All the problems MoCo had with its sanctuary cities will be transferred to Arlington.

Wrong Virginia County. Destination will be Fairfax County for the DMV. FX plans to provide daycare and pre school from birth until kindergarten for all below the 300% poverty level. year round and extended day. That is nowhere else and the revenue they need for it annually is over 300 million. That is the estimated portion paid for with local taxes which already use well over 100 m. This excludes facilities and transportation.

Also FX plans to increase the illegal immigration defense funds allocated to organizations through the community services board. That amount was 200k and a out of cycle allocation. MOCO screened for whom the money would be used and FX apparently isn't going to do that. All roads lead to Fairfax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I thought liberals could learn something. Apparently not even when little girls are the victims.

Libs will care only when their own little white girls are raped.

YAWN.

People commit crimes. Some of them are from other countries. Wow. And water is wet.

People in the White House commit crimes, too. Where's your outrage for the "little girls" Trump's friend raped on an island?

Oops, your racism is showing.

Seems to me the story that was buried implicated prominent liberals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So you are ok with violating someone’s constitutional rights? Just keep them in jail with no probable cause? Would you be ok if that were your kid?

Uh, the probable cause is that they are not here legally