Why is there so much hate here directed at Gabbard? I just can't figure it out ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes voting against the Magnitsky Act was another HUGE strike against her. And she hired a campaign manager who

Also read this:

https://twitter.com/Billbrowder/status/1185836541295415297

Browder is a criminal and a liar who ran away from a process server in NYC. That you buy his line makes your gullibility clear.

… And that tells me all I need to know about you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes voting against the Magnitsky Act was another HUGE strike against her. And she hired a campaign manager who

Also read this:

https://twitter.com/Billbrowder/status/1185836541295415297

Browder is a criminal and a liar who ran away from a process server in NYC. That you buy his line makes your gullibility clear.

… And that tells me all I need to know about you.

Look up his transfer pricing case in The Isle of Man.

Party line Democrats at DCUM are a special class of simple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

And even though she says she regrets her past ugly anti-gay stances, I find it hard to trust it's still gone.

She is still in the Science of Identity Foundation, which is a cult. A gay hate cult. Here’s a sample of what he thinks of Muslims and gays.


More here: http://iowainformer.com/politics/2019/09/will-tulsi-gabbard-answer-questions-about-her-lgbtq-hate-guru/

She’s shady AF.

And Biden is still in the Catholic cult that rapes children and promotes pedophilia. And some of the other candidates are in the Christian supremacy cult that believers people that don’t believe in the guy on a cross as a savior are lost souls that will spend eternity in hell that’s supposed to be a ring of fire with a scary red demon torturing them.

Shady AF

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And even though she says she regrets her past ugly anti-gay stances, I find it hard to trust it's still gone.

She is still in the Science of Identity Foundation, which is a cult. A gay hate cult. Here’s a sample of what he thinks of Muslims and gays.


More here: http://iowainformer.com/politics/2019/09/will-tulsi-gabbard-answer-questions-about-her-lgbtq-hate-guru/

She’s shady AF.

And Biden is still in the Catholic cult that rapes children and promotes pedophilia. And some of the other candidates are in the Christian supremacy cult that believers people that don’t believe in the guy on a cross as a savior are lost souls that will spend eternity in hell that’s supposed to be a ring of fire with a scary red demon torturing them.

Shady AF

Wow. Just wow.

You need to go back to "Speak like an American" class, Boris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And even though she says she regrets her past ugly anti-gay stances, I find it hard to trust it's still gone.

She is still in the Science of Identity Foundation, which is a cult. A gay hate cult. Here’s a sample of what he thinks of Muslims and gays.


More here: http://iowainformer.com/politics/2019/09/will-tulsi-gabbard-answer-questions-about-her-lgbtq-hate-guru/

She’s shady AF.

And Biden is still in the Catholic cult that rapes children and promotes pedophilia. And some of the other candidates are in the Christian supremacy cult that believers people that don’t believe in the guy on a cross as a savior are lost souls that will spend eternity in hell that’s supposed to be a ring of fire with a scary red demon torturing them.

Shady AF

Wow. Just wow.

You need to go back to "Speak like an American" class, Boris.

PP, you need to start acting like a thinking human and stop imagining the Russians are everywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

+1

She challenges their rackets, including their war machine and their cynical+obnoxious use of women and minorities as pawns.

"the war machin"

Uh, who started the wars in iraq and afghanistan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

You are saying that all those Bernie supporters in 2016 were....Republicans?

It is a known fact that Hillary controlled the DNC and manipulated the process to benefit herself.

Lies not facts.

Did Hillary force all those people to vote for her over Bernie? How did that happen?

You're so misinformed....you're not Russian by any chance?

"Brazile took over the DNC as interim chair following Debbie Wasserman Schultz's sudden resignation during the Democratic National Convention. Once she was at the party's helm, Brazile wrote that she discovered an agreement that "specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff."

https://www.npr.org/2017/11/03/561976645/clinton-campaign-had-additional-signed-agreement-with-dnc-in-2015

Hillary raised most of the money for the DNC and her campaign.

Note, the agreement the Trump campaign has with the RNC is far more restrictive and less democratic, but I don't see your complaints about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

+1

She challenges their rackets, including their war machine and their cynical+obnoxious use of women and minorities as pawns.

"the war machin"

Uh, who started the wars in iraq and afghanistan?

Sorry, but she and her friends supported both wars, many of her friends profited from them, she made no effort to stop them, didn’t apologize for voting for them, and spearheaded subsequent interventions in Libya and Syria. She also spoke out for additional arms to the Syrian Jihadis. You’re credulity doesn’t get you anywhere with me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like Klobuchar better

Me too. I don’t think Gabbard has a chance but she has become the whipping girl for HRC for an unfathomable reason. She should be as ignored as Stier or Castro.

It's not unfathomable. Having been through a campaign where a "third party" split a close vote, she, like all of us, see Gabbard for what she is and was calling it out. Do some research and it won't be so unfathomable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Democrats do not agree with all of those things. Lots.

I'm a Democrat who does not believe in a lot of those things either. But the rest of the candidates all seem to embrace the same core values. So I don't understand why there's so much hate directed toward her when she basically represents what the rest believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like Klobuchar better

Me too. I don’t think Gabbard has a chance but she has become the whipping girl for HRC for an unfathomable reason. She should be as ignored as Stier or Castro.

It's not unfathomable. Having been through a campaign where a "third party" split a close vote, she, like all of us, see Gabbard for what she is and was calling it out. Do some research and it won't be so unfathomable.

More like Hillary needed to hype the BS idea of ‘Russian interference’ to hide her and her confederates massive failures. Smearing Tulsi was just a tool to stoke Russophobia and get some simpletons to support the war machine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Democrats do not agree with all of those things. Lots.

I'm a Democrat who does not believe in a lot of those things either. But the rest of the candidates all seem to embrace the same core values. So I don't understand why there's so much hate directed toward her when she basically represents what the rest believe.

She did slightly deviate from the 2016 script, actually expecting the Democratic Party to be democratic.

[Anonymous]

It’s her Kremlin talking points that bother me most.

[Anonymous]

According to Ronan Farrow, Hillary is a Harvey Weinstein enabler who tried to block him from running his story. But yeah, she's a "feminist icon" and an overall good person. Nothing to see here.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/amberjamieson/ronan-farrow-catch-kill-book-nbc-weinstein-lauer-clinton

I guess Buzzfeed is owned by the Russians now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And even though she says she regrets her past ugly anti-gay stances, I find it hard to trust it's still gone.

She is still in the Science of Identity Foundation, which is a cult. A gay hate cult. Here’s a sample of what he thinks of Muslims and gays.


More here: http://iowainformer.com/politics/2019/09/will-tulsi-gabbard-answer-questions-about-her-lgbtq-hate-guru/

She’s shady AF.

And Biden is still in the Catholic cult that rapes children and promotes pedophilia. And some of the other candidates are in the Christian supremacy cult that believers people that don’t believe in the guy on a cross as a savior are lost souls that will spend eternity in hell that’s supposed to be a ring of fire with a scary red demon torturing them.

Shady AF

Wow. Just wow.

You need to go back to "Speak like an American" class, Boris.

PP, you need to start acting like a thinking human and stop imagining the Russians are everywhere.

There are 2 things I can't explain to you if you don't already understand. One is why attacking Biden's religion doesn't work. The second is why the Russian thing is a joke. I have some Russian friends and they don't get American jokes either.