Why is there so much hate here directed at Gabbard? I just can't figure it out ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don't you try reading the threads in which we say why we don't like Tulsi

Like this one. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/777355.page

That was obviously hijacked by haters. There was no discussion, just hate.

There are lots of reasons for the hate in that thread though? That may answer OP’s question?

[Anonymous]

When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Democrats do not agree with all of those things. Lots.

I mean real Democrats. Not DINOs who want to go along and get along.

I’m a real Democrat. I do not think college should be free for ALL or abortions shouldn’t have ANY restrictions. Do you even hear yourself? I also understand that while we can improve energy efficiency tremendously it’s not realistic to go cold turkey on fossil fuels and nuclear energy.

You sound crazy OP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

Yeah, when the other side is cheering you on, it usually means something has gone wrong in your campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

+1

She challenges their rackets, including their war machine and their cynical+obnoxious use of women and minorities as pawns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

You are saying that all those Bernie supporters in 2016 were....Republicans?

It is a known fact that Hillary controlled the DNC and manipulated the process to benefit herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

Yeah, when the other side is cheering you on, it usually means something has gone wrong in your campaign.

Or that we’re on the cusp of political re-alignment. Are you Tulsi haters so young you’ve never heard of, say, Reagan Democrats?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

You are saying that all those Bernie supporters in 2016 were....Republicans?

It is a known fact that Hillary controlled the DNC and manipulated the process to benefit herself.

Professional Democrats just care about their jobs. What happens to the country or the world doesn’t matter to them, so all who challenge them automatically become ‘Republicans’!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

You are saying that all those Bernie supporters in 2016 were....Republicans?

It is a known fact that Hillary controlled the DNC and manipulated the process to benefit herself.

Professional Democrats just care about their jobs. What happens to the country or the world doesn’t matter to them, so all who challenge them automatically become ‘Republicans’!

...or Russians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

You are saying that all those Bernie supporters in 2016 were....Republicans?

It is a known fact that Hillary controlled the DNC and manipulated the process to benefit herself.

Lies not facts.

Did Hillary force all those people to vote for her over Bernie? How did that happen?

[Anonymous]

Because Tulsi is weak. And no one who votes a Democratic wants her in office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

You are saying that all those Bernie supporters in 2016 were....Republicans?

It is a known fact that Hillary controlled the DNC and manipulated the process to benefit herself.

Lies not facts.

Did Hillary force all those people to vote for her over Bernie? How did that happen?

You're so misinformed....you're not Russian by any chance?

"Brazile took over the DNC as interim chair following Debbie Wasserman Schultz's sudden resignation during the Democratic National Convention. Once she was at the party's helm, Brazile wrote that she discovered an agreement that "specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff."

https://www.npr.org/2017/11/03/561976645/clinton-campaign-had-additional-signed-agreement-with-dnc-in-2015

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

You are saying that all those Bernie supporters in 2016 were....Republicans?

I said no such tiing.

It is a known fact that Hillary controlled the DNC and manipulated the process to benefit herself.

Yeah, whatever. What do you think every politician does? In primary elections, there is often an establishment candidate who is given a leg up. Sometimes this candidate wins, sometimes not. 2016 was the first time in my memory that anyone had a problem with this. I have my theories as to why, but it doesn't matter. The Democrats have no establishment candidate this time and now Trump is manipulating the RNC.