Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Senator Kennedy is an absolute embarrassment.

Yes, he is. The Republicans are going to be like a dog with a bone (or a Benghazi) with the Biden non-scandal. At least Chuck Todd stood up pretty effectively to Kennedy.


Today was the best interview performance I've ever seen Chuck Todd do. I may have to revise my opinion of him. I thought he was a Trumpster.
Anonymous
Dems should feel flattered to make Trump's twitter video. I guess it means they are important.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think the Dems are being set up. One would think they would see the complaint, read the transcript, and then decide. Either that or they have been briefed on this substance of the complaint.

Oh, I came to write just that. Skeptic in me don't believe that GOP and Trump gave up so easily on transcripts and complaint itself. After all non-compliance and lawsuits protecting Trump's finances
Anonymous
Josh Gottheimer in NJ and Steny Hoyer of MD are in which makes #195 and #196.


The only hard no’s who have come out are Tulsi who’s a Russian stooge; Colin Peterson in MN who has an uber-Trumpy district; Jeff Van Drew who flipped a seat in southern NJ that the Rs had held for decades; and Cuellar in Texas who votes with Trump like half the time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the Dems are being set up. One would think they would see the complaint, read the transcript, and then decide. Either that or they have been briefed on this substance of the complaint.


Some of the Intelligence Committee has been leaked to and it's more than a phone conversation. The phone conversation story is a red herring. Stay tuned.

This encourages the view that Coats is the whistleblower.
Anonymous
Finally!! Yay Dems for growing a pair.

Too bad the GOP are such dirtbags and support the lawless Cheeto.
Anonymous
Smokescreen! Wait did Barr to drop the fisa indictments.

#lockthemup
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the Dems are being set up. One would think they would see the complaint, read the transcript, and then decide. Either that or they have been briefed on this substance of the complaint.

Oh, I came to write just that. Skeptic in me don't believe that GOP and Trump gave up so easily on transcripts and complaint itself. After all non-compliance and lawsuits protecting Trump's finances


Transcripts do not matter. Recordings, whistle blower testimony and Giuliani matter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think the Dems are being set up. One would think they would see the complaint, read the transcript, and then decide. Either that or they have been briefed on this substance of the complaint.


I believe it's the first. The Rs have a ton of FOIAs, emails, etc. regarding the Russia inquiry. Trump has already said he plans to declassify as well. Add in Solomon's reporting, and I think the Dems are desperately trying to avoid being exposed and prosecuted. Something is not right.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Smokescreen! Wait did Barr to drop the fisa indictments.

#lockthemup


Barr is going down too for cover-up...watch my word!
Anonymous
https://twitter.com/HoarseWisperer/status/1176621713691484165

Trump called Nancy Pelosi this morning to see if they could work something out on the whistleblower issue.

The dude knows he’s caught.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can someone do a Cliff’s notes of what is going on? I feel very confused. And I usually totally get this stuff.


Trump stopped the transfer of congressionally appropriated aid money (aid money mostly designed to help Ukraine keep russia at bay).

Then he called the Ukrainian president and allegedly implied that he would not release that aid unless ukraine offered some dirt on Joe Biden. Something to do with business deals Hunter Biden was working. So using tax payer dollars to try to extract oppo research from a foreign entity.

Additional susipiciousness:

- Ukraine just ceded some controversial territory with Russia on a timeline that seems like it might be related

- News broke that someone in US intelligence filed a formal whistleblower complaint that supposedly alleges Trump wrong doing. The call with the Ukrainian president is a part of the complaint but not the entirety of it.

This clear bad and illegal behavior combined with the seriousness of the fact that there is a formal whistle blower complaint has Pelosi finally pulling the trigger on impeachment proceedings.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can someone do a Cliff’s notes of what is going on? I feel very confused. And I usually totally get this stuff.


Trump stopped the transfer of congressionally appropriated aid money (aid money mostly designed to help Ukraine keep russia at bay).

Then he called the Ukrainian president and allegedly implied that he would not release that aid unless ukraine offered some dirt on Joe Biden. Something to do with business deals Hunter Biden was working. So using tax payer dollars to try to extract oppo research from a foreign entity.

Additional susipiciousness:

- Ukraine just ceded some controversial territory with Russia on a timeline that seems like it might be related

- News broke that someone in US intelligence filed a formal whistleblower complaint that supposedly alleges Trump wrong doing. The call with the Ukrainian president is a part of the complaint but not the entirety of it.

This clear bad and illegal behavior combined with the seriousness of the fact that there is a formal whistle blower complaint has Pelosi finally pulling the trigger on impeachment proceedings.


Explain the crime. What crime is committed in what you just typed? The President would have the right to do this. You have the right not to vote for him because he lacks the foreign policy strategy that you want. However, none of this would be a crime.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can someone do a Cliff’s notes of what is going on? I feel very confused. And I usually totally get this stuff.


Trump stopped the transfer of congressionally appropriated aid money (aid money mostly designed to help Ukraine keep russia at bay).

Then he called the Ukrainian president and allegedly implied that he would not release that aid unless ukraine offered some dirt on Joe Biden. Something to do with business deals Hunter Biden was working. So using tax payer dollars to try to extract oppo research from a foreign entity.

Additional susipiciousness:

- Ukraine just ceded some controversial territory with Russia on a timeline that seems like it might be related

- News broke that someone in US intelligence filed a formal whistleblower complaint that supposedly alleges Trump wrong doing. The call with the Ukrainian president is a part of the complaint but not the entirety of it.

This clear bad and illegal behavior combined with the seriousness of the fact that there is a formal whistle blower complaint has Pelosi finally pulling the trigger on impeachment proceedings.


Explain the crime. What crime is committed in what you just typed? The President would have the right to do this. You have the right not to vote for him because he lacks the foreign policy strategy that you want. However, none of this would be a crime.


https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/quote/30/15736775.page

He compromised national security for his political gain - besides extortion and bribery...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can someone do a Cliff’s notes of what is going on? I feel very confused. And I usually totally get this stuff.


Trump stopped the transfer of congressionally appropriated aid money (aid money mostly designed to help Ukraine keep russia at bay).

Then he called the Ukrainian president and allegedly implied that he would not release that aid unless ukraine offered some dirt on Joe Biden. Something to do with business deals Hunter Biden was working. So using tax payer dollars to try to extract oppo research from a foreign entity.

Additional susipiciousness:

- Ukraine just ceded some controversial territory with Russia on a timeline that seems like it might be related

- News broke that someone in US intelligence filed a formal whistleblower complaint that supposedly alleges Trump wrong doing. The call with the Ukrainian president is a part of the complaint but not the entirety of it.

This clear bad and illegal behavior combined with the seriousness of the fact that there is a formal whistle blower complaint has Pelosi finally pulling the trigger on impeachment proceedings.


Explain the crime. What crime is committed in what you just typed? The President would have the right to do this. You have the right not to vote for him because he lacks the foreign policy strategy that you want. However, none of this would be a crime.


He does have the right. And he stopped the money initially for the same reason he's always stated, that other nations aren't providing their fair share.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: