3Bullets through school window

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Council is doing everything possible to undermine and underfund polic. Especially nadeau. Columbia Heights has had shootings in the middle day 9 times in the last 6 weeks. Tubman elem has gone on lock down because of bullets flying outside. Nadeau opens her meeting a with “I know you are all scared of police so I’m just letting you know they will be here but will stand in one place in the room” wtf. Then she says we don’t need police but “violence disrupters”- council got rid of Vice squads over the objection of police. Community meetings do NOTHING to stop violence. Nothing.


And what a joke this is . Sadly, this is pretty much anyone running with a "D" by their name in DC. I wish the same people victimized by their policies could see how little they actually do for the "community"
Need some new voices. I'd happily vote for an independent or a Republican. In DC that is just anyone not loony self serving and myopic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peter Newsham, current police chief.

Policing here in DC is hampered by lack of political will to actually prosecute criminals. Repeat offenders back on the streets after committing crimes.

If you want people on council/mayor who actually care more about law-abiding citizens than criminals, you have to vote for them.

- Not a Democrat


100% agree. Do you have any candidate to suggest? I am hoping there are more than 2 of us. Happy to back anyone with an alternative viewpoint to the current by and large disappointing Council and Mayor.


Wish I could say I did. Still waiting for a unicorn to arrive...
Anonymous
Look I get that it's easy to make fun of all the local politicians but what we have here isn't that much different than any other city. You either have 1) a bunch of corrupt crooks who could care less about the community and just skate through without doing much damage so they can get re-elected or 2) clueless do-gooders who get into the position to actually help and are likely overwhelmed by the corrupt crooks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peter Newsham, current police chief.

Policing here in DC is hampered by lack of political will to actually prosecute criminals. Repeat offenders back on the streets after committing crimes.

If you want people on council/mayor who actually care more about law-abiding citizens than criminals, you have to vote for them.

- Not a Democrat


100% agree. Do you have any candidate to suggest? I am hoping there are more than 2 of us. Happy to back anyone with an alternative viewpoint to the current by and large disappointing Council and Mayor.


Wish I could say I did. Still waiting for a unicorn to arrive...


If you run, I'd contribute. Our politicians take DC residents absolutely for granted. And then go about their business with cronies. Awful.
Anonymous
What I've started to do is vote for anyone with an R next to their name, followed by an Independent (they can be dicey though, so I do more research there). If a D like Tony William's were ever to show up again they would get my full support, but that's been my strategy to date. I think if a R ever won it would send such a message. I fully realize that's the mentality that got Trump elected, but I also think municipal and federal politics are different and the idea that DC can only be and air democratic party voices is obnoxious and dangerous in it's own right. And yes, I would hold an R accountable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What I've started to do is vote for anyone with an R next to their name, followed by an Independent (they can be dicey though, so I do more research there). If a D like Tony William's were ever to show up again they would get my full support, but that's been my strategy to date. I think if a R ever won it would send such a message. I fully realize that's the mentality that got Trump elected, but I also think municipal and federal politics are different and the idea that DC can only be and air democratic party voices is obnoxious and dangerous in it's own right. And yes, I would hold an R accountable.


So it's okay for you to vote for anyone with an R but it's not going for people in DC to always vote for anyone with a D? Got it.
Anonymous
To add to the above: You say you vote for anyone with an R and research independents. So you don't research who you're voting for as long as they have an R? That's obnoxious and dangerous and exactly what you're preaching against with DC always voting D.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:To add to the above: You say you vote for anyone with an R and research independents. So you don't research who you're voting for as long as they have an R? That's obnoxious and dangerous and exactly what you're preaching against with DC always voting D.


I voted for William's multiple times based on "research". I am growing weary of my Councilmember and will research any candidate opposing her. I am not a Bowser fan or many of the at -large, have researched. You and I both know there are very few candidates with an R and of those zero currently have a chance to win. I do check them off to send a message that people in this city seek an alternative. If the races were closer, I would do far more research. I sense a desire for change in our monolithic political scene and may event get more involved at the ANC level, and also in people campaigns. Frankly, I think you have to be very brave to identify as an R at all in this city and it is career and social suicide in some cases. I would guess there are more Rs or centrists than we know masquerading as Ds and Is. That'swhy Tony got my vote. IN no way does he compare to the corrupt Mayor or loony council. He was a decent doer, not without detractors, but who overall ignited the DC renaissance. I will always look for those candidates with a D who are not beholden to corruption and /or San Francisco policies. You can pick apart what I say - I am.simply encouraging people to consider that you dont HAVE to vote for the status quo. And look at the status quo - our policing is failing. Shots through school windows in prosperous DC of 2019? C'mon.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peter Newsham, current police chief.

Policing here in DC is hampered by lack of political will to actually prosecute criminals. Repeat offenders back on the streets after committing crimes.

If you want people on council/mayor who actually care more about law-abiding citizens than criminals, you have to vote for them.

- Not a Democrat


100% agree. Do you have any candidate to suggest? I am hoping there are more than 2 of us. Happy to back anyone with an alternative viewpoint to the current by and large disappointing Council and Mayor.


Wish I could say I did. Still waiting for a unicorn to arrive...


If you run, I'd contribute. Our politicians take DC residents absolutely for granted. And then go about their business with cronies. Awful.

Well thanks! Don't think I will but happy to contribute to anyone who plans to actually do something about crime. Why so many highly educated voters here have such low expectations of our Council/mayor when it comes to protecting the public (kids, no less) is beyond me.


Anonymous
I wouldn't vote for an R - even a DC resident who is an R - if my life depended on it. Hilarious that you think the way to get rid of corruption is to vote for a Republican. Ok then....
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't vote for an R - even a DC resident who is an R - if my life depended on it. Hilarious that you think the way to get rid of corruption is to vote for a Republican. Ok then....


I do. I look at it as giving the Ds some impetus. And most Rs who live in DC would be centrists or Ds anywhere else. The Ds in DC Politics would mostly be FAR Left anywhere else.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't vote for an R - even a DC resident who is an R - if my life depended on it. Hilarious that you think the way to get rid of corruption is to vote for a Republican. Ok then....


I do. I look at it as giving the Ds some impetus. And most Rs who live in DC would be centrists or Ds anywhere else. The Ds in DC Politics would mostly be FAR Left anywhere else.


What? The last R council candidate was a Koch employee.

The Republicans in DC are far more insane than the Republicans in other cities.
In Boston, Chicago, New York, the Republican candidates are just standard-issue Republicans: unaware theyre being screwed by billionaires, worried only about lower taxes for them. In a word: selfish.

Republicans in DC are far worse: brainwashed ideologues who work for Heritage or Cato or Koch or other billionaires. Parachuted into DC to function as apparatchiks. Dangerous for America and DC. And soft-minded at best. Let’s be honest— no one who understands how the world works and is not a billionaire would ever work for a Republican elitist org like Heritage or Cato.

Vote for DC Republicans at your peril. There’s a reason why Democrats preside over the majority of vibrant creative urban economies in America.
Anonymous
Also Republicans take money from billionaires to shill for billionaires. That’s the definition of corruption— taking an action because remuneration depends on it.
Anonymous
Why would you vote for a republican when they're solution for crime is to make sure that more people have guns? They would like to see teachers have guns
Anonymous
Also - this point "The Ds in DC Politics would mostly be FAR Left anywhere else." is a good thing in my eyes. In one of the many ways dcurbanmom is a behavioral anomaly of this city (whiter, crazier) you can't even read the room that MOST people in this town like the Ds and want them to be "left". You actually think any of us want a Republican run anything? That is pathetic. Seriously.

The issue here is corruption, it isn't about ideology. Your beloved Republicans start out as corrupt. We are swimming in examples of their corruption as a nation every day. I'm really sorry you can't figure this out.....
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: