Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can she wear a dressy tunic over nice leggings? Or a dressy skort and nice top?
I sympathize OP as I was that kid too. Hated dresses, cut the lace off my socks, hated the patent leather dressy shoes (80s). My parents required that I wear a dress for synagogue and other dressy events but compromised by letting me have input into picking it -- and not complaining if I picked something plain, like red and black stripes instead of pink with frills and lace.
If you can, find out why she hates dresses so much. For me it was because I felt self-conscious in them. Even at 6 I thought I was fat (I wasn't, but I wasn't as skinny as my super-skinny sister, which in my mind translated to fat). Getting to pick the dress helped because I could choose colors I liked.
I don't think there is anything wrong with saying "look, there is a dress code; when it's a dressy event, girls wear a dress or a skirt and boys wear nice pants and a polo shirt. You have to wear a dress or skirt to be appropriately dressed, just like you don't wear shorts in the winter or a scarf in the summer. But you can help pick the dress or skirt."
Why? Why can't girls wear nice pants and a polo shirt? Or a different kind of shirt? There are SO many options for tops: sweaters, button downs, polos, etc. Let the kid wear what she wants. Insisting on a level of formality appropriate to the occasion is reasonable. Forcing anyone to conform to specific gender norms is not.
Because those are not nice or dressy. If this is truly a formal event. An adult woman would be underdressed if she wore polos and nice pants to a non-casual wedding or religious event. So would a girl. But a boy might not be.
If the kid is gender nonconforming that's one thing. Otherwise, sometimes you have to suck it up. I don't like wearing suits but I do for court because that's the dress code. I don't like wearing dresses but I do for non-casual weddings because that's the dress code. My husband hates wearing a tie because he finds it uncomfortable, but he wears one anyway to synagogue, weddings, important business meetings, etc.
Mi don’t really agree...I’ve just seen so many women at formal events in beautiful pants (brocade, silk, etc) and formal jackets and blouses. Even brides. Only in very conservative circles would anyone even notice that a woman is wearing something other than a dress or skirt.
Huh. Not been my experience at all and we are not at all conservative in political or religious terms.
The only women I see at formal events who are dressed in pants are older women, like 60+. Everyone else is wearing dresses. Now going out to eat at a fancy restaurant, sure, I see lots of younger women in nice pants. But at weddings? Rarely.
In fact I frequently am surprised at how many parents send their kids to day care / preschool /playground in a dress. My daughter looks adorable in dresses but we save them for special occasions. The rest of the time she's in pants or long shorts and a cute top that covers her butt but is not much longer, so that it doesn't get in her way when she climbs or jumps or rolls. But my 5 year old son's classmates wear dresses all the time, which I find surprising. And really fancy dresses too, sometimes.
I am one of the posters who hated dresses as a kid and still wear them as infrequently as possible. But I guess I am somewhat conservative in the sense that I think there are some ways in which clothing is more or less appropriate. I don't like bra straps showing. I don't like underwear showing. I don't think it's appropriate to hang out in the library wearing a swimsuit and a lace see-through coverup. I wouldn't let my son wear a dress to a fancy event or my daughter wear pants to one. In everyday life on the playground, sure, they can wear whatever, so long as they are decently covered and appropriate for the weather and activity level. But when they are actually getting dressed up for a formal occasion, nope. There are some conventions around clothing that I don't have any problem following.
To each her own, obviously.