https://admissions.psu.edu/apply/statistics/ https://oafa.pitt.edu/explore/class-profile/ These are admitted students; common data set looks at enrolled students. I wouldn't consider 40 points "a good deal higher". Also, trying to compare weighted GPA with unweighted doesn't tell you much. |
| Isn't Temple private? |
Ah, gotcha. Interesting comment about warped because in our little world every time ASU is mentioned the words “party school” tend to follow. Undoubtedly unfair. |
Well, enrolled students are what counts. And it's 80 points of total SAT score which does seem a "good deal higher" (though not quite 100 points as I first thought offhand). If you compare this to national percentiles Penn State's 25th percentile mark is at 67% whereas Pitt's is at 80%. That's fairly different to me .And since the GPAs are both drawn from the Common Data Set for PA, they might both be reporting weighted--I don't know--but even so >.5 average difference is meaningful. I don't have a horse in this race--I didn't go to either school nor are any of my kids--just found it interesting and wondered if it was pointing to a trend towards more urban schools. |
Pitt offers significant merit aid to high achieving students. PSU does not. That's the difference. |
Temple is public, Drexel is private |
| Penn |
|
Penn State, Temple, and Pitt are not 100% state schools like other state schools in Pennsylvania (like West Chester, Shippensburg, Millersville, etc.). Temple, Penn State, and Pitt are state-related, so they get some aid from the state but not as much as a true public state school in Pennsylvania. Here's a short explanation:
https://www.pitt.edu/chancellor-search/state-related |