| I guess colleges are happy to hang on to your kid for six years. University of Edinburgh 4 year graduation rate is 95%. Other top tier UK unis have more or less the same rate, good fit or not. |
| This goes for any kid, no matter how liberal or conservative. If you don't have many choices or much money you just go to the closest college or most affordable college and "suck it up." |
Exactly. "Fit" is for people who have the luxury of "choice". Most people don't. Most people are just lucky if they can go to any college much less a "fit". |
It was intended to be a crappy post, because OP is being an ass. But, you misunderstand the OP's post. Her main point is not that many people don't have options - that was a supporting point. Her main point was that kids who *do* have options and try to find a school that is a good "fit" are coddled whiners who needs to suck it up and quit worrying about trivial things like happiness. Because some (many) people don't have options, those that do are ridiculous babies when the exercise them. But, although I did mean to make the OP feel badly, I didn't intend for that to spread to others. If it did, I apologize. OP is still an ass, though. |
|
"Fit" is a euphemism for "I can afford any school and I will tell you we chose X school for Fit to make you feel superior about paying less at your state school and make your kid feel like he is smarter/tougher because I don't want to deal with your hurt ego
Same went for going to private school vs. public school. |
And if you have enough money or opportunity to go to a college with good "fit" why wouldn't you? |
Because it makes OP, who obviously didn’t, bitter. |
+1 |
Okay, that was funny because I’m sure some parents do this. Pretty sure I’ve met some of them. “Jimmy could have gone to Princeton but the fit at Frostburg was too good to pass up.” But seriously, how do YOU pick a college? Best value approach is almost always CC, followed by state flagship. Is it your view that everyone should take that route? |
My son is dyslexic, he want to a very good private school. I lied and told people he went to private because he was dyslexic, he went because I liked the school and he liked high level sports. When he was young people were like "omg we have the best school why would you ever go public" I could have said, "because I can', "because it is better" or I could just say "he's dyslexic"... I chose to make the other person feel like my son couldn't hack it at public to make them feel better. It's a better "fit", he's a snowflake. Same with his small private highly selective college instead of going to MD... "oh he would be eaten alive at MD". You get I would never say this IRL, it sound terrible but it's the truth. I just loved the schools he went to and sure, public was "good too" but I liked the other schools better. BTW, I went to MD, I'm and Engineer, I think MD is da bomb... but I also think there are other options. |
For our family, fit is the school where my child feels comfortable attending. Comfortable includes, academic standards (challenging curriculum, interesting classes, appropriate schools of study), student body culture (liberal, conservative, down-to-earthy, snobby), cost (they ain't going where they can't afford), religious life, sports, etc. So you are somewhat right that fit does include affordability. Does it make us feel superior to say a school was the right fit? I can't say it does. I feel superior because my children are superior-- no matter where they go to school. Some people get caught up in needing the name or type of school to feel superior because they don't feel superior-- maybe that's you PP? I know my kids are superior and don't need the name of a school to affirm that knowledge. Whether he or she goes to Harvard, Maryland, Towson, UVA does not make me feel like my child is smarter, tougher or whatever it is you have written above. Having your child go to a school that is the right fit is the smart choice. For some people, the right fit is Yale and for others it is University of North Dakota. |
| I think it's dumb not to think of "fit" -- fit includes academic, social, geographic, financial and often involves casting a wider net than what initially appears to be the best choice. I think NOT thinking of fit is for "snowflakes" who don't do a serious in-depth analysis of the options and weigh one of your most major purchases as well as life experiences. I think it can be silly to reify some aspect of fit--but a not to think about it at all is just taking the simplest road forward rather than doing analysis. |
I agree, although I think what OP is getting at is that being able to consider fit is a privilege. Most people are lucky to go to college at all and, if they do, have to pick the one they can afford. Being able to consider factors other than finances is a luxury most people don't have. So it's less about being a snowflake and more about privilege. |
| I went to a SLAC that is highly regarded on this board. It wasn't the best fit for me, and the fact that I was out of place turned out to be one of the best educational experiences of my life. |
You had me, until you compared China, Singapore and Russia. This is akin to comparing Apples, pears, and kiwi. |