Italy ending Child Support and redefining divorce laws

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Italian women are largely not having kids anyhow. Who this will impact most is the poorer immigrant population and I suspect this will mostly hurt women and kids who are already vulnerable.

The only ones affected right now are those with Italian marriages because their alimony law went into effect last year. Child support is next year and I think the immigrant population has more pressing concerns to worry about than how to separate from the person they jiurney a 1,000+ Miles over land and water with.

[Anonymous]

“Laws like this erase the work women do to create family wealth.”

+1
- FT WOHM

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe in equal share custody. No such thing.

How so? Court-appointed split of calendar year or intervals of time shared. Seems pretty simple to implement. Also gives both parents a chance to see their children.

I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the kids.

+1

Children belong with their mother. Period.

XH's can be responsible fathers by paying on time. That's all that's needed from them.

. Holy shit! Please tell me you don’t actually believe this. I know plenty of men who are better parents than their wives. The male hatred in our society is out of control.

Men are absolutely f*cking useles. Every one of them. That's what I believe.

[Anonymous]

Italy already has a very tiny birth rate...there will be no Italians in the next 100 years or so. This is the nail in the coffin. Men will peel off "wives" on a PRN basis. This is beyond stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This law will destitute SAHMs and make it financially hard for them to divorce.

On the contrary I think it might give women a kick in the rear. More than half of Italy’s women don’t work outside the home. HALF. And that’s not uncommon throughout the EU.

What is wrong with that? Their husbands want them home nurturing the most important asset of their lives, the children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t some spouse literally just murder her own children from that stress of being forced to move with the ex husband?
Extreme circumstance I know, but still...

No, she murdered her children because she is a crazy evil woman. Not because she was mad over moving. Dumb bitch should have killed herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe in equal share custody. No such thing.

How so? Court-appointed split of calendar year or intervals of time shared. Seems pretty simple to implement. Also gives both parents a chance to see their children.

I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the kids.

+1

Children belong with their mother. Period.

XH's can be responsible fathers by paying on time. That's all that's needed from them.

. Holy shit! Please tell me you don’t actually believe this. I know plenty of men who are better parents than their wives. The male hatred in our society is out of control.

Men are absolutely f*cking useles. Every one of them. That's what I believe.

It is such a shame that your uterus wasn't barren, but now instead your ugly awful gene's have reproduced. All I hope is that your kids are not as repugnant as yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This law will destitute SAHMs and make it financially hard for them to divorce.

On the contrary I think it might give women a kick in the rear. More than half of Italy’s women don’t work outside the home. HALF. And that’s not uncommon throughout the EU.

What is wrong with that? Their husbands want them home nurturing the most important asset of their lives, the children.

Your children are not an asset. And providing for yourself and your children like a functional grown up is not mutually exclusive to nurturing your children. Unless of course you are a absolute ding bat who can't handle the basics of life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This law will destitute SAHMs and make it financially hard for them to divorce.

On the contrary I think it might give women a kick in the rear. More than half of Italy’s women don’t work outside the home. HALF. And that’s not uncommon throughout the EU.

What is wrong with that? Their husbands want them home nurturing the most important asset of their lives, the children.

It infantilizes 51% of the global population - that's whats wrong, which is why you see so many mothers encouraging their daughters in good educations/careers/work environments. Knowing that they hamstrung themselves and they don't want that for their girls.

Not to mention the economic effects of the nation's GDP. The countries with the worst working women ratios have the worst debt inflation.

[Anonymous]

Italy isn't a a shining beacon of a sensible legislation or fiscal responsibility. Their good days are an ancient history, literally.

[Anonymous]

I think this is a great idea. And I'm female. I believe children would benefit if fathers shared more child rearing. You're not a father if you have the kids one weekend a month.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this is a great idea. And I'm female. I believe children would benefit if fathers shared more child rearing. You're not a father if you have the kids one weekend a month.

I think this is the idea, but will not be the practice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think this is a great idea. And I'm female. I believe children would benefit if fathers shared more child rearing. You're not a father if you have the kids one weekend a month.

I think this is the idea, but will not be the practice.

You won’t know until you try it. And it can’t get much worse than it is now in regards to fathers actually taking a equal hand in raising and being present for their children.

[Anonymous]

italy is amazing. great job

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe in equal share custody. No such thing.

How so? Court-appointed split of calendar year or intervals of time shared. Seems pretty simple to implement. Also gives both parents a chance to see their children.

I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the kids.

+1

Children belong with their mother. Period.

XH's can be responsible fathers by paying on time. That's all that's needed from them.

Some mothers are abusive & some children are far better off with their fathers. Period.