s/o what counts as looking "put together"?

[Anonymous]

Jennifer Garner is the best celebrity to describe frump.

Britney is just white trash. There's no hope for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jennifer Garner is the best celebrity to describe frump.

Britney is just white trash. There's no hope for her.

Jennifer Garner is interesting because she is tall, super fit and muscular, beautiful face but she still manages to look frumpy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reese is short and curvy too. I notice she needs to wear more heels than the taller women to make even her casual looks put together as height makes people look proportionate.






Us short women really have to try much harder than our taller counterparts.

I think she's cute and she has a beautiful face. But she'd definitely look better if she lost 10-15 pounds. I think she knows it too because you can see that her weight really fluctuates between projects and awards season. She'll be skinny again by September for the Emmy's just watch.

If you think those jeans pics make her look like she needs to lose weight, you have a serious issue. That said, we know there's one pro-ana poster here, because the vernacular is the same.

[Anonymous]

That Frump Alert post is hilarious!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reese is short and curvy too. I notice she needs to wear more heels than the taller women to make even her casual looks put together as height makes people look proportionate.






Us short women really have to try much harder than our taller counterparts.

I think she's cute and she has a beautiful face. But she'd definitely look better if she lost 10-15 pounds. I think she knows it too because you can see that her weight really fluctuates between projects and awards season. She'll be skinny again by September for the Emmy's just watch.

If you think those jeans pics make her look like she needs to lose weight, you have a serious issue. That said, we know there's one pro-ana poster here, because the vernacular is the same.

Look at her belly in the third pic and her thighs in the fourth pic. I would bet serious money she is not happy with them. I'm sure she pays serious money to a trainer to get her in shape for awards season.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reese is short and curvy too. I notice she needs to wear more heels than the taller women to make even her casual looks put together as height makes people look proportionate.






Us short women really have to try much harder than our taller counterparts.

I think she's cute and she has a beautiful face. But she'd definitely look better if she lost 10-15 pounds. I think she knows it too because you can see that her weight really fluctuates between projects and awards season. She'll be skinny again by September for the Emmy's just watch.

If you think those jeans pics make her look like she needs to lose weight, you have a serious issue. That said, we know there's one pro-ana poster here, because the vernacular is the same.

Look at her belly in the third pic and her thighs in the fourth pic. I would bet serious money she is not happy with them. I'm sure she pays serious money to a trainer to get her in shape for awards season.

You are insane. She has an AMAZING petite figure.

[Anonymous]

NP. Can we please stop with the skinny shaming? Some (many?) people naturally have fast metabolisms.

You can be skinny and not have an eating disorder.

[Anonymous]

I like her red heels in the fourth pic! Cute!

[Anonymous]

you do NOT have to be a stick to look put-together. You need clothes that fit and match, good undergarments, clean hair and nails.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NP. Can we please stop with the skinny shaming? Some (many?) people naturally have fast metabolisms.

You can be skinny and not have an eating disorder.

Give me a break. No one said otherwise. There is one poster on here saying celebs who weigh 100 lbs need to lose weight and anyone bigger than a 0 is disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In my opinion, the bare minimum of a "put together" look is clean, well-groomed, neat looking, and conveys the message that a person takes pride in their appearance. Hair should be styled (yes, ponytails count as styled). If the wearer likes make up, it should be minimal, enough to enhance the wearer's features for daytime. Not the drag queen look with contouring/highlighting that has become so popular. Clothing should be clean, neat, free of wrinkles, in excellent condition and should fit properly. The colors worn should be harmonious together and compliment the skin tone of the wearer. Also, the cut and shape of the clothing should be appropriate for the body type of the wearer.

Proper fit is something that many in my area (Midwestern USA) seem to struggle with. Unfortunately, when people gain weight, their pants get shorter and tend to hug the rolls in the midsection. This is really unattractive.

*Athletic wear is only appropriate for athletic activities or sporting events, and should not be considered casual wear. Sweats, yoga pants, school/team shirts should not be daily attire for adults. Many people seem to believe that jeans/t-shirts/sneakers or sweats/yoga pants are the only comfortable outfit combinations, but this is simply not true. Slacks, skirts, and cute tops are just as comfortable, and look significantly better.

Lessons from Madame Chic by Jennifer L. Scott is a good book that discusses the subject of being "put together" every day.

I also wanted to add, it seems that many people don't own full length mirrors, which is part of the problem. People have no idea what they look like when they walk out the door. Full-length mirrors can be purchased inexpensively from most big box stores and can be hung over a bedroom or closet door. It is important to know what you look like from the front, back and from head to toe. Using a mirror to make sure you are presenting an acceptable image will not make anyone turn into Dorian Gray.

I think people do have full length mirrors, I just think they have them set up where they lean against the wall so everything looks a little stretched out and leaner. It's super flattering, but it isn't a good indication what you actually look like.

[Anonymous]

How do you post pics?

[Anonymous]

I don't care if you're in shape or obese, yoga pants are not "put together."

[Anonymous]

I don't buy that you can't look put together while not thin or even overweight. I think the problem is brands that appeal to heavier people (Lularoe for example!) are terribly unflattering. If you're not thin, you'd probably look better in something more tailored than an oversized sack in a loud pattern.

I am curious what sizes people consider to be "thin," especially if Reese Witherspoon isn't.

[Anonymous]

http://thistimeimeanit.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/skinny-sepia-man..jpg