Jake Tapper is the first journalist to put Trump's feet to the fire

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he has more of an argument that this judge is a member of La Raza Lawyers Group and that he oversaw a scholarship to an undocumented student.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/

Trump was probably never good at logic and so are you.

Yet the PP and Trump have a huge point, given the La Raza connection.

Are you suggesting that a federal judge who oversaw a scholarship committee which funded one (out of seven) student who identified himself as "undocumented" would be biased against Trump because Trump is "building wall"? In that case most judges will be biased against a lot of the cases they have. That is not how judicial system works - please educate yourself. What is more reasonable is that Trump is creating this personal feud (in preparation of a future appeal) and if the judge responds (I hope he is smart enough to not respond) it is possible that he would site this feud during the appeal.

I am suggesting that a federal judge who picks and chooses which laws he wants to uphold is not a good judge.

Explain me how he picks and chooses which laws he wants to uphold?

Seriously ? An undocumented person is here illegally. He not only didn't enforce immigration law, he rewarded the illegal status with a scholarship.

So the judge should have sent the student to jail or would have deported when the student applied for scholarship, like how? Do you know that many undocumented students in this country get scholarship - even from places like Harvard? You seem to be totally confused about the roles or responsibility of a judge and the judges other roles outside his job. Please educate yourself. Your hatred is clouding your judgement.

And it's illegal. The judge knows this. And rewarded the behavior. Trump is right. Biased

Scholarships usually do not have a legal and illegal check. They usually have qualification and need check. Have you ever applied for one? The judge did not reward the behavior. The judge awarded because his skill and possibly need. You might want to read this article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/09/24/i-told-harvard-i-was-an-undocumented-immigrant-they-gave-me-a-full-scholarship/

[Anonymous]

Why are we even debating the scholarship? Trump made it very clear that the judge was not biased because he's "Mexican." All this stuff is just a distraction from the fact that Trump is a racist bully who is trying to get the lawsuit against his fraudulent school dismissed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Seriously ? An undocumented person is here illegally. He not only didn't enforce immigration law, he rewarded the illegal status with a scholarship.

A judge is not a Homeland Security employee. It is not his job to arrest people, it is his job to rule on cases brought before him in court.

[Anonymous]

Trump is stupid and had a very limited vocabulary and an even more limited ability to express himself with any kind of finesse. I agree that it would be refreshing to have less political correctness and more honesty but he's just using that as an excuse for his inability to speak on issues with any kind of substance.
I do believe what he was trying to say if he thinks the judge might be biased. And by saying so he's actually admitting /contradicting himself that he's getting a lot of support from the Hispanic community. He's admitting his own flaw - that he's offended every group (Arab, women , Mexican etc) and if he has to deal with these people there's a chance they may be biased against them.
I wish Tapper could have framed the question in that way.

[Anonymous]

I wonder did Jake Tapper think to himself while interviewing Trump that this petty, ignorant, vapid man could actually become president?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he has more of an argument that this judge is a member of La Raza Lawyers Group and that he oversaw a scholarship to an undocumented student.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/

Trump was probably never good at logic and so are you.

Yet the PP and Trump have a huge point, given the La Raza connection.

No. He doesn't. Band he and his lawyers know there is no valid basis for alleging bias, which is why they haven't moved for recusal. You don't get to choose the judge with ethnicity and political views you like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is stupid and had a very limited vocabulary and an even more limited ability to express himself with any kind of finesse. I agree that it would be refreshing to have less political correctness and more honesty but he's just using that as an excuse for his inability to speak on issues with any kind of substance.
I do believe what he was trying to say if he thinks the judge might be biased. And by saying so he's actually admitting /contradicting himself that he's getting a lot of support from the Hispanic community. He's admitting his own flaw - that he's offended every group (Arab, women , Mexican etc) and if he has to deal with these people there's a chance they may be biased against them.
I wish Tapper could have framed the question in that way.

Don't worry, pp, John Dickerson DID frame the question this way to Trump, and Trump said that, indeed, a Muslim judge would not be able to judge him fairly. He just doubled down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he has more of an argument that this judge is a member of La Raza Lawyers Group and that he oversaw a scholarship to an undocumented student.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/

Trump was probably never good at logic and so are you.

Yet the PP and Trump have a huge point, given the La Raza connection.

Are you suggesting that a federal judge who oversaw a scholarship committee which funded one (out of seven) student who identified himself as "undocumented" would be biased against Trump because Trump is "building wall"? In that case most judges will be biased against a lot of the cases they have. That is not how judicial system works - please educate yourself. What is more reasonable is that Trump is creating this personal feud (in preparation of a future appeal) and if the judge responds (I hope he is smart enough to not respond) it is possible that he would site this feud during the appeal.

I am suggesting that a federal judge who picks and chooses which laws he wants to uphold is not a good judge.

Explain me how he picks and chooses which laws he wants to uphold?

Seriously ? An undocumented person is here illegally. He not only didn't enforce immigration law, he rewarded the illegal status with a scholarship.

So the judge should have sent the student to jail or would have deported when the student applied for scholarship, like how? Do you know that many undocumented students in this country get scholarship - even from places like Harvard? You seem to be totally confused about the roles or responsibility of a judge and the judges other roles outside his job. Please educate yourself. Your hatred is clouding your judgement.

And it's illegal. The judge knows this. And rewarded the behavior. Trump is right. Biased

Scholarships usually do not have a legal and illegal check. They usually have qualification and need check. Have you ever applied for one? The judge did not reward the behavior. The judge awarded because his skill and possibly need. You might want to read this article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/09/24/i-told-harvard-i-was-an-undocumented-immigrant-they-gave-me-a-full-scholarship/

They knew this individual was illegal. So did Harvard. Both broke the law. Doesn't matter how much need was there. Illegal is unqualified

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he has more of an argument that this judge is a member of La Raza Lawyers Group and that he oversaw a scholarship to an undocumented student.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/

Trump was probably never good at logic and so are you.

Yet the PP and Trump have a huge point, given the La Raza connection.

No. He doesn't. Band he and his lawyers know there is no valid basis for alleging bias, which is why they haven't moved for recusal. You don't get to choose the judge with ethnicity and political views you like.

Tell that to these folk:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/05/us/federal-judge-in-texas-is-accused-of-racial-bias.html?_r=0

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he has more of an argument that this judge is a member of La Raza Lawyers Group and that he oversaw a scholarship to an undocumented student.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/

Trump was probably never good at logic and so are you.

Yet the PP and Trump have a huge point, given the La Raza connection.

I think you're confusing the La Raza professional society with the activist group. Red State points out the issue:

http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/06/03/dishonest-attempt-associate-gonzalo-curiel-la-raza/

As a first generation American, it is beyond offensive to me that a Presidential nominee would suggest my parents' country of origin would impact my allegiance to the US, including its laws. If you don't see how this is the exact same type of racism that led to the Japanese internment during WWII, out country is in a very sad state.

I'm listening right now to Stacy Dash talk about how we will never be integrated if there are these types of organizations. She's correct. Did he, or did he oversee the scholarship for an undocumented immigrant? That's a problem.

I stopped at "you are listening to Stacy Dash" one of the dumbest women EVER! Give me a freakin break. You are as slow as she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he has more of an argument that this judge is a member of La Raza Lawyers Group and that he oversaw a scholarship to an undocumented student.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/

Trump was probably never good at logic and so are you.

Yet the PP and Trump have a huge point, given the La Raza connection.

No. He doesn't. Band he and his lawyers know there is no valid basis for alleging bias, which is why they haven't moved for recusal. You don't get to choose the judge with ethnicity and political views you like.

Tell that to these folk:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/05/us/federal-judge-in-texas-is-accused-of-racial-bias.html?_r=0

Ahem.

According to the complaint, Judge Jones, 64, who was nominated to the bench by President Ronald Reagan, and who until recently was the chief judge of the Fifth Circuit and mentioned during Republican administrations as a possible Supreme Court nominee, said that “racial groups like African-Americans and Hispanics are predisposed to crime.”

The complaint says such statements violated the judicial code’s requirement that a judge be impartial and avoid damaging public confidence in the judiciary.

One of the affidavits accompanying the complaint is from Marc Bookman, a veteran death penalty lawyer in Pennsylvania, who attended the lecture. He quoted Judge Jones as saying, “Sadly, some groups seem to commit more heinous crimes than others.” When asked to elaborate, Judge Jones “noted there was no arguing that ‘blacks’ and ‘Hispanics’ far outnumber ‘Anglos’ on death row and repeated that ‘sadly’ people from these racial groups do get involved in more violent crime,” the affidavit said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he has more of an argument that this judge is a member of La Raza Lawyers Group and that he oversaw a scholarship to an undocumented student.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/

Trump was probably never good at logic and so are you.

Yet the PP and Trump have a huge point, given the La Raza connection.

Are you suggesting that a federal judge who oversaw a scholarship committee which funded one (out of seven) student who identified himself as "undocumented" would be biased against Trump because Trump is "building wall"? In that case most judges will be biased against a lot of the cases they have. That is not how judicial system works - please educate yourself. What is more reasonable is that Trump is creating this personal feud (in preparation of a future appeal) and if the judge responds (I hope he is smart enough to not respond) it is possible that he would site this feud during the appeal.

I am suggesting that a federal judge who picks and chooses which laws he wants to uphold is not a good judge.

Explain me how he picks and chooses which laws he wants to uphold?

Seriously ? An undocumented person is here illegally. He not only didn't enforce immigration law, he rewarded the illegal status with a scholarship.

So the judge should have sent the student to jail or would have deported when the student applied for scholarship, like how? Do you know that many undocumented students in this country get scholarship - even from places like Harvard? You seem to be totally confused about the roles or responsibility of a judge and the judges other roles outside his job. Please educate yourself. Your hatred is clouding your judgement.

And it's illegal. The judge knows this. And rewarded the behavior. Trump is right. Biased

Scholarships usually do not have a legal and illegal check. They usually have qualification and need check. Have you ever applied for one? The judge did not reward the behavior. The judge awarded because his skill and possibly need. You might want to read this article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/09/24/i-told-harvard-i-was-an-undocumented-immigrant-they-gave-me-a-full-scholarship/

They knew this individual was illegal. So did Harvard. Both broke the law. Doesn't matter how much need was there. Illegal is unqualified

So let me get this straight brilliant one. The case started in 2010. The judge, through amazing clairvoyance, knew that Trump was going to tell America that we needed to build a wall in 2016, therefore, he has treated him unfairly because he knew Trump was going to build a wall. Oh, my bad. That makes complete sense. OMG, you are the dumbest person ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he has more of an argument that this judge is a member of La Raza Lawyers Group and that he oversaw a scholarship to an undocumented student.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/

Trump was probably never good at logic and so are you.

Yet the PP and Trump have a huge point, given the La Raza connection.

No. He doesn't. Band he and his lawyers know there is no valid basis for alleging bias, which is why they haven't moved for recusal. You don't get to choose the judge with ethnicity and political views you like.

Tell that to these folk:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/05/us/federal-judge-in-texas-is-accused-of-racial-bias.html?_r=0

Are you a simpleton? Yes, there are judges who are biased and derelict in their duties. But Trump can't say that Curiel is biased simply because his parents are from Mexico.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he has more of an argument that this judge is a member of La Raza Lawyers Group and that he oversaw a scholarship to an undocumented student.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/01/judge-presiding-over-trump-university-case-is-member-of-la-raza-lawyers-group/

Trump was probably never good at logic and so are you.

Yet the PP and Trump have a huge point, given the La Raza connection.

No. He doesn't. Band he and his lawyers know there is no valid basis for alleging bias, which is why they haven't moved for recusal. You don't get to choose the judge with ethnicity and political views you like.

Tell that to these folk:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/05/us/federal-judge-in-texas-is-accused-of-racial-bias.html?_r=0

Are you daft? That judge actually made comments revealing her bias. This judge has done no such thing, even trump hasn't accused him of anything other than being of Mexican descent. This is so very stupid. Put up or shut up. If he thinks he's biased, make a motion for recusal. Of course he won't because he knows he will lose and lose on appeal because there is no valid basis at all. You have to be completely ignorant not to get that.

[Anonymous]

Trump has the emotional maturity of a preschooler.

My 4 year old would say "The teacher put me in time out, because she hates me." Not because I deserved it, not because I did something against the rules -- it's because she doesn't like me.

That's what Trump is saying. "The judge is ruling against me, because he hates me."

By Trump's definition, the only way a judge would be unbiased, would be to always rule in his favor.