Governors all across the country are refusing to take Syrian refugees

[Anonymous]

Could that be worse than what is happening now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, so far it's believed they're all actually citizens of the European Union.

So this is how the second generation goes? Someone above posted that they are not assimilating and that they are possibly rebelling against their parents. This is an interesting supposition.

Sorry -- what evidence do you have that they're second generation? I mean, I realize people are just making shit up, but do you have evidence for that?

In terms of making shit up, it's the governors who are doing that. Once refugees have legal status, no governor can keep them out of his or her state. But Bobby Jindal keeps on talking, starring in the movie that's always playing inside his head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's "Irish need not apply!" all over again.

We never learn.

What do you think should be the response to these terrorists?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How very Christian of them.

Religion isn't allowed in governance.

You'll be opening your home to refugees, I am sure.

Tell that to Hobby Lobby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not stay in your home land and fight for it?

just sayin

No weapons or gear.
Outnumbered by highly trained terrorists.
Women and children don't fight and they make up more than 50%+ of the refugees.
Plus, Assad's forces will also massacre and rape them.

Are you that dense?

And with whom do you fight? Assad's side? An insurgent group that may or may not be inked with Al Qaeda or Isis? Or with Isis?

Seriously. People have no idea about the shifting allegiances in the region. Here's a list of everyone fighting - all these groups are fighting each other. Which side are the refugees supposed to fight on?

-ISIS (receiving some aid from Turkey, Saudis, and Israel)
-Al Qaeda (ditto)
-Assad loyalists (many of whom are Christian and supported by Russian military power)
-Hezbollah (backed by Iran)
-Local tribal warlords (often shifting allegiances between Assad, ISIS, and AQ)
-Kurds (some of whom are hardline Marxists, some are American supported)

So where should the Syrian refugees fight? Remember, all those groups listed above are fighting one another.

Well let's start with Russia supervising a force of men who otherwise would be fleeing. Perhaps relocate immigrants to be part of the force. Then let Putin run the place.

Are you stupid or do you just play one on TV? The Saudis would never allow a Russian (and thus Iranian proxy) forward operating base in the heart of the Middle East.
Try again.

[Anonymous]

All bluster. Governors do not have the power to refuse or turn away refugees.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-94/pdf/STATUTE-94-Pg102.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I suspect the people who will carry out the next attack are already here and have been for quite some time. Everytime I get in a cab in DC and notice that the driver has at least three cell phones, I wonder what the hell he's talking about and who he's talking to. They know the roads, traffic patterns, typical police patrols, security, etc. And they are everywhere--driving cabs in all major cities. They could be an army among us.

You are one crazy paranoid SOB. He's most likely talking to fellow cab drivers, friends or family. By the way, many DC cab drivers are Ethiopean.

[Anonymous]

No worry. We have takers

Pennsylvania
Connecticut
Minnesota
Manhattan NY
Virginia
Washington DC
Maryland

More offers coming in !

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, so far it's believed they're all actually citizens of the European Union.

So this is how the second generation goes? Someone above posted that they are not assimilating and that they are possibly rebelling against their parents. This is an interesting supposition.

Sorry -- what evidence do you have that they're second generation? I mean, I realize people are just making shit up, but do you have evidence for that?

In terms of making shit up, it's the governors who are doing that. Once refugees have legal status, no governor can keep them out of his or her state. But Bobby Jindal keeps on talking, starring in the movie that's always playing inside his head.

Invidious discrimination on the basis of alienage and national origin are a bit problematic in terms of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Reconstruction Era laws like Section 1981.

http://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-14/88-alienage-and-nationality.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect the people who will carry out the next attack are already here and have been for quite some time. Everytime I get in a cab in DC and notice that the driver has at least three cell phones, I wonder what the hell he's talking about and who he's talking to. They know the roads, traffic patterns, typical police patrols, security, etc. And they are everywhere--driving cabs in all major cities. They could be an army among us.

You are one crazy paranoid SOB. He's most likely talking to fellow cab drivers, friends or family. By the way, many DC cab drivers are Ethiopean.

Yes, I know. The one from NoVa was ultimately detained when he fled to Somolia.

It's the three cell phones that make me nervous. You know who carries three cell phones? Cheaters, dealers and terrorists.

[Anonymous]

Colorado wants some !

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it legit for a governor to want to know how refugees are being vetted prior to resettlement? Seems legit to me.

Can someone please tell me how you vet someone with zero documents?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect the people who will carry out the next attack are already here and have been for quite some time. Everytime I get in a cab in DC and notice that the driver has at least three cell phones, I wonder what the hell he's talking about and who he's talking to. They know the roads, traffic patterns, typical police patrols, security, etc. And they are everywhere--driving cabs in all major cities. They could be an army among us.

You are one crazy paranoid SOB. He's most likely talking to fellow cab drivers, friends or family. By the way, many DC cab drivers are Ethiopean.

Yes, I know. The one from NoVa was ultimately detained when he fled to Somolia.

It's the three cell phones that make me nervous. You know who carries three cell phones? Cheaters, dealers and terrorists.

And there are millions of the first, and 10s of thousands of the second, for every one of the third.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No worry. We have takers

Pennsylvania
Connecticut
Minnesota
Manhattan NY
Virginia
Washington DC
Maryland

More offers coming in !

DC doesn't have an immigrantion office even so they really can't take anyone regardless of any circumstances. DC simply is unable to take any. Further since ISIS called out DC as a target to attack, I can't see sending them there. As for Maryland, they have a republican governor now so I am surprised he isn't saying no and because geographically they are next to DC. Same for VA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suspect the people who will carry out the next attack are already here and have been for quite some time. Everytime I get in a cab in DC and notice that the driver has at least three cell phones, I wonder what the hell he's talking about and who he's talking to. They know the roads, traffic patterns, typical police patrols, security, etc. And they are everywhere--driving cabs in all major cities. They could be an army among us.

You are one crazy paranoid SOB. He's most likely talking to fellow cab drivers, friends or family. By the way, many DC cab drivers are Ethiopean.

Yes, I know. The one from NoVa was ultimately detained when he fled to Somolia.

It's the three cell phones that make me nervous. You know who carries three cell phones? Cheaters, dealers and terrorists.

My dad has multiple cell phones one personal on our family plan and the other's for work. He is not allowed to use his personal phone for business, I'm guessing it has something to do with his clearance and sensitive data but Idk. I thought most companies provide cell phones to their employees, especially if they are higher up the ladder.