Ex is hiding money and step mother VA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP--can you provide a rational reason why you feel you are entitled to increased CS based on the new wife's income? I guess what I'm asking is why should she be financially obligated for a child she did not have?

He's not paying anything yet. Its establishment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP--can you provide a rational reason why you feel you are entitled to increased CS based on the new wife's income? I guess what I'm asking is why should she be financially obligated for a child she did not have?

I just don't read the OP this way. Her XH is hiding behind his new wife. OP is interested if there are any options at all.

I think her XH sounds like a cheat. Sadly, I don't think there's a lot OP can do, except realize these are all reasons why they are divorced and to thank god every day she's rid of him.

Yes, he is hiding assests in her name. He sells a house with wife 3. Wife #4 buys a house (not jointly) a few months after settlement etc... There are other instances. In addition, he is postering for voluntary impoverishment (He is plannin on losing his job and being unable to find another) this kind of nonsense.

[Anonymous]

OP,

CS is based on income, not assets. I'm not clear on your claim. What's he doing exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP--can you provide a rational reason why you feel you are entitled to increased CS based on the new wife's income? I guess what I'm asking is why should she be financially obligated for a child she did not have?

He's not paying anything yet. Its establishment

Ok, he's not paying anything yet and you want an amount established. Why do you feel you are entitled to CS based on the new wife's income? Why should she be financially obligated for a child that is not hers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP--can you provide a rational reason why you feel you are entitled to increased CS based on the new wife's income? I guess what I'm asking is why should she be financially obligated for a child she did not have?

He's not paying anything yet. Its establishment

Ok, he's not paying anything yet and you want an amount established. Why do you feel you are entitled to CS based on the new wife's income? Why should she be financially obligated for a child that is not hers?

And, why have you waited years to file (or is the child a product of an affair). You are entitled to child support based off of his income, but do not be surprised if they counter with visitation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP--can you provide a rational reason why you feel you are entitled to increased CS based on the new wife's income? I guess what I'm asking is why should she be financially obligated for a child she did not have?

He's not paying anything yet. Its establishment

Ok, he's not paying anything yet and you want an amount established. Why do you feel you are entitled to CS based on the new wife's income? Why should she be financially obligated for a child that is not hers?

No affair. Troll begone

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP--can you provide a rational reason why you feel you are entitled to increased CS based on the new wife's income? I guess what I'm asking is why should she be financially obligated for a child she did not have?

I just don't read the OP this way. Her XH is hiding behind his new wife. OP is interested if there are any options at all.

I think her XH sounds like a cheat. Sadly, I don't think there's a lot OP can do, except realize these are all reasons why they are divorced and to thank god every day she's rid of him.

Yes, he is hiding assests in her name. He sells a house with wife 3. Wife #4 buys a house (not jointly) a few months after settlement etc... There are other instances. In addition, he is postering for voluntary impoverishment (He is plannin on losing his job and being unable to find another) this kind of nonsense.

So, which wife are you or are you an affair. Nothing makes sense. Why would you have a child with a man who probably has several other kids and married 4 times. Sounds like a bad decision on your part. Divorced once, ok, but 3 times and on wife 4, something isn't right. He may have not gotten any money from wife 3 and she took the money from the house or they may have not gotten anything. Wife #4 could have a good job, savings and bought the house with her money and was smart enough to protect herself. When we bought our house, I put the downpayment down, not my husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP--can you provide a rational reason why you feel you are entitled to increased CS based on the new wife's income? I guess what I'm asking is why should she be financially obligated for a child she did not have?

He's not paying anything yet. Its establishment

Ok, he's not paying anything yet and you want an amount established. Why do you feel you are entitled to CS based on the new wife's income? Why should she be financially obligated for a child that is not hers?

No affair. Troll begone

You are not making any sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP,

CS is based on income, not assets. I'm not clear on your claim. What's he doing exactly?

Moving money to claim poor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP,

CS is based on income, not assets. I'm not clear on your claim. What's he doing exactly?

Moving money to claim poor.

How can he move his income to claim poor? Yes, he can quit or get fired or take a lower paying job, but I fail to see how he can move his income.

[Anonymous]

So he married up?

[Anonymous]

14:45 Karma. (Not OP.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So he married up?

Sorry we are out of kibble today troll

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP--can you provide a rational reason why you feel you are entitled to increased CS based on the new wife's income? I guess what I'm asking is why should she be financially obligated for a child she did not have?

I just don't read the OP this way. Her XH is hiding behind his new wife. OP is interested if there are any options at all.

I think her XH sounds like a cheat. Sadly, I don't think there's a lot OP can do, except realize these are all reasons why they are divorced and to thank god every day she's rid of him.

Yes, he is hiding assests in her name. He sells a house with wife 3. Wife #4 buys a house (not jointly) a few months after settlement etc... There are other instances. In addition, he is postering for voluntary impoverishment (He is plannin on losing his job and being unable to find another) this kind of nonsense.

So, which wife are you or are you an affair. Nothing makes sense. Why would you have a child with a man who probably has several other kids and married 4 times. Sounds like a bad decision on your part. Divorced once, ok, but 3 times and on wife 4, something isn't right. He may have not gotten any money from wife 3 and she took the money from the house or they may have not gotten anything. Wife #4 could have a good job, savings and bought the house with her money and was smart enough to protect herself. When we bought our house, I put the downpayment down, not my husband.

No. He's hiding money from wife 3. I can see it and know about some but I've not told her all I know-can't show my hands it he'll owe her a chunk too

[Anonymous]

Are you purposely being dense,OP? His "assets" as previously stated are not considered in cs, only his income and not his new wife's income. Assets would have been an issue at the time of a divorce for settlement purposes.