Man thrown out of Common Core meeting

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Conservatives are apparently baffled by the law. The man can be charged with all kinds of crimes. He has to be tried before he is convicted. If there is no evidence of a crime -- as you suggest -- then it is very unlikely (remember, the guy is white) that he will be convicted. On the other hand, if there is evidence that is not part of the video being circulated, that will come out in trial.

All charges were dropped. Clearly no case, but justify away. I hope he sues the crap out of the MD school system

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Conservatives are apparently baffled by the law. The man can be charged with all kinds of crimes. He has to be tried before he is convicted. If there is no evidence of a crime -- as you suggest -- then it is very unlikely (remember, the guy is white) that he will be convicted. On the other hand, if there is evidence that is not part of the video being circulated, that will come out in trial.

All charges were dropped. Clearly no case, but justify away. I hope he sues the crap out of the MD school system

Oh please, people get arrested in this situation all the time and charges dropped. Cops do this all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Conservatives are apparently baffled by the law. The man can be charged with all kinds of crimes. He has to be tried before he is convicted. If there is no evidence of a crime -- as you suggest -- then it is very unlikely (remember, the guy is white) that he will be convicted. On the other hand, if there is evidence that is not part of the video being circulated, that will come out in trial.

All charges were dropped. Clearly no case, but justify away. I hope he sues the crap out of the MD school system

Careful. You're being inconsistent. Right-wing nut jobs want tort reform, remember?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Conservatives are apparently baffled by the law. The man can be charged with all kinds of crimes. He has to be tried before he is convicted. If there is no evidence of a crime -- as you suggest -- then it is very unlikely (remember, the guy is white) that he will be convicted. On the other hand, if there is evidence that is not part of the video being circulated, that will come out in trial.

All charges were dropped. Clearly no case, but justify away. I hope he sues the crap out of the MD school system

Careful. You're being inconsistent. Right-wing nut jobs want tort reform, remember?

He was abused. Clearly. On video

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Conservatives are apparently baffled by the law. The man can be charged with all kinds of crimes. He has to be tried before he is convicted. If there is no evidence of a crime -- as you suggest -- then it is very unlikely (remember, the guy is white) that he will be convicted. On the other hand, if there is evidence that is not part of the video being circulated, that will come out in trial.

All charges were dropped. Clearly no case, but justify away. I hope he sues the crap out of the MD school system

Careful. You're being inconsistent. Right-wing nut jobs want tort reform, remember?

He was abused. Clearly. On video

If he feels that was the case, he should sue the security company. What does any of this have to do with Common Core?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Well, like others on this thread, I suppose that the police officer recognized that the protester was a sickening, fucking right-wing nut job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Well, like others on this thread, I suppose that the police officer recognized that the protester was a sickening, fucking right-wing nut job.

Do you believe school policies extend to private property?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Well, like others on this thread, I suppose that the police officer recognized that the protester was a sickening, fucking right-wing nut job.

So you advocate for re-education camps?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Conservatives are apparently baffled by the law. The man can be charged with all kinds of crimes. He has to be tried before he is convicted. If there is no evidence of a crime -- as you suggest -- then it is very unlikely (remember, the guy is white) that he will be convicted. On the other hand, if there is evidence that is not part of the video being circulated, that will come out in trial.

All charges were dropped. Clearly no case, but justify away. I hope he sues the crap out of the MD school system

Careful. You're being inconsistent. Right-wing nut jobs want tort reform, remember?

He was abused. Clearly. On video

If he feels that was the case, he should sue the security company. What does any of this have to do with Common Core?

School hired the security guard

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Conservatives are apparently baffled by the law. The man can be charged with all kinds of crimes. He has to be tried before he is convicted. If there is no evidence of a crime -- as you suggest -- then it is very unlikely (remember, the guy is white) that he will be convicted. On the other hand, if there is evidence that is not part of the video being circulated, that will come out in trial.

All charges were dropped. Clearly no case, but justify away. I hope he sues the crap out of the MD school system

Careful. You're being inconsistent. Right-wing nut jobs want tort reform, remember?

He was abused. Clearly. On video

If he feels that was the case, he should sue the security company. What does any of this have to do with Common Core?

School hired the security guard

If he arrests someone, he is acting as a LEO. Schools can't arrest people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Conservatives are apparently baffled by the law. The man can be charged with all kinds of crimes. He has to be tried before he is convicted. If there is no evidence of a crime -- as you suggest -- then it is very unlikely (remember, the guy is white) that he will be convicted. On the other hand, if there is evidence that is not part of the video being circulated, that will come out in trial.

All charges were dropped. Clearly no case, but justify away. I hope he sues the crap out of the MD school system

Careful. You're being inconsistent. Right-wing nut jobs want tort reform, remember?

He was abused. Clearly. On video

If he feels that was the case, he should sue the security company. What does any of this have to do with Common Core?

School hired the security guard

If he arrests someone, he is acting as a LEO. Schools can't arrest people.

Who paid him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and the man spoke during the Q and A session after the hour long talk, according to those that were there.

Usually, when someone refuses to follow the meeting format, they get asked to leave. If they refuse to leave, security makes them leave. If they refuse to listen to security, they get escorted out.

Why is this so baffling to conservatives, you do it to liberals in your town hall meetings all the time. They expect it, so should you.

What's baffling is how many liberals accept an hour of lecture, followed by hand-picked questions, without questioning why this is being done in this format

They can throw him out, but to arrest him for assault when it was clearly security doing the manhandling smacks of Gestapo.

Conservatives are apparently baffled by the law. The man can be charged with all kinds of crimes. He has to be tried before he is convicted. If there is no evidence of a crime -- as you suggest -- then it is very unlikely (remember, the guy is white) that he will be convicted. On the other hand, if there is evidence that is not part of the video being circulated, that will come out in trial.

All charges were dropped. Clearly no case, but justify away. I hope he sues the crap out of the MD school system

Careful. You're being inconsistent. Right-wing nut jobs want tort reform, remember?

He was abused. Clearly. On video

If he feels that was the case, he should sue the security company. What does any of this have to do with Common Core?

School hired the security guard

If he arrests someone, he is acting as a LEO. Schools can't arrest people.

Who paid him?

Who cares? How does that relate to Common Core?

[Anonymous]

The meeting was about common core

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The meeting was about common core

Right. But the actions of the security guard were not in any way related to Common Core. It's like saying "The vending machine at the Common Core meeting ate my dollar! Therefore, Common Core sucks!"

[Anonymous]

Wonderful site here. As usual the liberal view is to attack the person without having to defend a position. Good thing you are all unhappy and emotional because you all deserve it.