|
I agree that some people seem to throw around the word "FARMS" as code for race. This mostly reflects continued de facto school segregation.
For those of us not from DC, our childhood school experience with the word "FARMS" may mean something completely different from those who are from DC. I grew up in a school where about 40% of school was FARMS and all white. When I see someone use the word FARMS, I know it means low income, and since I know DC, I know it also means AA or Hispanic usually in DC. Once again, because of school segregation and poverty. I don't think that makes me racist to associate the two words. |
| No it does not make you a racist, when you share that story. It makes you a racist, when you say that you don't any FARMS or they have too many FARMs at that school. Better yet, when it is stated the school would thrive if they get rid of the FARMS. See how the racist tone is coming across. |
No. Actually this isn't evidence of racism at all. I don't have any problem sending my kid to a school with 90% members of a different race. I have a big problem with sending my kid to a school with 90% FARMS students. Because there's plenty of evidence that in most cases, when you have a school with a very high poverty load, that school does not work. Particularly in an urban environment. To ignore that is just to ignore reality. And to yell "racism" at someone who points out this plain fact is disingenuous at best. |
| +1 to 13:00 |
Agreed, and I am an AA who would not send my kids to a school which is 90% FARMS for the reasons mentioned above as well as the fact that there are often behavioral issues in these schools which I don't want my children exposed to. |
| @13:00 (NP here) I think there is some racism there when FARMS is used as a euphemism for Black or Latino. So when someone says there's too many FARMS at the school. What they're really saying is that there's too many Black and Latino kids at a school for their liking. When FARMS is meant to mean one's SES only, then there's no racism, but because it can be used as a shorthand substitute for Black/Latino, it can be. It depends on the person using the term and how they view it. |
| Our school is a Title 1 school so every child, white, black, rich, middle and poor gets a FARM if they want one. |
+1 |
Please tell me this is not true. I don;t care what color you are, if you're making a six figure income, there is no way you should be getting free and reduced meals. That's absurd. |
Fantastic. In the District of Columbia (and this is a thread on DCUM, in the DC Public Schools topic section), the vast majority of the time FARM kids are minorities. This is not a controversial statement - it's an objective fact. I'm always fascinated by people who post the equivalent of, "Oh, yeah? Well, in a completely different situation, you'd get a completely different result." No shit. If my aunt had a penis, she'd be my uncle. |
I don't think you know what "code" means. |
| 14:55, you are precious. Don't change. Here we go with skewed statiatics to make meaningless point. What are the FARM stats for Banneker but yet whites feel that Banneker is not worthy, regardless of their track record. What is SWW FARM stats? What is McKinley's FARM stats but their Principal is the Principal of the year at a school with large AA. Is it an oxymoron? |
| "FARMS" is apparently only "code" to a few thin-skinned people from DC. The rest of us don't give a damn about your "code". |
|
18:15, the person you referenced is without a clue on this topic. A family of 4 has to have an income of right around 42K or lower to qualify for a Free or Reduced Price Meal in the DC public schools.
I think the poster is the cousin of word salad lady from Eastern... |
It has nothing to do with FARMS. Banneker and Walls are excellent "for DC". But in the grand scheme of things? They are no better than regular, comprehensive, "good" high schools out in the suburbs around here. McKinley isn't even in the same caliber as the others so I wish people would stop throwing that into the mix. |