Rand Paul Supporters Assault MoveOn.com Member

[Anonymous]

Well democrats vote against outspoken Christians all the time. Whats the big deal.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Well democrats vote against outspoken Christians all the time. Whats the big deal.

We vote for outspoken Christians all the time as well. Can you name one prominent Democrat who has advocated voting against someone merely on the basis of his being a Christian?

BTW, do you notice the irony of a self-described libertarian such as yourself advocating religious discrimination?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well democrats vote against outspoken Christians all the time. Whats the big deal.

We vote for outspoken Christians all the time as well. Can you name one prominent Democrat who has advocated voting against someone merely on the basis of his being a Christian?

BTW, do you notice the irony of a self-described libertarian such as yourself advocating religious discrimination?

There was this guy, Christian, ran for president, African-American fellow - Obama? Yes, that's him. Lots of democrats voted for him.

[Anonymous]

besides the democrats already have the radical muslim and regular muslim vote wrapped up. (as well as the welfare vote). Democrats also have a massive lead in prison population political affiliation. They lead in the homosexual vote. They lead in the flag burners vote and anti-capitalist g-8 violent protest vote. They lead in the people who bite off other peoples fingers vote. They lead in the pull babies out of their mothers and stick a pin in their scull abortion vote. They lead in the stick a cigar in the interns cooch, label the youth a "stalker" until the sperm stain on the dress is discovered vote. The only vote they don't lead in is the conservative christian vote. As Jesus said. "You are either for me or against me" there is no in-between.

[Anonymous]

They lead in the flag burners vote...

I've found that people who obsess over "flag-burners" track almost 1-to-1 with fucking imbiciles. It's entirely a mechanism to gull angry, stupid people into voting for demogogues.

Anyway, thanks for providing today's entertainment. You truly are a douchebag of liberty. Look out for that flag-burner!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who do you think would be more useful for Hitler and national german socialist workers party? The SEIU or the unruly tea party.

I'm going to have to say that the demographics of the SEIU would make it really, really hard for them to support an ideology of a "master race". You can answer for the tea party.

That is *totally* unfair. I watched a youtube video in which a non-white teabagger was interviewed. There were at lest five non-aryans at Glenn Beck's White Pride rally a couple of months ago as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:since when was Hitler against centralized control? Nice try . Just remember national SOCIALIST WORKERS party. And it means what it says. Centralized control is the beginning of the end because people can't be trusted with that much power since we are all corruptable. The framers of the constitution were geniuses. Obama and leftists believe in the regressive centralized corruptable and dangerous model. We progressives believe in the supremacy of the individual, the breakup of political power as well as the wealth engine of free market capitalism. Not to mention the right to bear arms in case you need to shoot any communists or Nazi regressive trying to screw with the freedom our country struggled for.

1. Yes, those framers were geniuses - they got everything right. Especially counting blacks as 3/5 of a person and denying women the vote - boy, they were infallible. And the slaves! Don't forget the slaves.

2. Wait, the Tea Party is now marketing itself as PROGRESSIVE?!?!?!?! Urk.

3. Your perception of history is . . . interesting, to say the least.

You can sum it up pretty well: people like me, good; people unlike me, bad.

Nazis are "liberals" because they're both bad. Racists are bad now, too. That's why blacks are racist, not whites.

Explains the demographic make-up of every teabagger rally, too. White People! Wake Up! The forces of Evil are arrayed against us!!

Would be funny if it weren't so tragic.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:As Jesus said. "You are either for me or against me" there is no in-between.

He also said, ""He that is not against us is for us." So, you figure out the contradiction.

By the way, homosexuality, flag burning, abortion, extra-marital sex, and conservative Christianity are all social issues. I thought you said that you and the rest of the Tea Partiers were strictly libertarian and not interested in social issues. It appears that once the hood comes off, it reveals that underneath is nothing but, well, a hood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:besides the democrats already have the radical muslim and regular muslim vote wrapped up. (as well as the welfare vote). Democrats also have a massive lead in prison population political affiliation. They lead in the homosexual vote. They lead in the flag burners vote and anti-capitalist g-8 violent protest vote. They lead in the people who bite off other peoples fingers vote. They lead in the pull babies out of their mothers and stick a pin in their scull abortion vote. They lead in the stick a cigar in the interns cooch, label the youth a "stalker" until the sperm stain on the dress is discovered vote. The only vote they don't lead in is the conservative christian vote. As Jesus said. "You are either for me or against me" there is no in-between.

When you find the passage where Jesus condemned abortion or homosexuality, please write back with the chapter and verse. I do recall that he said to love your enemies. You don't seem to be doing that right now.

And stop with the fixation about cigars in vaginas. You seem obsessed about it, and it reflects poorly upon you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well democrats vote against outspoken Christians all the time. Whats the big deal.

That's ridiculous. Almost all democrats are Christian. If "outspoken" is code for "anti-abortion, anti-gay", they are voting against issues, not religion.

Even if it were true, it would not be right for either side.

[Anonymous]

I meant dems in office

[jsteele]

Violence by right-wing males against left-wing women continues. In Washington state, a supporter of Republican Senate Candidate Dino Rossi walked over to a 23-year-old female who was protesting against Rossi and hit her. The 72-year-old assailant was arrested.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/washington-man-arrested-for-assaulting-anti-rossi-protester.php

Why are these old white guys beating up on young women? Is that one of those "progressive" values the tea baggers above keep talking about?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:Violence by right-wing males against left-wing women continues. In Washington state, a supporter of Republican Senate Candidate Dino Rossi walked over to a 23-year-old female who was protesting against Rossi and hit her. The 72-year-old assailant was arrested.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/washington-man-arrested-for-assaulting-anti-rossi-protester.php

Why are these old white guys beating up on young women? Is that one of those "progressive" values the tea baggers above keep talking about?

Damned uppity womenfolk! Got to keep 'em in line somehow.

Seriously though, looking at the demographics (ancient white folks) of the teabaggers you realize they'll be dead soon anyway, so it's kind of irrelevant in the near future.

Last gasp of the Jim Crow generation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:...
Seriously though, looking at the demographics (ancient white folks) of the teabaggers you realize they'll be dead soon anyway, so it's kind of irrelevant in the near future.

Last gasp of the Jim Crow generation.

Hey, watch it there, you young whippersnapper. A lot of us old white guys are the hippie, make love not war, generation. Lennon lives! 8)

[Anonymous]

12:36 - you are an ignorant fool.