Rand Paul Supporters Assault MoveOn.com Member

[Anonymous]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pue6oSxeZqw&feature=related liberals are worse

[Anonymous]

So, if this constitutes "Tea Party style" does the SEUI thugs beating the black tea party activist constitute liberal style?

[Anonymous]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXbeq6Rt6Z0 priceless

[Anonymous]

There is a reason sane people despise both you guys. You self proclaimed liberals and conservatives are all fucking idiots. How can anyone justify beating another human being because they want to exercise there American right to advocate for his/her position. Idiots, all of you. You are no better than the shites and shias beating each other up for a political victory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, if this constitutes "Tea Party style" does the SEUI thugs beating the black tea party activist constitute liberal style?

I'm not a member of the SEUI. Are you a member of the Tea Party?

[jsteele]

Hilarious! Tim Profitt, the guy in the video who is stomping his foot on a defenseless woman's head and shoulder, wants the woman to apologize to him:

"I would like for her to apologize to me to be honest with you."

He also claims he stomped on her because a bad back prevented him from bending over.

http://www.wkyt.com/home/headlines/Paul_supporters_who_clashed_with_liberal_activist_speak_out_105833648.html

So, don't anyone out there go and slam your head into someone's foot unless you are prepared to say you are sorry.

[Anonymous]

Kind of think it serves her right. SHe went there for one purpose and that was to provoke an attack to prove that these Tea Party activists were violent. She provoked them and that is the result. Move on.

[Anonymous]

really? You think that if someone attends the Stewart/Colbert rally on Saturday with signs decrying the politics of the participants that an appropriate response would be for the crowd to stomp on that person's head?

What did she do that made it OK for two guys to hold her down, while a third stomped on her head? Can't we just yell at each other?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kind of think it serves her right. SHe went there for one purpose and that was to provoke an attack to prove that these Tea Party activists were violent. She provoked them and that is the result. Move on.

Kind of think you are wrong. If everyone who protests is asking for it, we might as well be in China.

[Anonymous]

I'd still like a detailed description of what this woman was supposed to have done that made her a threat to Paul.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is a reason sane people despise both you guys. You self proclaimed liberals and conservatives are all fucking idiots.

I'm going to assume you're a fucking idiot until you can show an equivalent tendency towards violence among "liberals". Best of luck with that. I know some anonymous contest entrant once called Bush a Nazi. Perhaps start there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, if this constitutes "Tea Party style" does the SEUI thugs beating the black tea party activist constitute liberal style?

I'll assume you're talking about this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFeUhSlHiUQ


This quote from the comments says it all:

don't see where an SEIU member hit anybody what a laugh this video is

I do see black-on-black violence, though, and some fat teabagger falling on? his fat ass. lmao

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXbeq6Rt6Z0 priceless

Actually, your ignorance is pretty priceless.

WTO protestors and the pro-Anarchy types have as much to do with "liberals" as violent neo-Nazi and white supremecist groups have to do with American "conservatives."

Well, actually, that's not quite true: American neo-Nazis vote for (and often run as) Republicans. An American "leftist" of the anarchist or ANSWER variety wouldn't be caught dead voting for a Democrat. They hate Democrats as much as they hate Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Actually the Nazi's were the National German Socialist Workers Party...a left wing group that believed in socialism..centralized control...hated anything resembling the Constitution always pushed for the state over the individual...hated things like Fox News and Gun rights...hated religion. Sound like anyone we know?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Actually the Nazi's were the National German Socialist Workers Party...a left wing group that believed in socialism..centralized control...hated anything resembling the Constitution always pushed for the state over the individual...hated things like Fox News and Gun rights...hated religion. Sound like anyone we know?

Nice try at revisionist history. The way the term "socialism" was used by Nazis was actually closer to what we know as "fascism" than what we know as "socialism". The Nazis hated communists, considering communism a Jewish plot, and invaded the Soviet Union.

Hitler admired and had many admirers among American capitalists. He actually praised Henry Ford in Mein Kampf and George W. Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush, had his company's assets seized under the Trading with the Enemy Act for his dealings with Nazi Germany.

I'm not sure why you think the Nazis hated guns. They required registering handguns and Jews couldn't own weapons. The Nazis actually weakened gun control laws.