MAGAs would NEVER give the benefit of doubt to a black woman who graduated from Ohio State summa cum laude. They would just smirk and say "DEI hire." |
Sure, bubba. But getting it in 1971 means you should be retired by now |
LOL he grew up in a suburb between Cincinnati and Dayton. It's literally the most anodyne location in the country. Republicans act like he grew up in a holler. |
Every. Single. Time. |
|
Any designation that gives you a preference when someone is picking/hiring/awarding is DEI, IMO.
The WSOB I work for can only compete & win bids that have been specifically set aside to be awarded to WSOBs. We participate in the other bids, but we can never win them when competing with "the big dogs" so to speak. And I know they are not all the same thing - DEI, DEIA, EEO, AA - but IMO, they are all the same thing. |
I just read an article on a female pilot who grinded for 12 years to achieve her status only to be looked at as a DEI hire by most people. She's even had passengers refuse to fly with her when they board and find out she's the Captain and question her abilities to her face and in front of other passengers. |
And this is yet another reason why the rhetoric of the current administration is so detrimental to anyone that isn't a white male. Women and minorities already have to work twice as hard to prove themselves only to now be called "DEI hires" |
Well, it gives them a hiring advantage (similar to affirmative action) but that is not because they belong to a protected (EEO) class. It is due to custom advantages they are given (through regulation) in the hiring process. |
It is being given a preference based on service. As far as it applies to a job application, I don't think it outweighs being qualified for the job. Historically, with the federal government it gave you extra "points" on a job application. I think being a disabled veteran might have given more. 5 points for a regular vet. 10 points for a disabled vet or Purple Heart. I'd hardly call it getting a job on a silver platter. I think with the colleges it likely depends on the individual school if they give preference. Not sure all colleges do this. |
|
Yes, it most definitely DEI. We know it includes more men at the exclusion of more highly qualified.
It's not a qualification based on skills or even future capabilities. It's based on past performance of someone, majority young able bodied male, who was interested in war fighting, weapons, and combat or supporting those interested in war fighting, weapons, and combat. Hopefully the military teaches them the difference between guns and weapons. Some were given leadership opportunities at a young age. The problem is that they really don't have the skills to manage people who can just leave if they want. They don't understand that civilians are not military and don't follow orders. When he was 18 he could lift heavy stuff and march in combat gear. Does that entitle him to special privileges for the rest of his life beyond the job benefits he agreed to at the exclusion of more qualified civilians especially women? |
5 points generally would not get you the job if you do not have other qualifications. It shows that you gave up (usually) at least two years of your life to your government. And, it gives you more skills than you realize. I don't know how the civil service rating system works. I'm guessing you get points for a degree, experience, etc. |
So it's affirmative action. Giving value to certain "non-merit" characteristics. |
|
No it definitely guarantees a vet will be in the job. Many governments jobs it has become the default qualification to be considered. So much so that non vets do not apply. |
| DEI refers to the characteristics that are not earned or competency based. |