+100 susbsidized housing has an income limit of $250,000 (that’s a crazy sentence to type)! The median income is in the $300,000 range. $60k is a poverty wage in Palo Alto. |
Honestly for CS go to an ivy other than dartmouth or brown, or go to CMU caltech or MIT. The class sizes are not too huge, comparable to LAC, and the CS bubble is bursting as far as hiring, for all but the tippy top schools. If it must be a LACthen harvey mudd or swarthmore for CS. Mine is CS at penn and have high school friends engineering/CS Swarthmore columbia and cmu. All great programs with top outcomes even in 2024 downturn |
So only go to schools with 2% acceptance rates for cs majors. Noted. |
+1 |
lol. Go to CMU. Easy admit. 😂😂😂 |
|
15 of the top 20 feeders into CS PhD programs by matriculation rate are LACs. Considering how CS is the most selective PhD program right now, that should tell you something. Only the very top CS students have a chance. Most CS PhDs go into high level industry jobs. Far easier to use AI or outsourcing for tasks that don’t require the research skills developed during a PhD program.
I have hired hundreds of software developers. The anti LAC bias of some on this site shout be ignored. https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-phd-programs |
| *should |
+1 Would add about 5-6 schools to this list, but basically if you do not do a CS Bachelors at one of 20ish schools these days, plan to get a masters or phD if your goal is a job not replaceable by AI. The target school list for hiring straight from a BS shrunk dramatically the past 2 cycles. It is clear it is already a little worse for current seniors, marking what appears to be the biggest CSbubble to burst since early 00s. Go for any Engineering, or math or physics instead, or as a double major. |
+1 |
Palo Alto parent checking in. It's hard to make ends meet with even a salary of $200K in Palo Alto. Housing (and food) costs are insane. |
Shut up. |
| University of Tulsa. Serious merit scholarships. |
|
One way to get a sense of which of these undergraduate focused institutions have the most developed CS curriculums is to count the number of professors in their CS depts. I have made an attempt to do so below for LACs mentioned on this thread and a couple others I thought might be of interest. I did not include emeritus profs (usually retired) or lecturers (usually either not full time or lack PhDs.) I did include visiting profs. Of course this is a quick and dirty take; faculty count is an interesting data point but is not the full picture. Of course universities will have far larger counts, but then you have to take into account the usual stuff (the undergrads are a third priority after research and grad students, and what time is spent on undergrads is spread over far larger populations.)
1. Harvey Mudd- 18 2. Swarthmore- 16 3. Carleton- 15 4. Williams- 14 4. Middlebury- 14 6. Oberlin- 12 7. Smith- 11 8. Davidson- 9 * 8. Bowdoin- 9 8. Amherst- 9 8. Lafayette- 9 8. Union- 9 13. Grinnell- 8 13. Pomona- 8 13. Denison- 8 16. Hamilton- 6 16. Reed- 6 16. Wesleyan- 6 19. St Olaf- 5 20. Kenyon- 3** * Davidson doesn’t have a separate CS department but they do have a CS major. The dept is still combined with math, a practice that was common in past decades. I made an attempt to determine how many of the combined faculty are primarily focused on CS based on research interests. ** Kenyon doesn’t have a CS dept or major but a CS “concentration” which is more like an interdepartmental minor. I made an attempt to determine how many faculty are primarily focused on CS based on research interests. |
DD wants CS and a LAC so Grinnell is on the list. Can you elaborate on the issues? |
It looks like PP DID elaborate. |