Clearly all Trump supporters and other republicans are avoiding this thread, so they aren't here to answer your question. My take is those two are exactly what maga want. IME, aside from the nazis, the other maga are people who feel they and their kids can't compete today. The Democrats should take heed and try to take some of the edge off what we used to call 'globalism' in the 80s. |
DP, i'd extend it to late 90s with the expansion of IT until the end of the dotcom era. When you're the country with a manufacturing base that wasn't destroyed by war you have a huge advantage.
Yep, things got better, you had the great migration, brown vs board of ed, and lots of manufacturing jobs were provided! US dominance post war of manufacturing plus a strong military meant lots of job job jobs! Strong unions too.
Women and men will never be equal. Viva la difference! They have complementary traits. Plus not having to slave away to some boss in an office has benefits.
Almost no one paid those taxes on a personal level. On the other hand corporate tax policy did mean that companies gave more benefits to employees and there was more investment in technology. Look at Bell Labs, Xerox Parc, or IBM Research Labs which were in part a result of tax policy.
PE ratio expansion isn't exactly a great thing. On the otherhand if you were a dividend investor, you were fine.
Not at all! Today we have lousy work life ballance, an economy based off intangibles that can easily be disrupted, a (legally) drugged up population, tons of neighbors who are isolated from one another with no sense of community, and if you are a service worker, lousy job prospects with poor benefits. but we have iphones and LGBT acceptance so i guess its a fair tradeoff. |
|
I'm always suprized some liberals think insulting another person's rose-colored dream is a winning tact. effectively you are pointing out that life is horrible now and always was horrible. why do you think this vision will move anybody in a useful direction? why not acknowledge that there were some good things for some people in the past? wouldn't that be more balanced, more honest,
m |
Because the Democrats are actually trying to make things better, but they're not miracle workers. Maga seem to want a miracle. That needs to be pointed out when their delusion is leading us to someone like Trump. If Romney were the GOP candidate, this thread wouldn't exist. |
why do you need to point this out? why not just empathize with them and point out you want these things too. Bernie attracted many Maga by doing this. he never insulted the dreams of others |
Non-maga republicans need the wake up call |
Remember when the right thought that Romney was going to "fight" for them? and by fight we mean, tax cuts for the rich, more wars, strip the industrial base even further and no challenges to our broken immigration system. MAGA is basically 70s/80s democratic policy. |
|
This question has been asked numerous times.
K - 12 schools provided a solid education. High school graduation was something to be proud of. College wasn't life or death. You could marry, buy a house, start a family, achieve a nice comfortable life on very little money. Most Americans enjoyed a high standard of living. There wasn't a huge wealth gap. CEOs didn't expect to make 400 x the amount of their average workers. Corporations invested in their local communities. There was also a lot of white flight by Baby Boomers who fled the urban centers to create suburbs. The tax base went with them. The wealthy whites in urban centers sent their kids to private schools. It's fascinating to look at the yearbooks of urban public schools. Some people are stupid and blame civil rights and feminism for the downfall of the American Dream. |
Things under the Democrats are not getting better. |
Yes, well, this is another “fun” plus for MAGA’s—a rampant disease killing gay men. |
They are in my USA of facts. Crime is down. Markets are up. Unemployment is down AND the participation rate is up. Yes inflation is high, but we had high inflation without the good stuff in the 80s. Yes we have two wars, but our soldiers aren't there, and we lost many marines on foreign deployment in the 80s. |
I think you should try living in the here and now and acknowledge the good things now. The past isn’t coming back. |
|
There are some really interesting responses here. Especially the turning point of 9/11 that many are pointing to. And as a person who will not vote for Trump, I agree that we started to go down a bad path then.
With the introduction of tsa and the patriot act and the general suspicion that has sprung up, it’s been awful. In general the United States overreacted to 9/11 with Iraq and Afghanistan and spying on Americans and the overgrowth of a security government. The post 9/11 security government has been expensive for taxpayers and intrusive. In combination with citizens united we have acquired a very dc centric society that is really pushing legislation that benefits the few insiders. I would agree that reversing that and removing the zeitgeist of suspicion and fear and greed would be good for America. I just disagree that Trump is the answer. |
Trump has said he wants to return to a time that America was great. So what is that time? What are the policies to get there and what are the ramifications for all Americans? |
Spoken like someone who has never lived someone else's experience. |