Cori Bush defeated in Primary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cori Bush lost because she is bad at her job. She's now ranting against AIPAC and how she is "radicalized" and is going to go after "their kingdom". That shows you where her focus is, and it's not Missouri. The people of her district just decided it was time to pick someone who puts them first.

So AIPAC buying a candidate to unseat her was because......

What specifically about aipac explains Cori bush getting fewer votes than her opponent?

You should ask AIPAC why they invested so much money in her opponent. Yes, it was an investment. The minute he steps out of line, they will buy another candidate to oppose him.

Why would AIPAC back a hateful antisemite? Of course they are going to back whoever is not like that. It's just common sense. And then people vote however they want to.

Please provide proof of her antisemitism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I applaud the Democratic Party for moving away from the extreme. The Squad are extremists.

I just wish that the Republican Party would do the same with the Freedom Caucus, but it seems that the Republicans are embracing the extreme rather than denouncing it. It's the extremes that are tearing the country apart. Hopefully after Trump loses again, the Republican party will start to free themselves of his mesmerizing effect and start to ignore that wing. At least Arizona Republicans seem to be recovering. There is a coalition of non-MAGA Republicans that are working the current election to try and prevent these extremists from winning office. And it looks like Georgia may be waking up too. We need more of this, if we want to stop the gridlock. These extremists who refuse to work across the aisle are destroying our federal government.

Agree. I am hopeful that Trump will lose and the extremists on both parties will be minimized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cori Bush lost because she is bad at her job. She's now ranting against AIPAC and how she is "radicalized" and is going to go after "their kingdom". That shows you where her focus is, and it's not Missouri. The people of her district just decided it was time to pick someone who puts them first.

So AIPAC buying a candidate to unseat her was because......

What specifically about aipac explains Cori bush getting fewer votes than her opponent?

Are you new to this country (or planet earth)? AIPAC spent millions in campaign support to effectuate this outcome. That led to more votes for her opponent, who will gladly suck on the AIPAC garden hose spewing droplets of water, and then do AIPAC's bidding to secure a tidal wave of ROI to Israel in return. He will also support oversized legislative representation for Israel's interests, which include those of many Jewish Americans.

At the end of the day elections come down to votes. That’s democracy. If you don’t like it, move to Iran.

[Anonymous]

It's nice to see awful extremes defeated. Let's hope the same happens to MTG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cori Bush lost because she is bad at her job. She's now ranting against AIPAC and how she is "radicalized" and is going to go after "their kingdom". That shows you where her focus is, and it's not Missouri. The people of her district just decided it was time to pick someone who puts them first.

So AIPAC buying a candidate to unseat her was because......

What specifically about aipac explains Cori bush getting fewer votes than her opponent?

Are you new to this country (or planet earth)? AIPAC spent millions in campaign support to effectuate this outcome. That led to more votes for her opponent, who will gladly suck on the AIPAC garden hose spewing droplets of water, and then do AIPAC's bidding to secure a tidal wave of ROI to Israel in return. He will also support oversized legislative representation for Israel's interests, which include those of many Jewish Americans.

At the end of the day elections come down to votes. That’s democracy. If you don’t like it, move to Iran.

How much of a democracy do we have if the rich can buy votes? These are the same concerns we had in 2016 about "Russian influence" but now it's OK because it's Israel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cori Bush lost because she is bad at her job. She's now ranting against AIPAC and how she is "radicalized" and is going to go after "their kingdom". That shows you where her focus is, and it's not Missouri. The people of her district just decided it was time to pick someone who puts them first.

So AIPAC buying a candidate to unseat her was because......

What specifically about aipac explains Cori bush getting fewer votes than her opponent?

You should ask AIPAC why they invested so much money in her opponent. Yes, it was an investment. The minute he steps out of line, they will buy another candidate to oppose him.

Why would AIPAC back a hateful antisemite? Of course they are going to back whoever is not like that. It's just common sense. And then people vote however they want to.

Please provide proof of her antisemitism.

DP

The confused look on the face of the person wielding the "anti-semitism" cudgel - hilarious.

"What do you mean "proof"? We don't need to provide "proof" of anything. We just say the magic word and people scurry away as fast as they can because they know it's just a tactic to stifle debate by signaling an attack of your opponent's personal and professional lives, and then we can return to our regularly schedule programming - The Corruption of America by a Foreign Government whose interests align with less than 2% of America's population.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cori Bush lost because she is bad at her job. She's now ranting against AIPAC and how she is "radicalized" and is going to go after "their kingdom". That shows you where her focus is, and it's not Missouri. The people of her district just decided it was time to pick someone who puts them first.

So AIPAC buying a candidate to unseat her was because......

What specifically about aipac explains Cori bush getting fewer votes than her opponent?

Are you new to this country (or planet earth)? AIPAC spent millions in campaign support to effectuate this outcome. That led to more votes for her opponent, who will gladly suck on the AIPAC garden hose spewing droplets of water, and then do AIPAC's bidding to secure a tidal wave of ROI to Israel in return. He will also support oversized legislative representation for Israel's interests, which include those of many Jewish Americans.

At the end of the day elections come down to votes. That’s democracy. If you don’t like it, move to Iran.

You're only willing to accept that because the outcome favors your interests. If the votes favored Rashida Tlaib and company, you'd have a different tune.

Should all of the people attacking Tlaib over the years been told to move to Israel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cori Bush lost because she is bad at her job. She's now ranting against AIPAC and how she is "radicalized" and is going to go after "their kingdom". That shows you where her focus is, and it's not Missouri. The people of her district just decided it was time to pick someone who puts them first.

So AIPAC buying a candidate to unseat her was because......

What specifically about aipac explains Cori bush getting fewer votes than her opponent?

You should ask AIPAC why they invested so much money in her opponent. Yes, it was an investment. The minute he steps out of line, they will buy another candidate to oppose him.

Why would AIPAC back a hateful antisemite? Of course they are going to back whoever is not like that. It's just common sense. And then people vote however they want to.

Please provide proof of her antisemitism.

DP

The confused look on the face of the person wielding the "anti-semitism" cudgel - hilarious.

"What do you mean "proof"? We don't need to provide "proof" of anything. We just say the magic word and people scurry away as fast as they can because they know it's just a tactic to stifle debate by signaling an attack of your opponent's personal and professional lives, and then we can return to our regularly schedule programming - The Corruption of America by a Foreign Government whose interests align with less than 2% of America's population.

It's come to the point that if one isn't pro-Israel, then one is labeled an antisemite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cori Bush lost because she is bad at her job. She's now ranting against AIPAC and how she is "radicalized" and is going to go after "their kingdom". That shows you where her focus is, and it's not Missouri. The people of her district just decided it was time to pick someone who puts them first.

So AIPAC buying a candidate to unseat her was because......

What specifically about aipac explains Cori bush getting fewer votes than her opponent?

Are you new to this country (or planet earth)? AIPAC spent millions in campaign support to effectuate this outcome. That led to more votes for her opponent, who will gladly suck on the AIPAC garden hose spewing droplets of water, and then do AIPAC's bidding to secure a tidal wave of ROI to Israel in return. He will also support oversized legislative representation for Israel's interests, which include those of many Jewish Americans.

Wow. Are you a professor or administrator at UCLA or Columbia?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's nice to see awful extremes defeated. Let's hope the same happens to MTG.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cori Bush lost because she is bad at her job. She's now ranting against AIPAC and how she is "radicalized" and is going to go after "their kingdom". That shows you where her focus is, and it's not Missouri. The people of her district just decided it was time to pick someone who puts them first.

So AIPAC buying a candidate to unseat her was because......

What specifically about aipac explains Cori bush getting fewer votes than her opponent?

Are you new to this country (or planet earth)? AIPAC spent millions in campaign support to effectuate this outcome. That led to more votes for her opponent, who will gladly suck on the AIPAC garden hose spewing droplets of water, and then do AIPAC's bidding to secure a tidal wave of ROI to Israel in return. He will also support oversized legislative representation for Israel's interests, which include those of many Jewish Americans.

So which of the following are you actually suggesting here?

1. Voter fraud
2. Voters are too stupid to understand the issues
3. An effective campaign was run to turn out votes on a single issue on which the incumbent was not representing the interests of her constituents?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cori Bush lost because she is bad at her job. She's now ranting against AIPAC and how she is "radicalized" and is going to go after "their kingdom". That shows you where her focus is, and it's not Missouri. The people of her district just decided it was time to pick someone who puts them first.

So AIPAC buying a candidate to unseat her was because......

What specifically about aipac explains Cori bush getting fewer votes than her opponent?

You should ask AIPAC why they invested so much money in her opponent. Yes, it was an investment. The minute he steps out of line, they will buy another candidate to oppose him.

Why would AIPAC back a hateful antisemite? Of course they are going to back whoever is not like that. It's just common sense. And then people vote however they want to.

Please provide proof of her antisemitism.

This piece outlines her views, her rhetoric, and her lack of engagement with the Jewish community in her district.
https://jewishinsider.com/2024/07/cori-bush-w...ty-jewish-community/

[Anonymous]

How dare Israel interfere with our elections. This is a foreign country buying congress members. The system must be reformed to stop this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People liked Wesley Bell better.

He is a quality person.

Cori Bush is under investigation for paying her husband illegally.

[Anonymous]

Cori Bush is radicalized. (Her own words.)