|
Yes. Of course. The very "a ring" thing feels vestigial to me. We moved in together after 6 years, bought a house together after 10, and I was given "a ring" at 14 -- mainly because I really like diamonds.
There is an ancient, outdated, anti-feminist way of doing things being endorsed quite a bit on this thread. Further proof that the demo of DCUM skews boomer. |
But he still won't marry you, right? |
Is this supposed to be the prize? Very anti-feminist. |
The way you think is pretty messed up. A "wifey show test"? Who even thinks of such things to deny that they would engage in them? Weird. |
|
No. Not at your age.
Really, at your age, if he hasn’t already brought up a timeline for marriage first, you’re already off on a bad foot. Disregard this at your peril. |
Would you say the same to a man? |
| OP here. We have discussed timelines and wants throughout our entire relationship. We became pretty serious at 6 months and he brought up marriage. He said I love you for the first time and told me he was in love with me. At 1 year, he brought up marriage again. He told me flat out that he wants to marry me and build a life together and needed to know I was on the same page. We discussed moving in together this month. We both own our own condos and I will be moving in to his. My plan is to rent it out mine until I feel it’s right to sell. I do think a ring is in the near future. When discussing engagement, he said that it will happen when it happens and that moving in together and seeing how we cohabit is the next best step. |
What? We've been married 7 years. Together for 20. Very happy. Not sure what difference it makes? I'm not desperate like you, so I don't obsess over these things. I don't think confident women who have amazing men who love them do. |
| It doesn't have to be anti feminist, you can both give each other rings. Same way for marriage, minor girl's dad throwing wedding and giving dowry is anti feminist but adult man and women announcing and celebrating being a couple, is perfectly fine. |
So what? It's still a fact. You're shacking up for 14 years with a man who can buy you off with a diamond because you like to play house and pretend that you have a full committed relationship. You may be fooling yourself, but everyone else sees right through it. |
| It's not about desperation, more about being on the same page or moving on to another book. Life is short. |
No. Moving in together to "see how we cohabit" is not the next best step. Just be fully aware that you are still auditioning for the role as his wife, OP. If you're Ok with that, go ahead. But I wouldn't do it. Question: have you met his parents and family yet? |
| If marriage is so archaic then why gas and lesbians were fighting so hard for it? |
A lifetime together will present MUCH bigger challenges than just figuring out how to coexist in the same space 24/7 for a few months. Living together before marriage tells you very little about whether the marriage will survive, or even how compatible you are. |
OP here. I have. We have vacationed with them several times, I’ve been his date to 2 family weddings, and we hang out with his friends and family often. His mom and I also do outings just us. |