Cameron Diaz and Benji Madden welcome baby boy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Cardinal is a nice name.

I do, too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And named him “Cardinal.” Almost as bad as Raddix.

Keep in mind, in Hollywood, in her circles, these kinds of names are fine.

+1 attention seeking folks in all aspects of their lives

Or maybe just creative minds?

Sure...names like Cardinal, Summer Rain, Bear, Gravity, Amazonie, and Apple show brilliant creativity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:50 is the new 30

Oh hell no! I’m 54, very fit and active. I have an 18-year old and 16-year one and would not want a baby/toddler at my age.

Being a close to 70-year old mom at your kid’s high school graduation doesn’t sound appealing.

Jane Seymour, Adrienne Barbeau, Cheryl Teigs, Donna Mills, all had children in their 50s. All of these kids are now grown up many Ivy League educated and doing just fine. Age is a construct and fluid. It is a mindset.

Age is biological not psychological. Yes, babies with trust fund and surrogates and staff will be fine, only issue is normalizing it and 50 year olds risking their life and savings to birth babies with genetic disorders and then whole family dealing with the consequences forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like an "oops" blessing?

Via surrogate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:50 is the new 30

Oh hell no! I’m 54, very fit and active. I have an 18-year old and 16-year one and would not want a baby/toddler at my age.

Being a close to 70-year old mom at your kid’s high school graduation doesn’t sound appealing.

Jane Seymour, Adrienne Barbeau, Cheryl Teigs, Donna Mills, all had children in their 50s. All of these kids are now grown up many Ivy League educated and doing just fine. Age is a construct and fluid. It is a mindset.

Age is biological not psychological. Yes, babies with trust fund and surrogates and staff will be fine, only issue is normalizing it and 50 year olds risking their life and savings to birth babies with genetic disorders and then whole family dealing with the consequences forever.

They are not risking genetic disorders because obviously they are not using their own (50 year old) eggs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:50 is the new 30

Oh hell no! I’m 54, very fit and active. I have an 18-year old and 16-year one and would not want a baby/toddler at my age.

Being a close to 70-year old mom at your kid’s high school graduation doesn’t sound appealing.

Jane Seymour, Adrienne Barbeau, Cheryl Teigs, Donna Mills, all had children in their 50s. All of these kids are now grown up many Ivy League educated and doing just fine. Age is a construct and fluid. It is a mindset.

Age is biological not psychological. Yes, babies with trust fund and surrogates and staff will be fine, only issue is normalizing it and 50 year olds risking their life and savings to birth babies with genetic disorders and then whole family dealing with the consequences forever.

They are not risking genetic disorders because obviously they are not using their own (50 year old) eggs.

Even IVf. Using women in their 30s have the embryos tested. Don’t be ridiculous, the risk is not higher It’s lower because the embryos would be tested before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like an "oops" blessing?

Via surrogate?

She doesn’t say anything about a surrogate in her Instagram post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:50 is the new 30

Oh hell no! I’m 54, very fit and active. I have an 18-year old and 16-year one and would not want a baby/toddler at my age.

Being a close to 70-year old mom at your kid’s high school graduation doesn’t sound appealing.

Jane Seymour, Adrienne Barbeau, Cheryl Teigs, Donna Mills, all had children in their 50s. All of these kids are now grown up many Ivy League educated and doing just fine. Age is a construct and fluid. It is a mindset.

Age is biological not psychological. Yes, babies with trust fund and surrogates and staff will be fine, only issue is normalizing it and 50 year olds risking their life and savings to birth babies with genetic disorders and then whole family dealing with the consequences forever.

They are not risking genetic disorders because obviously they are not using their own (50 year old) eggs.

Even IVf. Using women in their 30s have the embryos tested. Don’t be ridiculous, the risk is not higher It’s lower because the embryos would be tested before.

You need to visit classes for those with special needs in schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can never understand why rich people (of all people) can’t figure out how to have kids in their 30s. She had the money then to hire a surrogate. It makes not sense to put this off until the last minute. It’s not fair to the kids at all and we should not normalize this.

+1. Barren old bags buying another woman’s eggs and paying another underclass woman to carry it. Exploitative and depraved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:50 is the new 30

Oh hell no! I’m 54, very fit and active. I have an 18-year old and 16-year one and would not want a baby/toddler at my age.

Being a close to 70-year old mom at your kid’s high school graduation doesn’t sound appealing.

Jane Seymour, Adrienne Barbeau, Cheryl Teigs, Donna Mills, all had children in their 50s. All of these kids are now grown up many Ivy League educated and doing just fine. Age is a construct and fluid. It is a mindset.

Age is biological not psychological. Yes, babies with trust fund and surrogates and staff will be fine, only issue is normalizing it and 50 year olds risking their life and savings to birth babies with genetic disorders and then whole family dealing with the consequences forever.

They are not risking genetic disorders because obviously they are not using their own (50 year old) eggs.

Old age sperm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:50 is the new 30

Oh hell no! I’m 54, very fit and active. I have an 18-year old and 16-year one and would not want a baby/toddler at my age.

Being a close to 70-year old mom at your kid’s high school graduation doesn’t sound appealing.

Jane Seymour, Adrienne Barbeau, Cheryl Teigs, Donna Mills, all had children in their 50s. All of these kids are now grown up many Ivy League educated and doing just fine. Age is a construct and fluid. It is a mindset.

Age is biological not psychological. Yes, babies with trust fund and surrogates and staff will be fine, only issue is normalizing it and 50 year olds risking their life and savings to birth babies with genetic disorders and then whole family dealing with the consequences forever.

They are not risking genetic disorders because obviously they are not using their own (50 year old) eggs.

Old age sperm?

does not matter
, Even if they use their own, during IVF, the embryos are genetically tested. Any that have problems are discarded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:50 is the new 30

Oh hell no! I’m 54, very fit and active. I have an 18-year old and 16-year one and would not want a baby/toddler at my age.

Being a close to 70-year old mom at your kid’s high school graduation doesn’t sound appealing.

Jane Seymour, Adrienne Barbeau, Cheryl Teigs, Donna Mills, all had children in their 50s. All of these kids are now grown up many Ivy League educated and doing just fine. Age is a construct and fluid. It is a mindset.

Age is biological not psychological. Yes, babies with trust fund and surrogates and staff will be fine, only issue is normalizing it and 50 year olds risking their life and savings to birth babies with genetic disorders and then whole family dealing with the consequences forever.

They are not risking genetic disorders because obviously they are not using their own (50 year old) eggs.

Old age sperm?

does not matter
, Even if they use their own, during IVF, the embryos are genetically tested. Any that have problems are discarded.

No genetic test is going to detect autism, ADHD, etc.

[Anonymous]

Happy for her I guess.

[Anonymous]

Way too old. Poor kids.

[Anonymous]

Do 50+ women who use surrogates typically use their own eggs?