Valerie Bettinelli is not OK

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's making the rounds promoting her new book and is also in People magazine talking about falling in love again. She just met him in person in March (four-five weeks ago?) and they have a rule about seeing each other every three weeks.

“We never go longer than that without seeing each other,” says Bertinelli, who's new cookbook Indulge is out now. “After all, it’s about finding the joy in life and sharing it.”

https://people.com/valerie-bertinelli-reveals-three-week-rule-keeping-her-new-romance-alive-exclusive-8623644

If she sees him every three weeks at a minimum and just met him in March, and she's announcing this rule now, does that mean she's seen him once only? (Otherwise, it seems you'd be seeing him all the time and wouldn't mention that rule until it was at the point you were not seeing each other frequently.)

is it the realhoarse guy on twitter or were they just joking around about it?

[Anonymous]

LOL keep dishing the hot relationship takes, Val! You’re track record shows you’re a great picker.

[Anonymous]

Learn grammar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm baffled why all of you care? She was born in 1960. I saw her in sit-coms. Why on earth do you think posting here is "newsworthy". She is over the hill and needs to generate news about herself to keep her agent interested. how do you not know this?

You are an age-ist a**hole.

Life will teach you a few things in the years ahead.

2nd this. Really sick of some of these jerks.

[Anonymous]

She was on GMA or one of those shows earlier this week promoting her book.

She’s lost weight and looks like her normal adorable self.

While she’s using all the typical talking points about eating well but not denying herself, I bet she’s using ozempic or something similar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She was on GMA or one of those shows earlier this week promoting her book.

She’s lost weight and looks like her normal adorable self.

While she’s using all the typical talking points about eating well but not denying herself, I bet she’s using ozempic or something similar.

Totally weight loss drugs.

You don’t, after menopause, lose weight eating rich Italian food. It’s not a coincidence that she decided to finally “eat well” and “not deny myself” in the Year of Ozempic.

[Anonymous]

It's too TMI for my taste. Would love to see her back on Kids' Baking Championship. One of my DCs and I enjoy watching that show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's too TMI for my taste. Would love to see her back on Kids' Baking Championship. One of my DCs and I enjoy watching that show.

That’s what I thought as well. But she sure seems needy. And not in a Kardashian in-it-for-the-publicity way, but truly needy of attention and love.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's too TMI for my taste. Would love to see her back on Kids' Baking Championship. One of my DCs and I enjoy watching that show.

That’s what I thought as well. But she sure seems needy. And not in a Kardashian in-it-for-the-publicity way, but truly needy of attention and love.

I agree. Maybe it's that trait that's made her so likable over the past 40+ years in the public eye, but before social media we had no idea of knowing how truly needy actors like her were.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's making the rounds promoting her new book and is also in People magazine talking about falling in love again. She just met him in person in March (four-five weeks ago?) and they have a rule about seeing each other every three weeks.

“We never go longer than that without seeing each other,” says Bertinelli, who's new cookbook Indulge is out now. “After all, it’s about finding the joy in life and sharing it.”

https://people.com/valerie-bertinelli-reveals-three-week-rule-keeping-her-new-romance-alive-exclusive-8623644

If she sees him every three weeks at a minimum and just met him in March, and she's announcing this rule now, does that mean she's seen him once only? (Otherwise, it seems you'd be seeing him all the time and wouldn't mention that rule until it was at the point you were not seeing each other frequently.)

It seems like a weird thing to proclaim about the relationship when they met in person not much longer than three weeks. Also seems kind of soon to be "in love."

[Anonymous]

How is she 64 years old and is still totally adorable looking?! I hope she finds happiness.

[Anonymous]

She looks very happy. Still a bit worried about the new relationship. I also feel like she's announcing it too new

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is she 64 years old and is still totally adorable looking?! I hope she finds happiness.

Right?! her smile lights up a room still. fingers crossed this guy is the one!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's too TMI for my taste. Would love to see her back on Kids' Baking Championship. One of my DCs and I enjoy watching that show.

That’s what I thought as well. But she sure seems needy. And not in a Kardashian in-it-for-the-publicity way, but truly needy of attention and love.

Yea...it's been hard to watch. Her content has been intensely personal and at times very emotional and also sometimes she got pissed and told someone off. It's just a lot and I tuned out at a certain point. It felt like she has poor boundaries.

[Anonymous]

It is hard to convey how boring it has been for me to hear her talk about their weight struggles. Over and over again. Just go into therapy, work deeply there. The persistent need for an audience in her case is exhausting. And it's made me lose some respect for her. I just thought she was stronger than she is, I guess. Not sure why, she's in the entertainment business she's not curing cancer. I always liked her but now I'm just bored. Not saying that it's fair or accurate. Her main thing now is not her career but her display of personal problems. Not sure how that was a good idea. Obviously, she's comfortable with it and loves or needs social media. She not only looks young but maybe is emotionally young too, not sure.