| This is your worst nightmare? |
Well, at least if they are doing something illegal then there are avenues to deal with it. Residents in MoCo have had plenty of warning about possible zoning changes, so there is no excuse to not have layer upon layer of lawsuits ready to go using successful campaigns elsewhere as models. They should learn from the successes and mistakes of the lawsuit in Arlington, in particular. However, it seems that their new multi family housing drives won’t be through large scale zoning changes, but rather changes to specific “town centers,” as designated in the new pedestrian master plan. MoCo residents in those areas should expect some changes there, so be prepared. |
|
OP, I've seen this happen, in a brand new development no less. Multiple families, lots of noise, lots of traffic 24/7, trash casually dropped outside all over the place, drug dealing as well.
I guarantee they will not change, and they are not interested in anything you have to say. If you try to point out that yelling and traffic at 2am is disruptive for the neighbors, their response is you're a racist. They say that to shut you up, because they have no intention of changing anything on their end. So your choices are to move, or to try complaining to your local government. You can go nuclear and take the house owners to court in a civil case, but good luck with that. |
Look at her subject line- it isn't about the poor behavior of a neighbor. She is centering the fact that they are renting and that there are several families there. She is asking if THAT is legal. If she didn't care about the rental status she wouldn't have mentioned it. |
Exactly. If you create a thread full of prejudice, you lose the argument. OP, you may want to create a new thread solely to discuss the trash and illegal parking, or whatever you're concerned about. You can mention they are renters in the context of whether you should contact the landlord (yes you should). But it's no use dumping on all renters, and insinuating all renters are subhumans. It's no use generalizing to your belief that this area is going down the drain, and that you want to move, because guess what: you're offending all the posters who live here and like it. TLDR: Learn not to sabotage your own threads! |
They talked about you behind your backs and every time the lease turned over they speculated about if the owner would ever just rent to a nice young family with kids. |
I think people are too busy to notice the group house down the road. It is noticed when the residents are disruptive in negative ways. |
| This is your worst nightmare? Really OP? Perhaps you should mill on that thought a minute then come back to us. |
|
It may be the norm in Alexandria soon also.
|
| Yes- legal, but they might be in violation of the lease without the owner knowing. Can't hurt to send a note. |
I agree. It’s more about the behavior of the residents than their make up. We have single family owners in our neighborhood that don’t abide by any of the neighborhood rules and groups of renters that do. I think what is really making people feel that neighborhoods are in decline is the increase in entitled behaviors of residents that the rules don’t apply to them. |
| Depends where house is located. My town prohibits “grouper” homes |
|
Was OP's post poorly worded? Yes. That said I wouldn't want this going on either, and neither would any of you if you're being honest. No one wants to live next to or near a house where the cars are being parked on the lawn, and trash is strewn about. Is it the worse thing? No of course not, but it's also not ideal.
OP do your research to see what the zoning laws are for your area. Find out if the house was sold as "not primary residence". start from there. Either that or you need to learn to live with it. |
Explain how it is legal when I can look up the property and it says it is owned by X as 'primary residence'. The home was listed as a 4 BR home, yet I can find it now listed as a rental with '6 BR'. Again, absolutely zero construction was done on the house, so how does it magically gain +2 BR so that the investor owner can jam more unrelated people into it in order to max their profits on a home supposedly owned as their 'primary residence'? |
What you want is some sort of law/ordinance that will kick those people out. That likely does not exist. Did the purchaser potentially commit mortgage/tax fraud if they declare it a primary residence? Maybe. But that is only going to affect that person's finances. It isn't going to kick the people out. And the rules on what qualifies as a bedroom are different for listing a rental and listing for purchase. |