Prince Harry press lawsuit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also find it ironic that he and Meghan started their own media company.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand the difference between their media company and a tabloid hacking phones to gather information.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand that someone who wants the press to leave him alone doesn’t create a business that requires constant media promotion to be successful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ah yes the court case about Harry. So why is the Heritage Foundation going after Harry and not the countless other celebs who have been admitted to the US after known drug use? What could it be about Harry I wonder? Hmm…

The other celebs were born here and didn’t lie on their visa applications.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also find it ironic that he and Meghan started their own media company.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand the difference between their media company and a tabloid hacking phones to gather information.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand that someone who wants the press to leave him alone doesn’t create a business that requires constant media promotion to be successful.

Nope. You can create a company AND expect to not be spied upon or harassed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it really weird that he is whining about the press causing Chelsy to break up with him. A happily married person would be over that and not dwelling on it. Seems like he thinks she is the one who got away.

What woman would tolerate their husband fixating on the one that got away?

She can't exactly complain that her husband was fond of an ex when she was previously MARRIED to another man. Remember marriage, when you stand in front of a room full of people and the law and make VOWS of forever to each other?
Clearly, both have past loves.

That’s not what this is about, he’s currently talking about his ex. Is she? Don’t most spouses stop doing that once married?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah yes the court case about Harry. So why is the Heritage Foundation going after Harry and not the countless other celebs who have been admitted to the US after known drug use? What could it be about Harry I wonder? Hmm…

The other celebs were born here and didn’t lie on their visa applications.

Ozzy Osbourne was born here? Known drug user never heard Heritage Foundation ask to see his visa application.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also find it ironic that he and Meghan started their own media company.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand the difference between their media company and a tabloid hacking phones to gather information.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand that someone who wants the press to leave him alone doesn’t create a business that requires constant media promotion to be successful.

If Harry is truly traumatized by his past and the media, he needs to be completely out of public life. If he wants to help specific causes or have an impact on others or whatever argument could be made for a need to stay in the public, he could accomplish those goals without being a public figure subject to media scrutiny. There are plenty of people who do those things and live anonymous, peaceful lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also find it ironic that he and Meghan started their own media company.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand the difference between their media company and a tabloid hacking phones to gather information.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand that someone who wants the press to leave him alone doesn’t create a business that requires constant media promotion to be successful.

If Harry is truly traumatized by his past and the media, he needs to be completely out of public life. If he wants to help specific causes or have an impact on others or whatever argument could be made for a need to stay in the public, he could accomplish those goals without being a public figure subject to media scrutiny. There are plenty of people who do those things and live anonymous, peaceful lives.

Victims of tauma should never be asked to just hide away. Rape vicitims have been told this for year. "If you boss raped you why did you go back to work" Sorrry, but it's not the victim that needs to go away and hide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone following this story? The amount of stress Harry must have had under the tabloids glare is crazy. He says they were a big factor in Chelsy Davy breaking up with him.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/harry-give-evidence-uk-lawsuit-against-tabloid-publisher-2023-06-05/

Of course of course and that's why he chose to marry a media-obsessed second-rate actress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also find it ironic that he and Meghan started their own media company.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand the difference between their media company and a tabloid hacking phones to gather information.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand that someone who wants the press to leave him alone doesn’t create a business that requires constant media promotion to be successful.

This

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also find it ironic that he and Meghan started their own media company.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand the difference between their media company and a tabloid hacking phones to gather information.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand that someone who wants the press to leave him alone doesn’t create a business that requires constant media promotion to be successful.

If Harry is truly traumatized by his past and the media, he needs to be completely out of public life. If he wants to help specific causes or have an impact on others or whatever argument could be made for a need to stay in the public, he could accomplish those goals without being a public figure subject to media scrutiny. There are plenty of people who do those things and live anonymous, peaceful lives.

Victims of tauma should never be asked to just hide away. Rape vicitims have been told this for year. "If you boss raped you why did you go back to work" Sorrry, but it's not the victim that needs to go away and hide.

So if you were mauled by a dog you wouldn't stay away from dogs? This advice makes no sense. Of course people stay away from the things that caused their trauma, if possible. Avoiding the limelight is totally possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also find it ironic that he and Meghan started their own media company.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand the difference between their media company and a tabloid hacking phones to gather information.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand that someone who wants the press to leave him alone doesn’t create a business that requires constant media promotion to be successful.

If Harry is truly traumatized by his past and the media, he needs to be completely out of public life. If he wants to help specific causes or have an impact on others or whatever argument could be made for a need to stay in the public, he could accomplish those goals without being a public figure subject to media scrutiny. There are plenty of people who do those things and live anonymous, peaceful lives.

Victims of tauma should never be asked to just hide away. Rape vicitims have been told this for year. "If you boss raped you why did you go back to work" Sorrry, but it's not the victim that needs to go away and hide.

So if you were mauled by a dog you wouldn't stay away from dogs? This advice makes no sense. Of course people stay away from the things that caused their trauma, if possible. Avoiding the limelight is totally possible.

Sure you could stay away from dogs, but it wouldn’t stop dogs from existing. You could also lobby for increased regulations around dogs or share your story in the media so others could avoid the pain you felt.

[Anonymous]

I think this trial will prompt self-reflection by Harry. He’s not coming off well, and he’s being forced to discuss a past love in a very public way.

I predict he will discuss this in therapy and will grapple with unresolved feelings for a bit before marital problems or addiction issues surface.

He needs a strong wife and a purpose, but living in CA, constantly suing in London, and building a business that requires media attention simply isn’t a good path for him. It is the opposite of what he should be doing.

Had he married Chelsy, he wouid have had the life he was searching for. After all, she is living it and doing well.

[Anonymous]

He is such a stupid moron married to a fame-obsessed moron. They need to go away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I also find it ironic that he and Meghan started their own media company.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand the difference between their media company and a tabloid hacking phones to gather information.

It’s truly sad if you don’t understand that someone who wants the press to leave him alone doesn’t create a business that requires constant media promotion to be successful.

If Harry is truly traumatized by his past and the media, he needs to be completely out of public life. If he wants to help specific causes or have an impact on others or whatever argument could be made for a need to stay in the public, he could accomplish those goals without being a public figure subject to media scrutiny. There are plenty of people who do those things and live anonymous, peaceful lives.

Victims of tauma should never be asked to just hide away. Rape vicitims have been told this for year. "If you boss raped you why did you go back to work" Sorrry, but it's not the victim that needs to go away and hide.

So if you were mauled by a dog you wouldn't stay away from dogs? This advice makes no sense. Of course people stay away from the things that caused their trauma, if possible. Avoiding the limelight is totally possible.

No I would not stay away from all dogs, I would still own a dog, I might even breed dogs. The dog should be trained or put down. If someone is causing people trauma they should be trained or put down.

[Anonymous]

I wish Harry luck with his current lawsuit and overarching privacy campaign…and I look forward to reading all the behind the scenes details in his next book.