Zelensky NATO demand

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Sorry. You're losing badly to the "hohols".

+1 It is interesting to compare the cost to the US of the Ukraine war to that of the war in Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan war cost the US 5.8 *trillion* dollars and 2400 servicemen lives (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/01/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-how-many-people-died/5669656001/) . The Ukraine war has cost the US 54 billion dollars and zero US lives ( https://marketrealist.com/p/how-much-money-has-the-us-sent-to-ukrainie/ ) out of the annual military budget of 770 billion dollars. All that aid to Afghanistan was unable to help them defeat the Taliban, but are clearly on the verge of helping Ukraine defeat the Russian invaders. (This is why the Putin tankies are so desperate to stop any further assistance to Ukraine.)

You real good w numbers.

Now add the 10+ trillion in wealth destruction caused by sanctions….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Disagree

They are fighting for their lives and valiantly …

Irrelevant.

Let’s see what would happen if they had to fund the war themselves…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Sorry. You're losing badly to the "hohols".

+1 It is interesting to compare the cost to the US of the Ukraine war to that of the war in Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan war cost the US 5.8 *trillion* dollars and 2400 servicemen lives (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/01/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-how-many-people-died/5669656001/) . The Ukraine war has cost the US 54 billion dollars and zero US lives ( https://marketrealist.com/p/how-much-money-has-the-us-sent-to-ukrainie/ ) out of the annual military budget of 770 billion dollars. All that aid to Afghanistan was unable to help them defeat the Taliban, but are clearly on the verge of helping Ukraine defeat the Russian invaders. (This is why the Putin tankies are so desperate to stop any further assistance to Ukraine.)

You real good w numbers.

Now add the 10+ trillion in wealth destruction caused by sanctions….

And the most amazing part is that if everyone played nice in the sandbox, none of this money would ever need to be spent!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Disagree

They are fighting for their lives and valiantly …

Irrelevant.

Let’s see what would happen if they had to fund the war themselves…

The same thing as would have happened to the USSR if it had to fund WW2 itself. Luckily we don't have to live in a world where either of those situations happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Sorry. You're losing badly to the "hohols".

+1 It is interesting to compare the cost to the US of the Ukraine war to that of the war in Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan war cost the US 5.8 *trillion* dollars and 2400 servicemen lives (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/01/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-how-many-people-died/5669656001/) . The Ukraine war has cost the US 54 billion dollars and zero US lives ( https://marketrealist.com/p/how-much-money-has-the-us-sent-to-ukrainie/ ) out of the annual military budget of 770 billion dollars. All that aid to Afghanistan was unable to help them defeat the Taliban, but are clearly on the verge of helping Ukraine defeat the Russian invaders. (This is why the Putin tankies are so desperate to stop any further assistance to Ukraine.)

Nice job Jimmy, now do it in $ per day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

You do realize that you're saying the Russians were never prepared to take on the West, right?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1ca52QhGr4

That all the billions of rubles spent on Russian spy networks, spy satellites, electronic warfare, high-tech gadgets, were unable to locate and target Ukrainian assets?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK3vo8DZLbY

The Russian military is the Best in the World, remember?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5ZKivBYQYM

It is absolutely Zelensky who is winning this war. The West isn't driving the logistics trucks to supply their front lines. The West isn't pulling the trigger on the tank gun, or rocket trigger. It's all Ukrainian.

Without the United States and Western allies, the Ukrainians wouldn’t have any logistics to transport or triggers to pull.

Um. Yeah. And without the AK-47 spread around the world, there probably would be millions more people alive?

Hard to point the finger of blame when it's so bloody.

It's not an exercise in blame, it's a statement of fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Sorry. You're losing badly to the "hohols".

+1 It is interesting to compare the cost to the US of the Ukraine war to that of the war in Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan war cost the US 5.8 *trillion* dollars and 2400 servicemen lives (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/01/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-how-many-people-died/5669656001/) . The Ukraine war has cost the US 54 billion dollars and zero US lives ( https://marketrealist.com/p/how-much-money-has-the-us-sent-to-ukrainie/ ) out of the annual military budget of 770 billion dollars. All that aid to Afghanistan was unable to help them defeat the Taliban, but are clearly on the verge of helping Ukraine defeat the Russian invaders. (This is why the Putin tankies are so desperate to stop any further assistance to Ukraine.)

Nice job Jimmy, now do it in $ per day.

OK, Boris I'll do the math for you. We averaged 5 times more military spending per year in each of the twenty years of the Afghanistan war, than we have spent this year assisting Ukraine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Sorry. You're losing badly to the "hohols".

+1 It is interesting to compare the cost to the US of the Ukraine war to that of the war in Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan war cost the US 5.8 *trillion* dollars and 2400 servicemen lives (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/01/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-how-many-people-died/5669656001/) . The Ukraine war has cost the US 54 billion dollars and zero US lives ( https://marketrealist.com/p/how-much-money-has-the-us-sent-to-ukrainie/ ) out of the annual military budget of 770 billion dollars. All that aid to Afghanistan was unable to help them defeat the Taliban, but are clearly on the verge of helping Ukraine defeat the Russian invaders. (This is why the Putin tankies are so desperate to stop any further assistance to Ukraine.)

Nice job Jimmy, now do it in $ per day.

OK, Boris I'll do the math for you. We averaged 5 times more military spending per year in each of the twenty years of the Afghanistan war, than we have spent this year assisting Ukraine.

Big liar not add cost of sanctions crashing europe and your stock market, love, boris

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Sorry. You're losing badly to the "hohols".

+1 It is interesting to compare the cost to the US of the Ukraine war to that of the war in Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan war cost the US 5.8 *trillion* dollars and 2400 servicemen lives (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/01/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-how-many-people-died/5669656001/) . The Ukraine war has cost the US 54 billion dollars and zero US lives ( https://marketrealist.com/p/how-much-money-has-the-us-sent-to-ukrainie/ ) out of the annual military budget of 770 billion dollars. All that aid to Afghanistan was unable to help them defeat the Taliban, but are clearly on the verge of helping Ukraine defeat the Russian invaders. (This is why the Putin tankies are so desperate to stop any further assistance to Ukraine.)

Nice job Jimmy, now do it in $ per day.

OK, Boris I'll do the math for you. We averaged 5 times more military spending per year in each of the twenty years of the Afghanistan war, than we have spent this year assisting Ukraine.

Big liar not add cost of sanctions crashing europe and your stock market, love, boris

I am only including costs to the American taxpayers for military support to our allies. I know Russia is being hurt by the sanctions but Putin knows what to do to end them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Sorry. You're losing badly to the "hohols".

+1 It is interesting to compare the cost to the US of the Ukraine war to that of the war in Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan war cost the US 5.8 *trillion* dollars and 2400 servicemen lives (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/01/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-how-many-people-died/5669656001/) . The Ukraine war has cost the US 54 billion dollars and zero US lives ( https://marketrealist.com/p/how-much-money-has-the-us-sent-to-ukrainie/ ) out of the annual military budget of 770 billion dollars. All that aid to Afghanistan was unable to help them defeat the Taliban, but are clearly on the verge of helping Ukraine defeat the Russian invaders. (This is why the Putin tankies are so desperate to stop any further assistance to Ukraine.)

Nice job Jimmy, now do it in $ per day.

OK, Boris I'll do the math for you. We averaged 5 times more military spending per year in each of the twenty years of the Afghanistan war, than we have spent this year assisting Ukraine.

Big liar not add cost of sanctions crashing europe and your stock market, love, boris

I am only including costs to the American taxpayers for military support to our allies. I know Russia is being hurt by the sanctions but Putin knows what to do to end them.

Cost of your gas?!? Your stocks, your inflation? Depression in Europe.

You dumb American not study math! Love boris

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Sorry. You're losing badly to the "hohols".

+1 It is interesting to compare the cost to the US of the Ukraine war to that of the war in Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan war cost the US 5.8 *trillion* dollars and 2400 servicemen lives (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/01/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-how-many-people-died/5669656001/) . The Ukraine war has cost the US 54 billion dollars and zero US lives ( https://marketrealist.com/p/how-much-money-has-the-us-sent-to-ukrainie/ ) out of the annual military budget of 770 billion dollars. All that aid to Afghanistan was unable to help them defeat the Taliban, but are clearly on the verge of helping Ukraine defeat the Russian invaders. (This is why the Putin tankies are so desperate to stop any further assistance to Ukraine.)

Nice job Jimmy, now do it in $ per day.

OK, Boris I'll do the math for you. We averaged 5 times more military spending per year in each of the twenty years of the Afghanistan war, than we have spent this year assisting Ukraine.

Big liar not add cost of sanctions crashing europe and your stock market, love, boris

I am only including costs to the American taxpayers for military support to our allies. I know Russia is being hurt by the sanctions but Putin knows what to do to end them.

Cost of your gas?!? Your stocks, your inflation? Depression in Europe.

You dumb American not study math! Love boris

Yes if only we had not opposed Putin, then gas would be $2 per gallon, Hurricane Ian would never have happened, and the climate crisis would be over. How could I not have realized this!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Sorry. You're losing badly to the "hohols".

+1 It is interesting to compare the cost to the US of the Ukraine war to that of the war in Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan war cost the US 5.8 *trillion* dollars and 2400 servicemen lives (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/09/01/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-how-many-people-died/5669656001/) . The Ukraine war has cost the US 54 billion dollars and zero US lives ( https://marketrealist.com/p/how-much-money-has-the-us-sent-to-ukrainie/ ) out of the annual military budget of 770 billion dollars. All that aid to Afghanistan was unable to help them defeat the Taliban, but are clearly on the verge of helping Ukraine defeat the Russian invaders. (This is why the Putin tankies are so desperate to stop any further assistance to Ukraine.)

Nice job Jimmy, now do it in $ per day.

OK, Boris I'll do the math for you. We averaged 5 times more military spending per year in each of the twenty years of the Afghanistan war, than we have spent this year assisting Ukraine.

Big liar not add cost of sanctions crashing europe and your stock market, love, boris

I am only including costs to the American taxpayers for military support to our allies. I know Russia is being hurt by the sanctions but Putin knows what to do to end them.

Cost of your gas?!? Your stocks, your inflation? Depression in Europe.

You dumb American not study math! Love boris

Since you love math so much. You understand what this means, right?
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1005416/population-russia-gender-age-group/

And why this is important?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/08/17/russia-ukraine-putin-mother-heroine-award-children/

Because of this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_Russia

Do you think Russia's war with Ukraine accelerates this process?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-10/russia-s-population-is-shrinking-even-as-putin-seeks-expansion

How do you feel about that?

[Anonymous]

The point is, Boris, what do you think will happen to Russia if the Ukraine War continues? What about a nuclear war?

If you truly love Russia, shouldn't you help stop the war?

Or is Russia just a fading civilization?

What do you want for Russia's children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The point is, Boris, what do you think will happen to Russia if the Ukraine War continues? What about a nuclear war?

If you truly love Russia, shouldn't you help stop the war?

Or is Russia just a fading civilization?

What do you want for Russia's children?

You're talking to voices in your head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given that the ONLY reason for Ukraine's success on the battlefield is due to the financial and material support from the United States and other western Allies, what more does Zelensky want?

I think you’re not giving enough credit to the role of excellent examples of Russian tactical failures like “not telling trainees they were going to war” and “lining all their trucks up on a road”

Also, not giving credit to the Ukrainian soldiers. Yes, the West is supplying arms, but Russia had tons of arms and soldiers, and they are a mess.

They're a mess because Russia did not calculate going to war against the United States, which is what essentially the battle in Ukraine has become. It's American intelligence, weapons, logistical support, and money that's driving the Russians back. Sure, it's Ukrainian soldiers who are benefitting from all this support and using it on the battlefield, but it's neither Ukraine nor Zelensky who's winning this war.

Disagree

They are fighting for their lives and valiantly …

Irrelevant.

Let’s see what would happen if they had to fund the war themselves…

Completely relevant as pp erroneously claimed their military success was Solely due to US funding. They are making the most of all the help they are getting with highly motivated citizen soldiers.

Zelensky said all along they could not defeat Russia without a lot of financial and military aid from US and Allies.