Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It was NOT a domestic dispute. If I'm going to hire some guy to shoot my husband (I'm not, FYI) but if I were, I certainly would not have the person do it while I and especially the kids are in the house. She is going to have to pay for years of therapy for those kids. Awful.
I'm guessing either robbery gone wrong, maybe gay lover or complete error.
You're assuming that there was a third party involved. All the police have said was the husband was shot in his own bed at 3AM and the wife was in the house.
Good point. In which case, she won't need to worry about paying for therapy for the kids at all.
I thought I saw somewhere the killer allegedly went out the back door.
Nope. All they said was the back door was open when the police arrived.
I said allegedly. Believed to have.
And I'm saying they didn't even allege and law enforcement never said a third party was involved in the first place. Stop making stuff up.
I'm not the earlier poster, but police said the back door was open when they arrived, and that an adult in the home (wife?) made the 9-1-1 call. So, you think the most logical explanation is the wife opened the back door herself, shot her own husband, then called 9-1-1? "Allegedly" includes reports from people on social media btw. People on social media, who seem to be connected to the family, are saying it was an intruder.
No, in that scenario I think the logical conclusion is they argued, struggled over a weapon, he ends up dead, she wanders around the house wondering what to do and may or may not have opened the back door in the process.
When the cops have not released a notification of a suspect, camera footage from the neighbors or the household - grainy or not, or even a description the most likely culprit is internal. Whether that's someone they knew and the cops are now watching or the spouse themselves.