SPED teacher sues LCPS over ignored sexual assault by student

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why didn’t the teachers just simply call the police?! This would be like me getting raped at work and only complaining to my boss to do something.

Either you’re willfully playing ignorant or you have been given non-desirable genes that impede you from understanding. Have you not seen how LCPS covers up sexual assaults?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reading the thread I actually thought this was about my friend. She is also a SPED teacher in LCPS who has been been sexually assaulted at school. She had a student even rape her with an object. Principal wouldn’t do anything or protect her. She really had ptsd about it and cried before going to school.

Student was verbal. Not intellectually disabled and knew what he was doing.

Crazy to think there are so many students like this in the system.

Raped her with an object? Lady, if you believe this, you are crazy. The students removed her clothing, found an object and raped her, then she continued to work? Didn’t go to the hospital?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reading the thread I actually thought this was about my friend. She is also a SPED teacher in LCPS who has been been sexually assaulted at school. She had a student even rape her with an object. Principal wouldn’t do anything or protect her. She really had ptsd about it and cried before going to school.

Student was verbal. Not intellectually disabled and knew what he was doing.

Crazy to think there are so many students like this in the system.

Raped her with an object? Lady, if you believe this, you are crazy. The students removed her clothing, found an object and raped her, then she continued to work? Didn’t go to the hospital?

Don't even argue with this liar. This is what they want. It helps spread a lie and the nutjobs will believe anything.

[Anonymous]

This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

A child grabbing you isn’t sexual assault. This lady filed a Title IX complaint against a child. A non-verbal disabled child.

Now, I agree with you that the school could have done a bad job supporting the child and implementing the proper behavioral strategies. But I’m inclined to believe the school that the child did better when transferred out of her class. I’ve certainly seen all three things in my time - unstable teachers who can’t cope; schools that don’t provide supports; and kids that do much better when moved from a problematic teacher. What we DO know for sure is that instead of working on the FBA or advocating for the student, this lady decided to create a media spectacle claiming she had been sexually assaulted.

[Anonymous]

This teacher sounds like a pervert.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

A child grabbing you isn’t sexual assault. This lady filed a Title IX complaint against a child. A non-verbal disabled child.

Now, I agree with you that the school could have done a bad job supporting the child and implementing the proper behavioral strategies. But I’m inclined to believe the school that the child did better when transferred out of her class. I’ve certainly seen all three things in my time - unstable teachers who can’t cope; schools that don’t provide supports; and kids that do much better when moved from a problematic teacher. What we DO know for sure is that instead of working on the FBA or advocating for the student, this lady decided to create a media spectacle claiming she had been sexually assaulted.

Yeah but that’s what’s confusing to me. Is it a Title IX complaint that her employer did nothing about her reports of the assault? We don’t know the kid to know how intentional it was but nobody deserves to endure groping by a student. So if the school did nothing, maybe that’s the grounds for complaint. Not against the student themselves. I would also be curious if the movement that supposedly stopped the behavior was into a male teacher’s class. Too many unknowns here to make any clear judgments .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

A child grabbing you isn’t sexual assault. This lady filed a Title IX complaint against a child. A non-verbal disabled child.

Now, I agree with you that the school could have done a bad job supporting the child and implementing the proper behavioral strategies. But I’m inclined to believe the school that the child did better when transferred out of her class. I’ve certainly seen all three things in my time - unstable teachers who can’t cope; schools that don’t provide supports; and kids that do much better when moved from a problematic teacher. What we DO know for sure is that instead of working on the FBA or advocating for the student, this lady decided to create a media spectacle claiming she had been sexually assaulted.

Yeah but that’s what’s confusing to me. Is it a Title IX complaint that her employer did nothing about her reports of the assault? We don’t know the kid to know how intentional it was but nobody deserves to endure groping by a student. So if the school did nothing, maybe that’s the grounds for complaint. Not against the student themselves. I would also be curious if the movement that supposedly stopped the behavior was into a male teacher’s class. Too many unknowns here to make any clear judgments .

+1. When was the FBA conducted?

The admin in this story sound like dopes, too. Good luck ever getting another SPED teacher to work at that school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

A child grabbing you isn’t sexual assault. This lady filed a Title IX complaint against a child. A non-verbal disabled child.

Now, I agree with you that the school could have done a bad job supporting the child and implementing the proper behavioral strategies. But I’m inclined to believe the school that the child did better when transferred out of her class. I’ve certainly seen all three things in my time - unstable teachers who can’t cope; schools that don’t provide supports; and kids that do much better when moved from a problematic teacher. What we DO know for sure is that instead of working on the FBA or advocating for the student, this lady decided to create a media spectacle claiming she had been sexually assaulted.

Yeah but that’s what’s confusing to me. Is it a Title IX complaint that her employer did nothing about her reports of the assault? We don’t know the kid to know how intentional it was but nobody deserves to endure groping by a student. So if the school did nothing, maybe that’s the grounds for complaint. Not against the student themselves. I would also be curious if the movement that supposedly stopped the behavior was into a male teacher’s class. Too many unknowns here to make any clear judgments .

+1. When was the FBA conducted?

The admin in this story sound like dopes, too. Good luck ever getting another SPED teacher to work at that school.

Also possible the FBA was done when the kid was younger and the BIP created as a result of that FBA was no longer effective. If the behavior changes or the function of the behavior, a new FBA and BIP may be necessary. Again, we can’t know. But I’m curious to see how this one plays out. The admin telling them to use a quiet hand sign to discourage the touching sounds like the kind of thing a certain kind of dopey admin would suggest. Particularly a male admin who is not understanding or taking seriously the degree of groping a female teacher was being told to accept at the hands of a student.

[Anonymous]

BUT- and I repeat - Ian prior being in any involved in this is a red flag

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

A child grabbing you isn’t sexual assault. This lady filed a Title IX complaint against a child. A non-verbal disabled child.

Now, I agree with you that the school could have done a bad job supporting the child and implementing the proper behavioral strategies. But I’m inclined to believe the school that the child did better when transferred out of her class. I’ve certainly seen all three things in my time - unstable teachers who can’t cope; schools that don’t provide supports; and kids that do much better when moved from a problematic teacher. What we DO know for sure is that instead of working on the FBA or advocating for the student, this lady decided to create a media spectacle claiming she had been sexually assaulted.

Yeah but that’s what’s confusing to me. Is it a Title IX complaint that her employer did nothing about her reports of the assault? We don’t know the kid to know how intentional it was but nobody deserves to endure groping by a student. So if the school did nothing, maybe that’s the grounds for complaint. Not against the student themselves. I would also be curious if the movement that supposedly stopped the behavior was into a male teacher’s class. Too many unknowns here to make any clear judgments .

Not really. The teacher is making a spectacle out of this and claiming that a non-verbal child had the intent to sexually assault her, and there seems to be a connection between the teacher and the politicized attack on LCPS. At the end of the day they are defaming a disabled child to get Fox News hits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

A child grabbing you isn’t sexual assault. This lady filed a Title IX complaint against a child. A non-verbal disabled child.

Now, I agree with you that the school could have done a bad job supporting the child and implementing the proper behavioral strategies. But I’m inclined to believe the school that the child did better when transferred out of her class. I’ve certainly seen all three things in my time - unstable teachers who can’t cope; schools that don’t provide supports; and kids that do much better when moved from a problematic teacher. What we DO know for sure is that instead of working on the FBA or advocating for the student, this lady decided to create a media spectacle claiming she had been sexually assaulted.

Yeah but that’s what’s confusing to me. Is it a Title IX complaint that her employer did nothing about her reports of the assault? We don’t know the kid to know how intentional it was but nobody deserves to endure groping by a student. So if the school did nothing, maybe that’s the grounds for complaint. Not against the student themselves. I would also be curious if the movement that supposedly stopped the behavior was into a male teacher’s class. Too many unknowns here to make any clear judgments .

+1. When was the FBA conducted?

The admin in this story sound like dopes, too. Good luck ever getting another SPED teacher to work at that school.

Also possible the FBA was done when the kid was younger and the BIP created as a result of that FBA was no longer effective. If the behavior changes or the function of the behavior, a new FBA and BIP may be necessary. Again, we can’t know. But I’m curious to see how this one plays out. The admin telling them to use a quiet hand sign to discourage the touching sounds like the kind of thing a certain kind of dopey admin would suggest. Particularly a male admin who is not understanding or taking seriously the degree of groping a female teacher was being told to accept at the hands of a student.

Even if the school isn’t implementing the BIP then the response is for the team to call an IEP meeting. not sue the school and go on fox.

I read the complaint. It’s a complete hack job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

A child grabbing you isn’t sexual assault. This lady filed a Title IX complaint against a child. A non-verbal disabled child.

Now, I agree with you that the school could have done a bad job supporting the child and implementing the proper behavioral strategies. But I’m inclined to believe the school that the child did better when transferred out of her class. I’ve certainly seen all three things in my time - unstable teachers who can’t cope; schools that don’t provide supports; and kids that do much better when moved from a problematic teacher. What we DO know for sure is that instead of working on the FBA or advocating for the student, this lady decided to create a media spectacle claiming she had been sexually assaulted.

I've seen the same. Sometimes the teachers just seem to hate a kid, particularly the more severely disabled kids and abuse them. Has everyone seen the videos of the 3 teachers from a WV school who abused many non verbal students in their class?

This teacher is using this child to attack LCPS just to help her friends in the crazy group. I feel so sorry for this child and I can't imagine what the parents are feeling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

A child grabbing you isn’t sexual assault. This lady filed a Title IX complaint against a child. A non-verbal disabled child.

Now, I agree with you that the school could have done a bad job supporting the child and implementing the proper behavioral strategies. But I’m inclined to believe the school that the child did better when transferred out of her class. I’ve certainly seen all three things in my time - unstable teachers who can’t cope; schools that don’t provide supports; and kids that do much better when moved from a problematic teacher. What we DO know for sure is that instead of working on the FBA or advocating for the student, this lady decided to create a media spectacle claiming she had been sexually assaulted.

Yeah but that’s what’s confusing to me. Is it a Title IX complaint that her employer did nothing about her reports of the assault? We don’t know the kid to know how intentional it was but nobody deserves to endure groping by a student. So if the school did nothing, maybe that’s the grounds for complaint. Not against the student themselves. I would also be curious if the movement that supposedly stopped the behavior was into a male teacher’s class. Too many unknowns here to make any clear judgments .

If the student has an IEP and a Behavior Plan, they have to follow those and those processes can take time. I'm not a special ed teacher, but every one of them that I know is angry for the student in this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This one’s weird. Ian Prior makes the whole thing dubious. It’s hard to know who LCPS claims the teachers shared the information with or what info it was. However. As a teacher, I can say that the teachers being told that it isn’t sexual assault and to just try goofy diversion tactics rings true. Very difficult to make any judgment based on the limited info available to us though

A child grabbing you isn’t sexual assault. This lady filed a Title IX complaint against a child. A non-verbal disabled child.

Now, I agree with you that the school could have done a bad job supporting the child and implementing the proper behavioral strategies. But I’m inclined to believe the school that the child did better when transferred out of her class. I’ve certainly seen all three things in my time - unstable teachers who can’t cope; schools that don’t provide supports; and kids that do much better when moved from a problematic teacher. What we DO know for sure is that instead of working on the FBA or advocating for the student, this lady decided to create a media spectacle claiming she had been sexually assaulted.

Yeah but that’s what’s confusing to me. Is it a Title IX complaint that her employer did nothing about her reports of the assault? We don’t know the kid to know how intentional it was but nobody deserves to endure groping by a student. So if the school did nothing, maybe that’s the grounds for complaint. Not against the student themselves. I would also be curious if the movement that supposedly stopped the behavior was into a male teacher’s class. Too many unknowns here to make any clear judgments .

If the student has an IEP and a Behavior Plan, they have to follow those and those processes can take time. I'm not a special ed teacher, but every one of them that I know is angry for the student in this case.

I need to go read the complaint I’m guessing. Have to know exactly what information the teacher is alleged to have exposed and to whom.