SRO lite coming back to MCPS as "Community Engagement Officer " CEOs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty angry at the statement from tye BOE president that she is "not interested in seeing SROs return."
Principals teachers and parents want them back.
Who does she work for? Herself?

Some do. Some don’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty angry at the statement from tye BOE president that she is "not interested in seeing SROs return."
Principals teachers and parents want them back.
Who does she work for? Herself?

Some do, some do not.

How many do? How many don't?

Why? It’s not up to a public vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won't be in uniform, and MCPS/School will have a say in who the CEO for the school is.

https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1032627

About time. I think MCPS played this one right. They listened to both sides.

I just don't see the need for these unnecessary expenses.

Right, its better to have students die. Funeral costs are cheaper.

SROs have never prevented a death.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How about we need to force parents to attend school with their kids when their kids are having behavior problems to let the parents deal with it?

Deflection to "its the parents fault and therefore it'd the parents responsibility " is immature and unhelpful.

The fault may be "patenting " but the fault may also be genetic psychiatric disorder, poverty. Ignorance etc. The fault is absolutely irrelevant.

The impact is crucial. The impact of violent students effects all other students and staffing. Mitigation of that impact is squarely and undeniably the responsibility of the Board of Education including McKnight and Wolff

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ummmm this has been happening since we went back to school last August. It was just kept on the down low to appease the anti SRO people……….. sigh.

Agree, someone put some thought into this long before the announcement.

Who are "the anti-SRO people "? Doubts like Wolff is one.

Jawando for one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won't be in uniform, and MCPS/School will have a say in who the CEO for the school is.

https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1032627

About time. I think MCPS played this one right. They listened to both sides.

I just don't see the need for these unnecessary expenses.

Right, its better to have students die. Funeral costs are cheaper.

SROs have never prevented a death.

Yes they have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty angry at the statement from tye BOE president that she is "not interested in seeing SROs return."
Principals teachers and parents want them back.
Who does she work for? Herself?

Some do, some do not.

How many do? How many don't?

Why? It’s not up to a public vote.

Not sure if you understand the concept of representational democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ummmm this has been happening since we went back to school last August. It was just kept on the down low to appease the anti SRO people……….. sigh.

Agree, someone put some thought into this long before the announcement.

Who are "the anti-SRO people "? Doubts like Wolff is one.

Jawando for one.

Hans reimer is another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won't be in uniform, and MCPS/School will have a say in who the CEO for the school is.

https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1032627

About time. I think MCPS played this one right. They listened to both sides.

I just don't see the need for these unnecessary expenses.

Right, its better to have students die. Funeral costs are cheaper.

SROs have never prevented a death.

Yes they have.

No. They haven’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won't be in uniform, and MCPS/School will have a say in who the CEO for the school is.

https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1032627

About time. I think MCPS played this one right. They listened to both sides.

I just don't see the need for these unnecessary expenses.

Right, its better to have students die. Funeral costs are cheaper.

SROs have never prevented a death.

Yes they have.

No. They haven’t.

Yes they have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repeat delinquents need to be removed from the school. There are a handful of kids at my dd's school that are always causing trouble.
take these kids and educate them elsewhere. plenty of empty former school buildings to set this up.

This too

Or make them go virtual

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about we need to force parents to attend school with their kids when their kids are having behavior problems to let the parents deal with it?

Deflection to "its the parents fault and therefore it'd the parents responsibility " is immature and unhelpful.

The fault may be "patenting " but the fault may also be genetic psychiatric disorder, poverty. Ignorance etc. The fault is absolutely irrelevant.

The impact is crucial. The impact of violent students effects all other students and staffing. Mitigation of that impact is squarely and undeniably the responsibility of the Board of Education including McKnight and Wolff

Correct, we need parents to step up and take responsibility for their kids. Good behavior starts at home. You are using the blame game to make excuses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won't be in uniform, and MCPS/School will have a say in who the CEO for the school is.

https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1032627

About time. I think MCPS played this one right. They listened to both sides.

You're wrong. There isn't two sides.
There's a need for safety in school.

Period.

Completely agree. Violence in our schools is not okay, and it must be stopped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repeat delinquents need to be removed from the school. There are a handful of kids at my dd's school that are always causing trouble.
take these kids and educate them elsewhere. plenty of empty former school buildings to set this up.

This too

Or make them go virtual

I like that idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How about we need to force parents to attend school with their kids when their kids are having behavior problems to let the parents deal with it?

But I'm pretty sure those parents don't care what their kids do and wouldn't bother to show up.