SRO lite coming back to MCPS as "Community Engagement Officer " CEOs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty angry at the statement from tye BOE president that she is "not interested in seeing SROs return."
Principals teachers and parents want them back.
Who does she work for? Herself?

Some do, some do not.

How many do? How many don't?

[Anonymous]

What is the alternative? We have removed them and put in RJ/no consequences and look what happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repeat delinquents need to be removed from the school. There are a handful of kids at my dd's school that are always causing trouble.
take these kids and educate them elsewhere. plenty of empty former school buildings to set this up.

This has nothing to do with SRO's

No, but the logic is you kick them out and schools will be safer.

Who decides, based on what premise, that a kid gets kicked out? And, kicked out, what happens then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is the alternative? We have removed them and put in RJ/no consequences and look what happened.

+1 Look at the states I (OP) posted in the past 4 months alone. This is why MCPS had to take a look at CEOs or SROs again in our schools.

Most people agree that the pandemic caused a lot of mental health issues, including in youths.

This coupled with RJ, no SROs, no consequences, staff hands are tied = uptick in violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repeat delinquents need to be removed from the school. There are a handful of kids at my dd's school that are always causing trouble.
take these kids and educate them elsewhere. plenty of empty former school buildings to set this up.

This has nothing to do with SRO's

No, but the logic is you kick them out and schools will be safer.

Who decides, based on what premise, that a kid gets kicked out? And, kicked out, what happens then?

DP, obviously MCPS leadership has to make the call. They can bring back the alternative schools.

Personally, I think kids 16+ who have numerous behaviorial issues should be sent to some type of military school paid for by the taxpayers.

They get discipline and learn a trade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repeat delinquents need to be removed from the school. There are a handful of kids at my dd's school that are always causing trouble.
take these kids and educate them elsewhere. plenty of empty former school buildings to set this up.

This has nothing to do with SRO's

No, but the logic is you kick them out and schools will be safer.

Who decides, based on what premise, that a kid gets kicked out? And, kicked out, what happens then?

DP, obviously MCPS leadership has to make the call. They can bring back the alternative schools.

Personally, I think kids 16+ who have numerous behaviorial issues should be sent to some type of military school paid for by the taxpayers.

They get discipline and learn a trade.

Still has nothing to do with SROs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repeat delinquents need to be removed from the school. There are a handful of kids at my dd's school that are always causing trouble.
take these kids and educate them elsewhere. plenty of empty former school buildings to set this up.

This has nothing to do with SRO's

No, but the logic is you kick them out and schools will be safer.

Who decides, based on what premise, that a kid gets kicked out? And, kicked out, what happens then?

DP, obviously MCPS leadership has to make the call. They can bring back the alternative schools.

Personally, I think kids 16+ who have numerous behaviorial issues should be sent to some type of military school paid for by the taxpayers.

They get discipline and learn a trade.

Still has nothing to do with SROs.

? they are bringing in CEOs rather than SROs, but these are still cops.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty angry at the statement from tye BOE president that she is "not interested in seeing SROs return."
Principals teachers and parents want them back.
Who does she work for? Herself?

Some do, some do not.

How many do? How many don't?

don't know since they never polled the parents (did they?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They won't be in uniform, and MCPS/School will have a say in who the CEO for the school is.

https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1032627

About time. I think MCPS played this one right. They listened to both sides.

I just don't see the need for these unnecessary expenses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty angry at the statement from tye BOE president that she is "not interested in seeing SROs return."
Principals teachers and parents want them back.
Who does she work for? Herself?

Some do, some do not.

How many do? How many don't?

She's got my vote!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repeat delinquents need to be removed from the school. There are a handful of kids at my dd's school that are always causing trouble.
take these kids and educate them elsewhere. plenty of empty former school buildings to set this up.

This has nothing to do with SRO's

No, but the logic is you kick them out and schools will be safer.

Who decides, based on what premise, that a kid gets kicked out? And, kicked out, what happens then?

DP, obviously MCPS leadership has to make the call. They can bring back the alternative schools.

Personally, I think kids 16+ who have numerous behaviorial issues should be sent to some type of military school paid for by the taxpayers.

They get discipline and learn a trade.

Still has nothing to do with SROs.

? they are bringing in CEOs rather than SROs, but these are still cops.

But they don’t deal with delinquents. They deal with violent students.

Cops dealing with violent offenders is appropriate. Cops dealing with non-violent students is nit appropriate. Glad the new model will keep cops away from non- violent children.

They are not dealing with discipline they are dealing with violent criminals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repeat delinquents need to be removed from the school. There are a handful of kids at my dd's school that are always causing trouble.
take these kids and educate them elsewhere. plenty of empty former school buildings to set this up.

This has nothing to do with SRO's

No, but the logic is you kick them out and schools will be safer.

Who decides, based on what premise, that a kid gets kicked out? And, kicked out, what happens then?

Who decides: the same people who decide special needs placement
Sent where: to the same schools they used to have for behavior issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won't be in uniform, and MCPS/School will have a say in who the CEO for the school is.

https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1032627

About time. I think MCPS played this one right. They listened to both sides.

I just don't see the need for these unnecessary expenses.

Doubt you have a child in mcps this year.

[Anonymous]

How about we need to force parents to attend school with their kids when their kids are having behavior problems to let the parents deal with it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won't be in uniform, and MCPS/School will have a say in who the CEO for the school is.

https://www.fox5dc.com/video/1032627

About time. I think MCPS played this one right. They listened to both sides.

I just don't see the need for these unnecessary expenses.

Right, its better to have students die. Funeral costs are cheaper.