Youngkin creates tip line for parents and students to report teachers for Thought Crime

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why has this devolved to talking about teaching slavery? It isn't about not teaching about slavery and the associated political history.

This is about so-called anti-racist and CRT influenced ideas being used in public schools. Call it the successor ideology, whatever you want. If this were about not teaching slavery or Jim Crow, and so on, it would have been an issue three, four, five, six, seven... years ago. But it wasn't. Why?

Because white conservatives are not allowed to be against teaching the history of slavery and civil rights movement of the 1960s. There's social consequences for things like that (or there were...). So, instead, they attack adjacent movements and modern leaders in the civil rights struggle.

It's called Dog Whistle politics. And wealthy conservatives have been doing it since forever to get poor whites agitated.

So if that is what you believe, stop with the discussion about practical history already being taught.

Start discussing what is actually being newly taught. Defend it. Justify it.

What is being taught? Show me what's being taught in your child's classroom that is so offensive. The onus is on those screaming "CRT!!! Report the teachers to the police!!!" to show that inappropriate materials are being forced onto their children.

You and your interest groups are railing against something that really isn't happening inside of classrooms. There are no CRT materials in my kids' classes.

To the extent that their are inappropriate teachers saying unhinged things, that's happened since forever. That happened when I was in high school and those teachers were eventually removed from their classes.

But this ideological witchhunt by the Governor and Virginia conservatives is insane.

It's not about "CRT materials." This is not some rigid case that involves only teaching kids to be critical theorists. But you know that . The argument is about CRT-related concepts becoming integral to schooling: anti-racist pedagogy, so-called inherent privilege, the "white supremacy" of educational and cultural norms, systemic bias, etc.

If you want to learn more about what these people disagree with, you can look at the EdEquityVA site, although much of that site is now gone so you have to look at its history. There are many institutions that partner with schools that describe how CRT-related ideas should be applied to influence educators and in teaching. I believe SPLC does to some degree. There are others. Many Virginia schools have partnered with these types of people and organizations to alter curriculums and teaching methods. That isn't a secret. You can read the contracts.

From the EdEquityVA site "anti-racism requires acknowledging that racist beliefs and structures are pervasive in education and then actively doing work to tear down those beliefs and structures." If you believe racist beliefs are pervasive in education, and existing educational norms should be torn down, that is fine. But there are people who disagree with that, and they are pushing back. This isn't about making people like slavery. But if you want to reduce it to such laziness, you're perfectly welcome.

+1
The Leadership Academy is another business which FCPS spent thousands contracting and consulting with for teacher training. Here's some mission statements from their website:

To consistently provide each student access to the learning opportunities they need to excel, schools need strong culturally responsive leaders. We define culturally responsive leadership as being able to recognize how institutionalized racism affects your own life and the lives of the students and families you work with, and embracing your role in mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. Culturally responsive leaders focus on academic success, cultural competence, and developing students’ and educators’ abilities to think critically about the world around them. They create learning experiences intentionally built to meet the needs of every child. Being culturally responsive is the work at the heart of making school systems more equitable. We support school and school system leaders in using an equity lens to implement a vision, build strong school and district culture, set clear and high expectations, and develop and lead principals and teachers who ensure rigorous and culturally responsive instruction and the opportunity for all students to be successful.

We offer research-based hands-on, job-embedded learning experiences and deep group instruction to maximize development, and guide leaders through hard conversations on race and bias, developing their ability to lead their own staff in the work required to disrupt systemic inequities. A strategic approach is essential for making authentic and sustainable growth and change. We help leaders and their teams conduct equity-informed assessments of systems, policies, and practices, and use those findings to prioritize needs and develop and implement longer-term strategies. We provide and can customize professional learning that develops culturally responsive leaders equipped with the knowledge, skills, and resources to advance equity, including reflecting on their personal equity journey, defining and observing culturally responsive instruction, and building school and family coalitions.

https://www.leadershipacademy.org/about-us/

Would you please explain your opposition to the bolded? You aft as if it is self evident but I truly do not understand why it is a problem for teachers to be mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. I want my community to be anti-oppression. Do you not agree?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why has this devolved to talking about teaching slavery? It isn't about not teaching about slavery and the associated political history.

This is about so-called anti-racist and CRT influenced ideas being used in public schools. Call it the successor ideology, whatever you want. If this were about not teaching slavery or Jim Crow, and so on, it would have been an issue three, four, five, six, seven... years ago. But it wasn't. Why?

Because white conservatives are not allowed to be against teaching the history of slavery and civil rights movement of the 1960s. There's social consequences for things like that (or there were...). So, instead, they attack adjacent movements and modern leaders in the civil rights struggle.

It's called Dog Whistle politics. And wealthy conservatives have been doing it since forever to get poor whites agitated.

So if that is what you believe, stop with the discussion about practical history already being taught.

Start discussing what is actually being newly taught. Defend it. Justify it.

What is being taught? Show me what's being taught in your child's classroom that is so offensive. The onus is on those screaming "CRT!!! Report the teachers to the police!!!" to show that inappropriate materials are being forced onto their children.

You and your interest groups are railing against something that really isn't happening inside of classrooms. There are no CRT materials in my kids' classes.

To the extent that their are inappropriate teachers saying unhinged things, that's happened since forever. That happened when I was in high school and those teachers were eventually removed from their classes.

But this ideological witchhunt by the Governor and Virginia conservatives is insane.

It's not about "CRT materials." This is not some rigid case that involves only teaching kids to be critical theorists. But you know that . The argument is about CRT-related concepts becoming integral to schooling: anti-racist pedagogy, so-called inherent privilege, the "white supremacy" of educational and cultural norms, systemic bias, etc.

If you want to learn more about what these people disagree with, you can look at the EdEquityVA site, although much of that site is now gone so you have to look at its history. There are many institutions that partner with schools that describe how CRT-related ideas should be applied to influence educators and in teaching. I believe SPLC does to some degree. There are others. Many Virginia schools have partnered with these types of people and organizations to alter curriculums and teaching methods. That isn't a secret. You can read the contracts.

From the EdEquityVA site "anti-racism requires acknowledging that racist beliefs and structures are pervasive in education and then actively doing work to tear down those beliefs and structures." If you believe racist beliefs are pervasive in education, and existing educational norms should be torn down, that is fine. But there are people who disagree with that, and they are pushing back. This isn't about making people like slavery. But if you want to reduce it to such laziness, you're perfectly welcome.

+1
The Leadership Academy is another business which FCPS spent thousands contracting and consulting with for teacher training. Here's some mission statements from their website:

To consistently provide each student access to the learning opportunities they need to excel, schools need strong culturally responsive leaders. We define culturally responsive leadership as being able to recognize how institutionalized racism affects your own life and the lives of the students and families you work with, and embracing your role in mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. Culturally responsive leaders focus on academic success, cultural competence, and developing students’ and educators’ abilities to think critically about the world around them. They create learning experiences intentionally built to meet the needs of every child. Being culturally responsive is the work at the heart of making school systems more equitable. We support school and school system leaders in using an equity lens to implement a vision, build strong school and district culture, set clear and high expectations, and develop and lead principals and teachers who ensure rigorous and culturally responsive instruction and the opportunity for all students to be successful.

We offer research-based hands-on, job-embedded learning experiences and deep group instruction to maximize development, and guide leaders through hard conversations on race and bias, developing their ability to lead their own staff in the work required to disrupt systemic inequities. A strategic approach is essential for making authentic and sustainable growth and change. We help leaders and their teams conduct equity-informed assessments of systems, policies, and practices, and use those findings to prioritize needs and develop and implement longer-term strategies. We provide and can customize professional learning that develops culturally responsive leaders equipped with the knowledge, skills, and resources to advance equity, including reflecting on their personal equity journey, defining and observing culturally responsive instruction, and building school and family coalitions.

https://www.leadershipacademy.org/about-us/

Would you please explain your opposition to the bolded? You aft as if it is self evident but I truly do not understand why it is a problem for teachers to be mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. I want my community to be anti-oppression. Do you not agree?

I want my kids to be educated - using facts and sources. I do not want my kids listening to a teacher lecture them on "systemic oppression." That's where critical thinking comes in. Learning from history, so as not to repeat mistakes. Not being sanctimoniously lectured about racism and "inherent bias." That's something parents can teach their own kids about.

Luckily, my youngest is about to graduate, so we will be done with the lunacy that FCPS has recently embraced. I'm sure you'll enjoy it, however.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The tip line is probably set up so people can report stupid things--e.g. the "Privilege Bingo" at an FCPS high school. The one that had you win if your parents are married, are white, and a "military kid."

Exactly. And the survey given to my kid at another FCPS high school stating that if you have ever used a Southern, Australian, or British accent, you have committed a micro-aggression. Oh, and also if you've ever considered Asian kids good at math. Micro-aggression. And frankly, this garbage *does* need to be called out.

Why can’t you simply not use stereotypes since they are offensive to many people? If you are not a bully then that shouldn’t be a problem. And if you are so offended by people opposing your use offensive stereotypes and organizing against it then are you not being a hypocrite by organizing and opposing something that offends you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why has this devolved to talking about teaching slavery? It isn't about not teaching about slavery and the associated political history.

This is about so-called anti-racist and CRT influenced ideas being used in public schools. Call it the successor ideology, whatever you want. If this were about not teaching slavery or Jim Crow, and so on, it would have been an issue three, four, five, six, seven... years ago. But it wasn't. Why?

Because white conservatives are not allowed to be against teaching the history of slavery and civil rights movement of the 1960s. There's social consequences for things like that (or there were...). So, instead, they attack adjacent movements and modern leaders in the civil rights struggle.

It's called Dog Whistle politics. And wealthy conservatives have been doing it since forever to get poor whites agitated.

So if that is what you believe, stop with the discussion about practical history already being taught.

Start discussing what is actually being newly taught. Defend it. Justify it.

What is being taught? Show me what's being taught in your child's classroom that is so offensive. The onus is on those screaming "CRT!!! Report the teachers to the police!!!" to show that inappropriate materials are being forced onto their children.

You and your interest groups are railing against something that really isn't happening inside of classrooms. There are no CRT materials in my kids' classes.

To the extent that their are inappropriate teachers saying unhinged things, that's happened since forever. That happened when I was in high school and those teachers were eventually removed from their classes.

But this ideological witchhunt by the Governor and Virginia conservatives is insane.

It's not about "CRT materials." This is not some rigid case that involves only teaching kids to be critical theorists. But you know that . The argument is about CRT-related concepts becoming integral to schooling: anti-racist pedagogy, so-called inherent privilege, the "white supremacy" of educational and cultural norms, systemic bias, etc.

If you want to learn more about what these people disagree with, you can look at the EdEquityVA site, although much of that site is now gone so you have to look at its history. There are many institutions that partner with schools that describe how CRT-related ideas should be applied to influence educators and in teaching. I believe SPLC does to some degree. There are others. Many Virginia schools have partnered with these types of people and organizations to alter curriculums and teaching methods. That isn't a secret. You can read the contracts.

From the EdEquityVA site "anti-racism requires acknowledging that racist beliefs and structures are pervasive in education and then actively doing work to tear down those beliefs and structures." If you believe racist beliefs are pervasive in education, and existing educational norms should be torn down, that is fine. But there are people who disagree with that, and they are pushing back. This isn't about making people like slavery. But if you want to reduce it to such laziness, you're perfectly welcome.

+1
The Leadership Academy is another business which FCPS spent thousands contracting and consulting with for teacher training. Here's some mission statements from their website:

To consistently provide each student access to the learning opportunities they need to excel, schools need strong culturally responsive leaders. We define culturally responsive leadership as being able to recognize how institutionalized racism affects your own life and the lives of the students and families you work with, and embracing your role in mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. Culturally responsive leaders focus on academic success, cultural competence, and developing students’ and educators’ abilities to think critically about the world around them. They create learning experiences intentionally built to meet the needs of every child. Being culturally responsive is the work at the heart of making school systems more equitable. We support school and school system leaders in using an equity lens to implement a vision, build strong school and district culture, set clear and high expectations, and develop and lead principals and teachers who ensure rigorous and culturally responsive instruction and the opportunity for all students to be successful.

We offer research-based hands-on, job-embedded learning experiences and deep group instruction to maximize development, and guide leaders through hard conversations on race and bias, developing their ability to lead their own staff in the work required to disrupt systemic inequities. A strategic approach is essential for making authentic and sustainable growth and change. We help leaders and their teams conduct equity-informed assessments of systems, policies, and practices, and use those findings to prioritize needs and develop and implement longer-term strategies. We provide and can customize professional learning that develops culturally responsive leaders equipped with the knowledge, skills, and resources to advance equity, including reflecting on their personal equity journey, defining and observing culturally responsive instruction, and building school and family coalitions.

https://www.leadershipacademy.org/about-us/

Would you please explain your opposition to the bolded? You aft as if it is self evident but I truly do not understand why it is a problem for teachers to be mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. I want my community to be anti-oppression. Do you not agree?

I want my kids to be educated - using facts and sources. I do not want my kids listening to a teacher lecture them on "systemic oppression." That's where critical thinking comes in. Learning from history, so as not to repeat mistakes. Not being sanctimoniously lectured about racism and "inherent bias." That's something parents can teach their own kids about.

Luckily, my youngest is about to graduate, so we will be done with the lunacy that FCPS has recently embraced. I'm sure you'll enjoy it, however.

Thanks god you will have nothing to do with the schools soon. You sound like a commie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why has this devolved to talking about teaching slavery? It isn't about not teaching about slavery and the associated political history.

This is about so-called anti-racist and CRT influenced ideas being used in public schools. Call it the successor ideology, whatever you want. If this were about not teaching slavery or Jim Crow, and so on, it would have been an issue three, four, five, six, seven... years ago. But it wasn't. Why?

Because white conservatives are not allowed to be against teaching the history of slavery and civil rights movement of the 1960s. There's social consequences for things like that (or there were...). So, instead, they attack adjacent movements and modern leaders in the civil rights struggle.

It's called Dog Whistle politics. And wealthy conservatives have been doing it since forever to get poor whites agitated.

So if that is what you believe, stop with the discussion about practical history already being taught.

Start discussing what is actually being newly taught. Defend it. Justify it.

What is being taught? Show me what's being taught in your child's classroom that is so offensive. The onus is on those screaming "CRT!!! Report the teachers to the police!!!" to show that inappropriate materials are being forced onto their children.

You and your interest groups are railing against something that really isn't happening inside of classrooms. There are no CRT materials in my kids' classes.

To the extent that their are inappropriate teachers saying unhinged things, that's happened since forever. That happened when I was in high school and those teachers were eventually removed from their classes.

But this ideological witchhunt by the Governor and Virginia conservatives is insane.

It's not about "CRT materials." This is not some rigid case that involves only teaching kids to be critical theorists. But you know that . The argument is about CRT-related concepts becoming integral to schooling: anti-racist pedagogy, so-called inherent privilege, the "white supremacy" of educational and cultural norms, systemic bias, etc.

If you want to learn more about what these people disagree with, you can look at the EdEquityVA site, although much of that site is now gone so you have to look at its history. There are many institutions that partner with schools that describe how CRT-related ideas should be applied to influence educators and in teaching. I believe SPLC does to some degree. There are others. Many Virginia schools have partnered with these types of people and organizations to alter curriculums and teaching methods. That isn't a secret. You can read the contracts.

From the EdEquityVA site "anti-racism requires acknowledging that racist beliefs and structures are pervasive in education and then actively doing work to tear down those beliefs and structures." If you believe racist beliefs are pervasive in education, and existing educational norms should be torn down, that is fine. But there are people who disagree with that, and they are pushing back. This isn't about making people like slavery. But if you want to reduce it to such laziness, you're perfectly welcome.

+1
The Leadership Academy is another business which FCPS spent thousands contracting and consulting with for teacher training. Here's some mission statements from their website:

To consistently provide each student access to the learning opportunities they need to excel, schools need strong culturally responsive leaders. We define culturally responsive leadership as being able to recognize how institutionalized racism affects your own life and the lives of the students and families you work with, and embracing your role in mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. Culturally responsive leaders focus on academic success, cultural competence, and developing students’ and educators’ abilities to think critically about the world around them. They create learning experiences intentionally built to meet the needs of every child. Being culturally responsive is the work at the heart of making school systems more equitable. We support school and school system leaders in using an equity lens to implement a vision, build strong school and district culture, set clear and high expectations, and develop and lead principals and teachers who ensure rigorous and culturally responsive instruction and the opportunity for all students to be successful.

We offer research-based hands-on, job-embedded learning experiences and deep group instruction to maximize development, and guide leaders through hard conversations on race and bias, developing their ability to lead their own staff in the work required to disrupt systemic inequities. A strategic approach is essential for making authentic and sustainable growth and change. We help leaders and their teams conduct equity-informed assessments of systems, policies, and practices, and use those findings to prioritize needs and develop and implement longer-term strategies. We provide and can customize professional learning that develops culturally responsive leaders equipped with the knowledge, skills, and resources to advance equity, including reflecting on their personal equity journey, defining and observing culturally responsive instruction, and building school and family coalitions.

https://www.leadershipacademy.org/about-us/

Would you please explain your opposition to the bolded? You aft as if it is self evident but I truly do not understand why it is a problem for teachers to be mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. I want my community to be anti-oppression. Do you not agree?

I want my kids to be educated - using facts and sources. I do not want my kids listening to a teacher lecture them on "systemic oppression." That's where critical thinking comes in. Learning from history, so as not to repeat mistakes. Not being sanctimoniously lectured about racism and "inherent bias." That's something parents can teach their own kids about.

Luckily, my youngest is about to graduate, so we will be done with the lunacy that FCPS has recently embraced. I'm sure you'll enjoy it, however.

If the anti-CRT fanatics were serious about "facts and sources" they wouldn't be so desperate to ban a growing list of books.

They reality is that a bunch of parents just object to any version of history or english that doesn't focus on people like them. It isn't more complicated than that.

[Anonymous]

These people pretending there is no racism in education just astound me. I’m white and went to a very diverse high school, and it was obvious even to stupid, young, blue collar grievance Rush Limbaugh loving me that the black kids weren’t getting a fair shake. Never got extra help because they had potential, never got the benefit of the doubt in a fight, never got recognized for demonstrated skills and accomplishments, never got put in the AP classes. I got all those things and got out, learned better, did better. Black kids smarter and more respectful, polite, and refined than me got stuck.

White boys got IEPs and diagnoses when they acted out. Black kids got suspended. In first grade.

Not all teachers were like this, but enough. Usually the ones that lived in our town and moved away when it got too brown for their tastes and raised their own kids somewhere lilly white. They weren’t calling anyone the n word but they didn’t need to. They didn’t even realize what they were doing was racist.

This was 20 years ago, and those folks are still teaching. Think about how much potential in that town was wasted due to their shit attitudes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why has this devolved to talking about teaching slavery? It isn't about not teaching about slavery and the associated political history.

This is about so-called anti-racist and CRT influenced ideas being used in public schools. Call it the successor ideology, whatever you want. If this were about not teaching slavery or Jim Crow, and so on, it would have been an issue three, four, five, six, seven... years ago. But it wasn't. Why?

Because white conservatives are not allowed to be against teaching the history of slavery and civil rights movement of the 1960s. There's social consequences for things like that (or there were...). So, instead, they attack adjacent movements and modern leaders in the civil rights struggle.

It's called Dog Whistle politics. And wealthy conservatives have been doing it since forever to get poor whites agitated.

So if that is what you believe, stop with the discussion about practical history already being taught.

Start discussing what is actually being newly taught. Defend it. Justify it.

What is being taught? Show me what's being taught in your child's classroom that is so offensive. The onus is on those screaming "CRT!!! Report the teachers to the police!!!" to show that inappropriate materials are being forced onto their children.

You and your interest groups are railing against something that really isn't happening inside of classrooms. There are no CRT materials in my kids' classes.

To the extent that their are inappropriate teachers saying unhinged things, that's happened since forever. That happened when I was in high school and those teachers were eventually removed from their classes.

But this ideological witchhunt by the Governor and Virginia conservatives is insane.

It's not about "CRT materials." This is not some rigid case that involves only teaching kids to be critical theorists. But you know that . The argument is about CRT-related concepts becoming integral to schooling: anti-racist pedagogy, so-called inherent privilege, the "white supremacy" of educational and cultural norms, systemic bias, etc.

If you want to learn more about what these people disagree with, you can look at the EdEquityVA site, although much of that site is now gone so you have to look at its history. There are many institutions that partner with schools that describe how CRT-related ideas should be applied to influence educators and in teaching. I believe SPLC does to some degree. There are others. Many Virginia schools have partnered with these types of people and organizations to alter curriculums and teaching methods. That isn't a secret. You can read the contracts.

From the EdEquityVA site "anti-racism requires acknowledging that racist beliefs and structures are pervasive in education and then actively doing work to tear down those beliefs and structures." If you believe racist beliefs are pervasive in education, and existing educational norms should be torn down, that is fine. But there are people who disagree with that, and they are pushing back. This isn't about making people like slavery. But if you want to reduce it to such laziness, you're perfectly welcome.

+1
The Leadership Academy is another business which FCPS spent thousands contracting and consulting with for teacher training. Here's some mission statements from their website:

To consistently provide each student access to the learning opportunities they need to excel, schools need strong culturally responsive leaders. We define culturally responsive leadership as being able to recognize how institutionalized racism affects your own life and the lives of the students and families you work with, and embracing your role in mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. Culturally responsive leaders focus on academic success, cultural competence, and developing students’ and educators’ abilities to think critically about the world around them. They create learning experiences intentionally built to meet the needs of every child. Being culturally responsive is the work at the heart of making school systems more equitable. We support school and school system leaders in using an equity lens to implement a vision, build strong school and district culture, set clear and high expectations, and develop and lead principals and teachers who ensure rigorous and culturally responsive instruction and the opportunity for all students to be successful.

We offer research-based hands-on, job-embedded learning experiences and deep group instruction to maximize development, and guide leaders through hard conversations on race and bias, developing their ability to lead their own staff in the work required to disrupt systemic inequities. A strategic approach is essential for making authentic and sustainable growth and change. We help leaders and their teams conduct equity-informed assessments of systems, policies, and practices, and use those findings to prioritize needs and develop and implement longer-term strategies. We provide and can customize professional learning that develops culturally responsive leaders equipped with the knowledge, skills, and resources to advance equity, including reflecting on their personal equity journey, defining and observing culturally responsive instruction, and building school and family coalitions.

https://www.leadershipacademy.org/about-us/

Would you please explain your opposition to the bolded? You aft as if it is self evident but I truly do not understand why it is a problem for teachers to be mitigating, disrupting and dismantling systemic oppression. I want my community to be anti-oppression. Do you not agree?

I want my kids to be educated - using facts and sources. I do not want my kids listening to a teacher lecture them on "systemic oppression." That's where critical thinking comes in. Learning from history, so as not to repeat mistakes. Not being sanctimoniously lectured about racism and "inherent bias." That's something parents can teach their own kids about.

Luckily, my youngest is about to graduate, so we will be done with the lunacy that FCPS has recently embraced. I'm sure you'll enjoy it, however.

Education has never been a simple recitation of raw facts, dates, quotes and names. How can someone in DC, where everyone has a graduate degree, ever be under the impression that education is nothing more than rote memorization?

[Anonymous]

I can not believe right wing in this country support thought crimes. What the hell happen to conservatives? Hope parents call in conservatives teachers.

[Anonymous]

You can debate education policy all you want. The fact that there is a line where you report people who think differently to the government should really give you pause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You can debate education policy all you want. The fact that there is a line where you report people who think differently to the government should really give you pause.

Get real. OP said Thought Crime. It just leaves it open to report indoctrination in the classroom. Not personal beliefs. In other words, you cannot say ACAB.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can debate education policy all you want. The fact that there is a line where you report people who think differently to the government should really give you pause.

Get real. OP said Thought Crime. It just leaves it open to report indoctrination in the classroom. Not personal beliefs. In other words, you cannot say ACAB.

Obviously, you never lived in a regime that did exactly such things to indoctrinate the citizens with what it wanted. The mere way this is defined should worry you, as an American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can debate education policy all you want. The fact that there is a line where you report people who think differently to the government should really give you pause.

Get real. OP said Thought Crime. It just leaves it open to report indoctrination in the classroom. Not personal beliefs. In other words, you cannot say ACAB.

You get real. This is 1984 stuff. Look at the language you use. Indoctrination…next you will be talking about re-education camps. How in the hell did we let people like this have any responsibility?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can debate education policy all you want. The fact that there is a line where you report people who think differently to the government should really give you pause.

Get real. OP said Thought Crime. It just leaves it open to report indoctrination in the classroom. Not personal beliefs. In other words, you cannot say ACAB.

The RWNJs pushing all of this define "indoctrination" as any opinion or personal belief they disagree with. Their intention is to ensure that anything taught reflects the right wing view of the world with no dissenters. Look no further than the books and concepts they're anxious to ban as proof of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can debate education policy all you want. The fact that there is a line where you report people who think differently to the government should really give you pause.

Get real. OP said Thought Crime. It just leaves it open to report indoctrination in the classroom. Not personal beliefs. In other words, you cannot say ACAB.

How about if someone says Blue Lives Matter? They'll be investigated and disciplined, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can debate education policy all you want. The fact that there is a line where you report people who think differently to the government should really give you pause.

Get real. OP said Thought Crime. It just leaves it open to report indoctrination in the classroom. Not personal beliefs. In other words, you cannot say ACAB.

You get real. This is 1984 stuff. Look at the language you use. Indoctrination…next you will be talking about re-education camps. How in the hell did we let people like this have any responsibility?

DP. Are you the OP of this thread? Or do you agree with this OP? https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1031920.page
If so, you have absolutely zero self-awareness. Wow.