Bannon indicted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's a list of previous political office holders held in contempt of Congress:

Henry Kissinger
Janet Reno
Harriet Miers
Joshua Bolton
Eric Holder
Lois Lerner
Bryan Pagliano
Bill Barr
Chad Wolf

Yet politicized Biden Regime DOJ arresting Bannon, trashing 1st Amendment.

Or, now hear me out, Bannon and the Trumpists are trashing the concept of co-equal branches of government. I mean, are they all such snowflakes that they can't be man enough to do what Hillary did for 11 hours?

[Anonymous]

Free speech has limits. So says SCOTUS

Inciting violence isn’t protected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Free speech has limits. So says SCOTUS

Inciting violence isn’t protected.

Bannon did not incite violence. You need receipts to prove your statement. Just because you write that statement does not make that true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He helped plan/instigate a violent insurrection that got people killed. None of the nonsense you are spouting about anything else makes a dang bit of difference.

PP (or PPs) who is defending Bannon, can you please respond to this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But what is the consequence of the indictment?

Bannon will not go to jail.

Infuriated Democrats and Country Club Republicans (Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney, McConnell) want to shut Bannon up and end his effective broadcast. Bannon was key to getting sweeping victories in Virginia, New York and New Jersey earlier this month. He is extremely effective communicator and they are scared of his influence.


It’s a scorched-earth attempt to shut Bannon up because he’s incredibly effective in motivating voters to oppose Globalist policies.

^^^^divorced from reality

On planet earth, Bannon was an architect on behalf of the Koch brothers of an autocracy. He has long preached burning down the administrative state and letting what emerges prevail. As such, the Trump administration was about doing as much damage as possible to our institutions as well as the global alliances and institutions. I am no sure why global US companies think that is good for business in the long run, but ultimately, Bannon clearly was deeply involved in 1/6 and helped promote it.

And yes, Bannon is also partially responsible for echoing the falsehoods around CRT that riled enough red voters to support a Trump accolyte in Virginia.

Murphy won NJ, so not sure what PP is talking about re: Republican victories there or in NY.

Frankly, other than losing Virginia, which can also be blamed on McAullife being a horrible candidate who didn't run a robust campaign, the democrats did better than incumbants historically do in the year after a presidential election.

You are wrong about Virginia. Weaponized DOJ and lying AG Garland colluded with School Board Association to label parents domestic terrorists -- that mobilized voters. And failed Biden policies motivated Independents.

That is the version the GQP pushes

In reality, school board members/officials are being threatened with violence and yes, THAT is terrorism

(Jeff-this was in the right thread. I got confused and thought I had put it in the incorrect one)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But what is the consequence of the indictment?

Bannon will not go to jail.

Infuriated Democrats and Country Club Republicans (Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney, McConnell) want to shut Bannon up and end his effective broadcast. Bannon was key to getting sweeping victories in Virginia, New York and New Jersey earlier this month. He is extremely effective communicator and they are scared of his influence.


It’s a scorched-earth attempt to shut Bannon up because he’s incredibly effective in motivating voters to oppose Globalist policies.

^^^^divorced from reality

On planet earth, Bannon was an architect on behalf of the Koch brothers of an autocracy. He has long preached burning down the administrative state and letting what emerges prevail. As such, the Trump administration was about doing as much damage as possible to our institutions as well as the global alliances and institutions. I am no sure why global US companies think that is good for business in the long run, but ultimately, Bannon clearly was deeply involved in 1/6 and helped promote it.

And yes, Bannon is also partially responsible for echoing the falsehoods around CRT that riled enough red voters to support a Trump accolyte in Virginia.

Murphy won NJ, so not sure what PP is talking about re: Republican victories there or in NY.

Frankly, other than losing Virginia, which can also be blamed on McAullife being a horrible candidate who didn't run a robust campaign, the democrats did better than incumbants historically do in the year after a presidential election.

Long Island/Nassau County local elections were all won by Republicans:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/08/nyregion/nassau-county-republicans-election.html



NJ State Senate Leader (D) ousted by Republican newcomer. NJ governor race within 2 points. Republicans resurgent in local NJ elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Free speech has limits. So says SCOTUS

Inciting violence isn’t protected.

Bannon did not incite violence. You need receipts to prove your statement. Just because you write that statement does not make that true.

The video posted earlier should be pretty clear evidence

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He helped plan/instigate a violent insurrection that got people killed. None of the nonsense you are spouting about anything else makes a dang bit of difference.

PP (or PPs) who is defending Bannon, can you please respond to this?

If you are really interested in hearing what Bannon said leading up to January 6 -- go directly to his podcasts which are just audio versions of his livestreamed shows.

BANNON NEVER called for violence. He has always advocated peaceful protests/political activism through voting and getting involved in local politics.

I hate injustice and hate how the Biden Administration is weaponizing DOJ against Bannon and other political opponents. As a country, we should be afraid for the attack on our 1st Amendment and attempt to silence political opponents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He helped plan/instigate a violent insurrection that got people killed. None of the nonsense you are spouting about anything else makes a dang bit of difference.

PP (or PPs) who is defending Bannon, can you please respond to this?

If you are really interested in hearing what Bannon said leading up to January 6 -- go directly to his podcasts which are just audio versions of his livestreamed shows.

BANNON NEVER called for violence. He has always advocated peaceful protests/political activism through voting and getting involved in local politics.

I hate injustice and hate how the Biden Administration is weaponizing DOJ against Bannon and other political opponents. As a country, we should be afraid for the attack on our 1st Amendment and attempt to silence political opponents.

Bannon wanted to burn it all down figuratively, starting before Trump's presidency.

That is separate from January 6, which was a failed insurrection. The Jan 6 committee wants to ask him questions about the events leading up to and the day of. And he said No. So now they are holding him in contempt. None of this is something that our country should fear. This is not about silencing political opponents.

[Anonymous]

He needs to answer questions about his involvement.

They want him to talk, not silence him

[Anonymous]

If pro-Bannon folks think this is about shutting down free speech, then why isn't Bannon using this platform to speak? This is a perfect opportunity to go before Congress and blow everything wide open, no?

It's easy to spout nonsense and conspiracy theories on your entertainment show; not so easy to do that under oath.

And that is why none of the #stopthesteal lawsuits produced any evidence that proved the election was stolen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If pro-Bannon folks think this is about shutting down free speech, then why isn't Bannon using this platform to speak? This is a perfect opportunity to go before Congress and blow everything wide open, no?

It's easy to spout nonsense and conspiracy theories on your entertainment show; not so easy to do that under oath.

And that is why none of the #stopthesteal lawsuits produced any evidence that proved the election was stolen.

Because he doesn't have to.

[Anonymous]

Its just a political witch hunt.

J6 Committee is going nowhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If pro-Bannon folks think this is about shutting down free speech, then why isn't Bannon using this platform to speak? This is a perfect opportunity to go before Congress and blow everything wide open, no?

It's easy to spout nonsense and conspiracy theories on your entertainment show; not so easy to do that under oath.

And that is why none of the #stopthesteal lawsuits produced any evidence that proved the election was stolen.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

You think it would be fair? Let me guess, you believed the fraudulent Russian Collusion/Steele Dossier hoax? Mainstream media and Democratic leaders LIED to you. And you still trust the process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
If pro-Bannon folks think this is about shutting down free speech, then why isn't Bannon using this platform to speak? This is a perfect opportunity to go before Congress and blow everything wide open, no?

It's easy to spout nonsense and conspiracy theories on your entertainment show; not so easy to do that under oath.

And that is why none of the #stopthesteal lawsuits produced any evidence that proved the election was stolen.



LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

You think it would be fair? Let me guess, you believed the fraudulent Russian Collusion/Steele Dossier hoax? Mainstream media and Democratic leaders LIED to you. And you still trust the process.

And the virus was a hoax. And hydroxychloroquine is a cure. And I can draw a line with a sharpie pen where I want to and etc. etc. etc. etc. Yeah, someone lied to us and tried to dupe us . . . a LOT.