Bannon indicted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But what is the consequence of the indictment?

Bannon will not go to jail.

Infuriated Democrats and Country Club Republicans (Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney, McConnell) want to shut Bannon up and end his effective broadcast. Bannon was key to getting sweeping victories in Virginia, New York and New Jersey earlier this month. He is extremely effective communicator and they are scared of his influence.


It’s a scorched-earth attempt to shut Bannon up because he’s incredibly effective in motivating voters to oppose Globalist policies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But what is the consequence of the indictment?

Bannon will not go to jail.

Infuriated Democrats and Country Club Republicans (Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney, McConnell) want to shut Bannon up and end his effective broadcast. Bannon was key to getting sweeping victories in Virginia, New York and New Jersey earlier this month. He is extremely effective communicator and they are scared of his influence.


It’s a scorched-earth attempt to shut Bannon up because he’s incredibly effective in motivating voters to oppose Globalist policies.

Lol ok. We’ll see - wouldn’t be too optimistic Stevie boy!

[Anonymous]

Wow there are some hard core Bannon apologists in here.

So many people living in a alternate reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow there are some hard core Bannon apologists in here.

So many people living in a alternate reality.

Or just one who keeps posting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow there are some hard core Bannon apologists in here.

So many people living in a alternate reality.

Or just one who keeps posting.

I wonder if any of you have ever actually listened to Bannon unfiltered? Serious question. Outside of the MSNBC Rachel Maddow/Mornings with Joe/Joy Reid/Jake Tapper bubble.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have no problem with this indictment, and by way of background - I thought Trump was the worst President we've ever had with no redeeming qualities. So, that said, I never quite got the intensity of the Bannon-hate from my leftie type friends. I find him disagreeable and he was clearly working for political goals I disagree with. But I've never been able to work up too much emotion about him one way or the other.

Am I missing something? Is he a uniquely bad person? Like head and shoulders above the other miscreants in the Trump administration? For example, my friends dislike Michael Flynn, but they never seemed as worked up about him as Bannon.

He’s being indicted because he’s a huge danger to the left. He is not a bad person at all. He’s brilliant, retired Navy, and knows a hell of a lot about investments/money. Good luck to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no problem with this indictment, and by way of background - I thought Trump was the worst President we've ever had with no redeeming qualities. So, that said, I never quite got the intensity of the Bannon-hate from my leftie type friends. I find him disagreeable and he was clearly working for political goals I disagree with. But I've never been able to work up too much emotion about him one way or the other.

Am I missing something? Is he a uniquely bad person? Like head and shoulders above the other miscreants in the Trump administration? For example, my friends dislike Michael Flynn, but they never seemed as worked up about him as Bannon.

Yes. He was abusive to his wife and daughter. He's a highly intelligent and resourceful character but his hate for certain groups is very real, and he tried to leverage his thorough understanding of politics and international economic forces to make his vision of a White, non-Jewish-dominated world come true. Not that he's Christian or particularly religious. But the nationalist Old Order suits him, and plenty of others in Europe are of like mind. It's dangerous. The attempts to make money are secondary for him.

Micheal Flynn is only in it for the money, and he has no international world order aspirations. He's a nonentity in the long run. Just another grifter.

Maureen? She works with him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no problem with this indictment, and by way of background - I thought Trump was the worst President we've ever had with no redeeming qualities. So, that said, I never quite got the intensity of the Bannon-hate from my leftie type friends. I find him disagreeable and he was clearly working for political goals I disagree with. But I've never been able to work up too much emotion about him one way or the other.

Am I missing something? Is he a uniquely bad person? Like head and shoulders above the other miscreants in the Trump administration? For example, my friends dislike Michael Flynn, but they never seemed as worked up about him as Bannon.

Steve Bannon’s role was to stir up as much awful racist, anti-immigrant, etc. sentiment as possible so Trump could win on a campaign of addressing all of the fury Bannon stoked. Michael Flynn broke the law, but his conduct did not attack the fabric of our society the way Bannon’s did.

Have you actually ever listened to Bannon’s War Room broadcast or his re-played podcast? He is nothing like you describe.

So much hatred from the Left for a man (Bannon) who is America-First Populist and Anti-Globalist/Anti-Party of Davos.

Bannon talks nearly EVERY episode of how working class AA, Hispanic and White laborers will be economically crushed by this flood of illegal immigrants driving down wages. He talks of how the CCP is hurting the Chinese people. Bannon is a Populist who is being targeted by the Left to silence him in a Stasi-like takedown. The Left fear him because he is making huge inroads in the Hispanic and AA voting base with his message.

Are there no honest Democrats who will stand up for the rights of their political opponents? Are there any of you here on DCUM who can see that the Left is targeting political opponents unlawfully?

All 100% true. He’s as far from racist as you can get. And Posobiec, who works with him, knows the CCP backwards, forwards and sideways. Fluent Mandarin, having spent years there. And Raheem Kassam, who has worked closely with Bannon for over a decade, is of Muslim background. They are very close.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no problem with this indictment, and by way of background - I thought Trump was the worst President we've ever had with no redeeming qualities. So, that said, I never quite got the intensity of the Bannon-hate from my leftie type friends. I find him disagreeable and he was clearly working for political goals I disagree with. But I've never been able to work up too much emotion about him one way or the other.

Am I missing something? Is he a uniquely bad person? Like head and shoulders above the other miscreants in the Trump administration? For example, my friends dislike Michael Flynn, but they never seemed as worked up about him as Bannon.

Steve Bannon’s role was to stir up as much awful racist, anti-immigrant, etc. sentiment as possible so Trump could win on a campaign of addressing all of the fury Bannon stoked. Michael Flynn broke the law, but his conduct did not attack the fabric of our society the way Bannon’s did.

Have you actually ever listened to Bannon’s War Room broadcast or his re-played podcast? He is nothing like you describe.

So much hatred from the Left for a man (Bannon) who is America-First Populist and Anti-Globalist/Anti-Party of Davos.

Bannon talks nearly EVERY episode of how working class AA, Hispanic and White laborers will be economically crushed by this flood of illegal immigrants driving down wages. He talks of how the CCP is hurting the Chinese people. Bannon is a Populist who is being targeted by the Left to silence him in a Stasi-like takedown. The Left fear him because he is making huge inroads in the Hispanic and AA voting base with his message.

Are there no honest Democrats who will stand up for the rights of their political opponents? Are there any of you here on DCUM who can see that the Left is targeting political opponents unlawfully?

I was going to answer the earlier poster's probably not legitimate question about why people hate Bannon, but I will answer this instead -

Leave everything else about Steve Bannon aside - whether he's racist, or a terrible person, etc. and what you have is a person that favors an authoritarian state. The above post is of course not sincere in any way. Maybe it's someone who legitimately reads this forum, but it's also equally as likely that an automated process searched the web for Bannon's name and now you get the talking points.

Bannon doesn't care about working class people, no matter what their race. The goal is to have a unitary executive that will operate at the boundary of the law or right outside it. Do you remember when Trump deployed federal law enforcement (or something) to guard the monuments and their faces were covered and they had no identification/badges? This is the goal. Total non/un accountability for all government actions until so much is eroded that you don't even challenge it. You don't even really need to be overtly racist and can pay lip service to equality. It's really this and nothing more.

I wrote the previous post and listen to Bannon’s War Room podcasts daily — for the past year. I am an educated person (have Master’s Degree) who has lived in DC area for past 30 years. You are the propagandist who has obviously never listened to Bannon’s show. The current Biden regime is the one locking-down and crushing political opponents and free speech. Weaponizing the DOJ against reporters, parents and political opponents. Do you even recognize America anymore? Where is liberty?

And Bannon most certainly DOES cares for the working poor of America — Bannon talks daily about how the lowest skilled AA, Hispanic and Whites will be crushed by soaring inflation, high gas and home heating bills, and flood of illegals driving down wages. He regularly has reporters at the Southern border (reporters who are Hispanic)talking about the crush of unmitigated illegal immigration and how the cartels abuse/rape the women and traffic minors.

For any of you who care about free speech and want to really hear what Steve Bannon talks about on his show, not what someone else tells you to think about Bannon, here is link to one segment of his show from this morning:

https://americasvoice.news/video/6Gj8mewzKw7eWIR

You are talking to a bunch of mindless drones; good luck with this but I admire you for trying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow there are some hard core Bannon apologists in here.

So many people living in a alternate reality.

Or just one who keeps posting.

Two. So far.

[Anonymous]

He helped plan/instigate a violent insurrection that got people killed. None of the nonsense you are spouting about anything else makes a dang bit of difference.

[Anonymous]

I don't know about Congressional contempt, but in judicial contempt, many times the penalty is incarceration until the person complies with an order of the court.

So, wouldn't this potentially involve incarceration until he complies with the Congressional order to testify?

[Anonymous]

Here's a list of previous political office holders held in contempt of Congress:

Henry Kissinger
Janet Reno
Harriet Miers
Joshua Bolton
Eric Holder
Lois Lerner
Bryan Pagliano
Bill Barr
Chad Wolf

Yet politicized Biden Regime DOJ arresting Bannon, trashing 1st Amendment.

[Anonymous]

Is this a talking point from his podcast yesterday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But what is the consequence of the indictment?

Bannon will not go to jail.

Infuriated Democrats and Country Club Republicans (Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney, McConnell) want to shut Bannon up and end his effective broadcast. Bannon was key to getting sweeping victories in Virginia, New York and New Jersey earlier this month. He is extremely effective communicator and they are scared of his influence.


It’s a scorched-earth attempt to shut Bannon up because he’s incredibly effective in motivating voters to oppose Globalist policies.

^^^^divorced from reality

On planet earth, Bannon was an architect on behalf of the Koch brothers of an autocracy. He has long preached burning down the administrative state and letting what emerges prevail. As such, the Trump administration was about doing as much damage as possible to our institutions as well as the global alliances and institutions. I am no sure why global US companies think that is good for business in the long run, but ultimately, Bannon clearly was deeply involved in 1/6 and helped promote it.

And yes, Bannon is also partially responsible for echoing the falsehoods around CRT that riled enough red voters to support a Trump accolyte in Virginia.

Murphy won NJ, so not sure what PP is talking about re: Republican victories there or in NY.

Frankly, other than losing Virginia, which can also be blamed on McAullife being a horrible candidate who didn't run a robust campaign, the democrats did better than incumbants historically do in the year after a presidential election.